u/akamikasa

Why the hosts talk to each other like there aint no GUEST😭? Inframe: shutupwearetalkingpod

In the latest episode of SUWT, we had Kusha and her warm and enigmatic presence. The episode was overall nice and after a while I felt some organic air in the setup.

However, I have noticed a consistent issue, especially with Soumya is that she majorly focuses and talks to Vagmita in guests episode and to balance that Vagmita does the same, eventually a good segment of the episode becomes both acting like there is no guest present.

I dunno, it kinda gets awkward 🥲😅.

It also happened when Pulkit came in and both got busy in their banter and he had to but in to ensure that he is also there 😅😭.

u/akamikasa — 7 hours ago

Watching another creator slowly lean into tradwife-adjacent messaging. Inframe:darkswan.official

I kinda like her presentation but simultaneously repelled by her delivery. It feels like a ‘Content’ content. Ykwik?

Like school students speaking in declamation?! Also, her putting the soft trad wife type of content on ‘how to manipulate a man’ or ‘love is real’ seems like she is the only one driving her relationship.

A few of her videos where she talks about her marriage struggles, it has an unsaid notion that there is visible asymmetry, that she has to put more to fix a relationship, you see stepping into her nurturer role.

u/akamikasa — 7 hours ago

Why female friendships are hard? (Demystifying the misogynistic stereotypes)

Friendships are an essential aspect of every person’s life, though up-keeping them is where expectations often shatter and one gets to face reality.

Myth 1: Women disapprove of other women

Actual Reason: Women haven’t been allowed to be themselves till last decade (even today), they are made to confide and comply a ridiculous standards with which they may or may not resonate. The parameter of approval and validation has been so narrow that a minute slip up can seem drastic.

Also, a woman is hardly allowed to redeem herself (her dignity and self respect)in such systems hence they can either tripple down (eventually becoming a bad woman) or stay stagnant. In such cases, where you are not meant to win, relationships like friendships cannot thrive.

Friendships like any other relationship require some breathing space and appropriate opportunities for each individual to thrive on their own terms.

Myth 2. Female friendships don’t last long

Actual reason: longevity of a relationship ≠ quality of a relationship. People change as they grow, they move cities, change opinions, change tastes and what not. In case of women, quite a lot of us had to discard our friendship (the ones in closer vicinity) in order to settle down somewhere else post marriage.
Friendships that were 10-20+ fall apart once one moves cities. Geographical vicinity does matter!

Also when you club this with reason number 1, the long term friend, with time, seems to feel unfamiliar. Hence, the bond is lost.

Also, speaking of vicinity, a lot of women still live under harsh curfews, they aren’t allowed to go anywhere else apart from schools/colleges/near by stores. How you are supposed to maintain a friendship when you hardly get to be together?

Another thing, a lot of families frown upon their daughters being on phones unless there is a ‘reason’ how are you supposed to maintain a friendship if you don’t get to talk to them.

Confinement is one of the leading factors why friendships die out early.

Myth 3. Women never patch up with their friends if things go downhill

Actual reason: Well this isn’t a ‘myth’ myth 😅, I have observed this happen quite a lot. But what I can tell from my experience is, women/girls hold onto instances a bit too dearly. (Not saying this is wrong)

The reason behind this could be that we project the same ‘perfection’ of morals and duties on our friends as us, which kind of creates a dichotomy and asymmetry in expectations and standards, we subconsciously become less forgiving towards other women/girls who are still figuring things out, because that’s what society has asked us to be, be perfect or be nothing. There is no space to make mistakes and learn from them.

(Not excusing someone else’s bad behaviour here btw, such cases aren’t accounted here)

That’s all I could think of, have I missed something?

P.S. Sorry it got quite long, basically the gist is that there are limited opportunities for self exploration hence, sustaining friendships as a woman becomes challenging.

reddit.com
u/akamikasa — 1 day ago

Why female friendships are hard? (Demystifying the misogynistic stereotypes)

Friendships are an essential aspect of every person’s life, though up-keeping them is where expectations often shatter and one gets to face reality.

Myth 1: Women disapprove of other women

Actual Reason: Women haven’t been allowed to be themselves till last decade (even today), they are made to confide and comply a ridiculous standards with which they may or may not resonate. The parameter of approval and validation has been so narrow that a minute slip up can seem drastic.

Also, a woman is hardly allowed to redeem herself (her dignity and self respect)in such systems hence they can either tripple down (eventually becoming a bad woman) or stay stagnant. In such cases, where you are not meant to win, relationships like friendships cannot thrive.

Friendships like any other relationship require some breathing space and appropriate opportunities for each individual to thrive on their own terms.

Myth 2. Female friendships don’t last long

Actual reason: longevity of a relationship ≠ quality of a relationship. People change as they grow, they move cities, change opinions, change tastes and what not. In case of women, quite a lot of us had to discard our friendship (the ones in closer vicinity) in order to settle down somewhere else post marriage.
Friendships that were 10-20+ fall apart once one moves cities. Geographical vicinity does matter!

Also when you club this with reason number 1, the long term friend, with time, seems to feel unfamiliar. Hence, the bond is lost.

Also, speaking of vicinity, a lot of women still live under harsh curfews, they aren’t allowed to go anywhere else apart from schools/colleges/near by stores. How you are supposed to maintain a friendship when you hardly get to be together?

Another thing, a lot of families frown upon their daughters being on phones unless there is a ‘reason’ how are you supposed to maintain a friendship if you don’t get to talk to them.

Confinement is one of the leading factors why friendships die out early.

Myth 3. Women never patch up with their friends if things go downhill

Actual reason: Well this isn’t a ‘myth’ myth 😅, I have observed this happen quite a lot. But what I can tell from my experience is, women/girls hold onto instances a bit too dearly. (Not saying this is wrong)

The reason behind this could be that we project the same ‘perfection’ of morals and duties on our friends as us, which kind of creates a dichotomy and asymmetry in expectations and standards, we subconsciously become less forgiving towards other women/girls who are still figuring things out, because that’s what society has asked us to be, be perfect or be nothing. There is no space to make mistakes and learn from them.

(Not excusing someone else’s bad behaviour here btw, such cases aren’t accounted here)

That’s all I could think of, have I missed something?

P.S. Sorry it got quite long, basically the gist is that there are limited opportunities for self exploration hence, sustaining friendships as a woman becomes challenging.

reddit.com
u/akamikasa — 1 day ago

IMdb has a page for G@ys of Bollywood?!

Well the list is mostly derived from mass rumours, but I am surprised that such a page is still up?

u/akamikasa — 1 day ago

I have never seen enough explicitly dressed women as much as explicitly naked men

“Women roam around naked”, “girl nowadays don’t want to wear clothes”, “every other girl wants to show her cleavage”….

SHUT UP!!!!

I have never seen enough of women wearing bold dresses outside social media than I have seen naked uncles roaming freely here and there!

I didn’t even sign up for such views yet be it any place, especially a remotely available water body, men literally get into their short undies and start making every women around them uncomfortable.

Be it balcony, roof, nearby grocery store, you would atleast find a uncle who is either in his abruptly fitted vest or bare chested with a towel beneath. The vest isn’t covering their nipps enough….

ALSO SOME LITERALLY PULL UP THEIR VESTS TO SCRATCH THEIR BIG POT BELLY AND NAVEL.

Massive uprise of boldly dress women only seems to be limited to social media perhaps, because wherever I go I literally see women putting a dupatta on their loose t shirt with a loose lower pant, while their partners are literally ROAMING IN SHORTS WHILE EXPOSING THEIR BUSHY LEGS.

Only a fraction of women in tier-1 cities are getting to dress like that, but men literally dress like that all over our country.

THINK!

u/akamikasa — 4 days ago

Some Men’s logic: If a woman stay in a tier-1 city she definitely sleeps around

I am tired about this whole discourse and more and so insecurity projected by some men who come from tier-2 cities or below that any woman who has lived and done her education from tier-1 city has slept around.

Especially when it comes to women who pursue their higher education from cities like Delhi, Pune, Mumbai or Bangalore. They kind of tell their own fantasy of what they would be doing when they reach bigger cities.

Not just men, but a lot of women from tier-2 cities or below (and especially their mothers) consider career oriented and outspoken women from tier-1 city a literal vamp (prostitute).

It is a hell hole for women living in this country!

u/akamikasa — 6 days ago

My two cents on “who should pay on a date” arguement

There is this classic discourse on the internet that whether a man should take care of the bill or should do 50:50.

Honestly, I am pro-splitting and going dutch, but the entire conversation and expected outcome seems pretty reductive and the real issue is swept under the rug.

U see there is an uprise among men who want to test independence of women by only gauging their capability to split a bill, it kind of rubs the reciever in a wrong way (and rightfully so) that feminism and independence is only concerned when it comes to splitting the bill.

But not when they expect you to perform feminity, when they want you to be intelligent but not more than them, when they want you to be confident but only as per their liking, you need to be everything exceptional under the sun but not enough than the person sitting infront you, if a woman is expected to participate in performative feminity only to recieve a drop of affection from the man, then men shouldn’t be allowed to cry either way when perforomative masculinity is expected out of them in return.

Right from the burden of beauty standards and this constant mental gymnastics of being docile and confident, managing the risk to reach the place of date to managing the risk of not being harrassed by the guy, who’s gonna talk about it? The risk pool is way asymmetrical, especially in the case of women even before the date starts.

A-lot can go wrong than it going right.

Also, there are this kind of people who would pay on the date and refuse to split there and then but send you the bill once you reach home, WHY YOU FELT THE NEED TO PULL OUT THE PERFORMANCE THEN SIR?

Further, I genuinely don’t understand that if men wish to be on a date with someone who splits, it seems reasonable to voice it out before planning the date, why you have to stay mum till the last moment? I mean the women who don’t wish to split would eventually make your search easier and then you can go on a date with someone who actually supports splitting up the bill.

Lastly, this whole intent to test someone’s independence by their ability to split kind of feels odd, especially when a guy explicitly says - ‘oh you are a feminist, you should take care of the bill’. Like yeah I do, and I would genuinely pay my part but why felt the need to voice it out like that, it feels like a mockery cum surprise test was thrown in my way to test whether I could pass it or not.

If the intent is to test independence, can I make you clean the table or mop the floor to check whether you aren’t a dependent entity or not? Nobody seems interested in questioning a MAN’s independence on date, let alone test it.

My whole point is, alot goes behind and before a bill is brought up, and to be noted, if you wish to have someone who culminated traditional values of femininity, you lose your right to nag about you being a traditional man (who is supposed to protect AND PROVIDE). IT IS A MULTI-PLAYER GAME, why women are supposed to play it single-handedly????

If you want someone modern and independent then also make exceptions for looks, build and confidence. Then we would talk about equality.

If I am missing anything, do mention below, I am open to a healthy conversation 😃

reddit.com
u/akamikasa — 6 days ago

I have noticed that whenever Vicky is running low on buzz, all of a sudden quite a lot posts about Katrina starts surfacing

I initially thought that it could be a coincidence, but nowadays I see a pattern.

Like other A listers have buzz around themselves, be it male or female stars. But hardly anyone talks about Vicky naturally.

I also think that Katrina’s stardom is kinda used to keep Vicky (Kat ofc) mainstream. I understand that they recently had a baby, but this phenomenon had been running before that.

Like there was this instance where in an event Vicky made a stupid wife joke, and after that alot of Katrina’s posts and edits started influxing on Instagram and reddit, especially on how Vicky was THE GUY for Kat who had been a damsel in distress otherwise. (This had been the tonality)

u/akamikasa — 6 days ago

I really miss Kahin to Hoga 😭 the show was so fresh and characters had a brain of their own + the romance 💕

The only streaming platform that has this show hasn’t uploaded all the episodes 😭. I feel so nostalgic about this show which I can’t put it in words, I loved the ambiance and energy among the leads.

Sujal and Kashish were great but I also like Piyush and Kashish, Piyush was such an unproblematic and chill guy, he stood with Kashish through thick and thin.

Are there any watchers of this show here? I remember how big Rajiv was back then, Amna in an interview mentioned that fans used to write love letters to him by their blood 🫥.

I really like Amna’s styling in the show too, the only person I disliked were siblings of both the leads, especially the one played by Shabir (he played the bad guy so well).

u/akamikasa — 7 days ago

Finally finished the sketch ✍️

Medium: Retractable pen and markers

u/akamikasa — 12 days ago

The content of SUWT is slightly shifting to noticeable benevolent patriarchy inframe: shutupwearetalkingpod

With their new set of episodes around marriage, dating expectations and romance I have a feeling that the two leads are kinda pivoting from the main track.

Initially, the pod started with a good thought to bring light to necessary subjects, however lately it feels like the subject material is subtly shifting in some other directions.

Both Vagmita and Soumya might be great individuals, and honestly I am no one to judge you for having certain expectations in YOUR DATING LIFE, but the moment you use your own podcast to validate your ideology of benevolence in patriarchy that too in dating, I catch a problem.

“We both kinda like red flag guys”, “we want a man to dominate but not show it”… I know you might be good at heart while voicing out your opinions but I cannot deny that it subtly comes of as something problematic.

Also this patriarchal expectation of being A LADY/ A WOMAN in a relationship while being independent and stuff actually really doesn’t go that much hand in hand. It feels like you want to upkeep the traditional image while being modern, which is not wrong at personal level but in a country like ours, opting out of Traditional expectations isn’t a choice for many women.

It is either they be traditional patriarchal DIL/ partner or live a seperate life. So your choice actually does some degree of damage here.

After watching all of their episodes it is kind of clear that both are leaning CHOICE FEMINISTS. Again nothing wrong at an individual level, but using your platform to preach it while ignoring your privileges to make that CHOICE at first place and live in a city where you can exercise your individuality, is a little concerning.

A lot of young girls consume this content who are heavily under the influence of their community and severely dependent.

I am not saying that the podcast does any disservice to the essential topics like woman safety, dowry challenge, etc. but there are softer and broader areas of life too where they need to revise their verbose before voicing it out on a public platform.

u/akamikasa — 14 days ago

I am tired of quite a lot female creators who drop soft misogynistic remarks along the lines of why am I supposed to work? (Like Apoorva, cribbing about working as if it isn’t the only thing which has gained her popularity)

But like they themselves aren’t putting their money where the mouth is! If you strongly believe that marrying and having a partner would fix things THAN DO IT PLEASE.

Don’t use your platform to push this soft misogyny when you urself are upkeeping your lifestyle THROUGH THAT WORK.

I can excuse whining about working, or work life balance taking a toll on your mental health but marriage isn’t a band aid solution you want others to believe.

u/akamikasa — 16 days ago

With such an enigmatic presence of Guru Dutt ji, Kagaz ke phool marked as his last directorial work.

The movie touches a very sensitive topic of how fame is just for namesake. Nothing is forever, even the relationships, friendships you had.

Ironically, Suresh Sinha shares the same fate as Guru Dutt ji. Both had an unfortunate turn of events because of which both had left working as a director.

If you know Guru Dutt ji’s story, you would be able to draw several parallels from this movie.

One of the note worthy scene from this movie is its ending, where Suresh in the final moments, after wandering and running for years, for the last time apparently, assimilates into is identity as director-Suresh Sinha, before the curtains are closed.

Just like a paper flower never dies, but rather catches dirt and is lost in relevance (leading to a metaphorical collapse), same is the fate of our protagonist. Hence the title, ‘Kagaz ke phool’.

u/akamikasa — 17 days ago

Awards have always been rigged, which had also been confirmed by several people working in the field.

A lot had been said in this article by Shekhar Gupta, where he had revealed some sizzling tea about the popular stars back then.

One like such was around Katrina not getting an award and having a major meltdown which led to the production introducing a new category- People’s Choice awards - Shekhar Gupta

u/akamikasa — 19 days ago

Not only the spiteful MIL killed an innocent soul out of mania, her son didn’t report the case until his mother flew to Venezuela and kept the body as it is TO BREASTFEED HIS DAUGHTER.

u/akamikasa — 19 days ago