
What's one of your favorite parts in a comedy movie?
Name a movie scene that will always be funny to you no matter how much time has passed.

Name a movie scene that will always be funny to you no matter how much time has passed.
As a ankle biting rug rat, back to the beach was a movie my brother and I loved to make fun of in the 1980s. Bobby is actually funnier to me as an adult than when I was a kid. Here is a scene that's classic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN6sxpIGeGI
An absolute CHEESE FEST. Lol. What else do you remember? Any other weird movies you watched as a kid and how do you feel watching them as an adult? Are there any films you loved as a kid but you saw as an adult and CRINGED at? There are a few I can't watch anymore. Also what movie scared you as a kid despite it not really being a horror film.
My mom died when I was a young teenager and I've been blessed with a photographic memory and I can remember every time she laughed at a movie scene or a tv show episode like Tales from the crypt. Her laugh was so wholesome and contagious. She'd sometimes laugh so hard her eyes would tear up and I must have inherited that as it happens to me too, lol.
Description Summary for the video: Dear Zachary is about the life and death of Andrew Bagby told by the filmmaker and close friend Kurt Kuenne who made this to memorialize him. A deeply personal documentary made with genuine love and pain that you will never forget. It is a film like no other.
My Review:
This review contains spoilers.
I had heard about this for years and mainly heard that there was a twist. I figured the twist would be Shirley wasn't the killer and that the killer was one of the friends being interviewed during production. Course once I heard even the beginning of Shirley's answers, behavior, and the evidence against her I knew she committed the crime.
So I watched it and as I was watching it I suddenly thought to myself "Is Zachary dead" and I said it can't be because how and why would they finish this documentary as that would be very sad. I at first thought maybe he had an unknown disease that cut his life short or died in some tragic accident. Then another thought came to me. Where is Shirley? I got a bad feeling. Then when she was allowed out, I remember saying "Wait, what if she kills him?"
I study Criminology and I've had a long standing beef with Canadian investigations and their justice system. So the fact it's Canada didn't surprise me. Who are these judges anyway? So Shirley had every red flag behavior known to man. The most dangerous type of offender has a history of stalking. Andrew was overkilled. She was obsessive. I even remember saying early on, when she first left the I LOVE YOU message to Zachary is sounded phony, creepy, and with no warmth of any kind or sincerity.
Her psychiatrist posting her bail. I'm just going to point out the obvious. They were sleeping together. Very unprofessional behavior and I've never heard of a shrink bailing out a patient being accused of murder. Appalling.
It was a little hard to follow at the beginning, but it got better as it progressed. Zachary's blood is on that judge's hands and anyone involved with her release. Here in America, she'd have never been released.
What are your thoughts on this documentary?
I randomly found this track and I've listened to this like 20 times in a row speeding around on my bike like a speed demon. This band apparently switched vocalists from this young woman to a male. I do not know her name. I'd like to find if she ever did any other music besides this. I love her scream vocals. There isn't even lyrics for it. I think she says "She fights for the FIGHT" it's a banger for sure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf44EGv1dRA&list=RDtf44EGv1dRA&start_radio=1
All opinions are welcome. Just wondering what you think of a situation where a woman meets a guy friend at a motel but not for sex, and gets drugged by him, is she at fault?
I just remember a victim, and other victims or Harvey Weinstein met with him, not for sex, but for business at a hotel. And people supported her due to audio of him being a creep. And the actor who accused Asia Argento met her at a hotel after exchanging graphic images and texts he sent to her, then he claimed rape. He got endless support because he was 17. She said she didn't know how old he was and thought he was around 20. I'm not defending anyone just laying out the facts. These are examples.
So just asking, not everyone meets for intercourse at a motel. Back in the day I had friends that would rent a room and invite multiple people over and listen to music, smoke pot, and watch movies. The law and conservatives though think that a woman gets exactly what she deserved if she is attacked. Even if it's a long time trusted friend or boyfriend or family member. And cuz you were alone with him. In most people's minds, motels are for intercourse only aka booty calls. Do you agree?
Carl Douglas was not on my bad side until episode 3 when he stated nobody would kill two people in such a brutal way and be able to get onto an airplane. Um... what? There was a man who literally brought his CHILDREN to commit a crime where he brutalized a woman, Sexually assaulting her while bound, then killing her. The victim had grand kids or something so toys were out and they had been played with. They fingerprinted the toy, and it matched the killer's child's prints. Douglas then goes on to say "you'd have to be a sociopath" Yes, sir. Has he ever seen the unaired interview called IF I DID IT where O.J. admits to it in a hypothetical way. The laughing, the knowledge only the killer would know, the look in his eye. Watch the behavior panel that analyzed that interview. It was unbelievably creepy. If he can watch that and think that's not a sociopath, then I really don't buy anything he says anymore. The interviewer went on to say, after the segment was done filming, O.J came up to her and said "You started out not liking me didn't you. I bet you like me now right" Her mind was blown. Reminds me of the scene in Tootsie when that misogynistic arrogant director says hey how come you don't like me? I can make any woman like me. This is a classic sociopath.
https://media.tenor.com/fBw2v4ciQ3UAAAAM/are-you-serious.gif
I'm not really stating whether or not M,J was guilty or innocent here but I'd like to point out when the prosecution asked the ones on the stand who said nothing happened if it happened in their sleep is actually based on reality. Alot of pedophiles do it that way. Watch ABDUCTED IN PLAIN SIGHT on netflix. Robert Berchtold convinced the parents to let him sleep with their daughter, who was a child, and he was repeatedly drugging her. Whether it's booze or pills or both. This is common. Look up Westley Allan Dodd, who became a child killer. He babysat for free at age 13, and molested kids that were 3 in their sleep and documented it in his disgusting journal. This is a very strong possibility and didn't that one kid state on the stand, the brother, he saw his brother Gavin look "unconscious" interesting word there actually. Just sayin'
Debbie Rowe was never going to testify against MJ... I can't believe the DA fell for this. Wow they played dirty in this one. This was all planned to help out MJ. She had too much to lose for one thing. Surprised they didn't see this coming.
This is my personal opinion. What is yours?
I really loved the action film UPGRADE. It's unusual, very dark, and very deep sci fi action thriller. Contrary to popular belief, the ending is actually perfect.
If you've seen the movie, check out this awesome tribute I saw for fans of this film. Obviously it contains spoilers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymlLqQWrlHE
My main question for you is: did you hate the ending? Did you find it heartbreaking? I've since changed my opinion on the ending. It reminds me of the ending to Shutter Island when Andrew says "tell me...Which would be worse: to live as a monster, or to die as a good man?" He was a completely broken man, and knowing the truth was the last straw. His wife was gone, and the revenge satisfied until he learned of Stem's true motive. So by taking his will away completely in a way he is dead...so whatever is left of him is stuck in a delusional fake world where he is happy and free of the truth and the loss and the betrayal. I feel that this was actually a happy ending. He isn't there forever, only until Stem manages to get himself killed and the body dies too. That's just my take. The only fact which will always be the tragic part is that Stem was both the perpetrator and the savior. So his wife's killer (the one who orchestrated her death) fully gained control of his mind and body, while setting him free in the end. I took it as, he couldn't just pick a victim who wasn't married to do this to. They needed do create fresh trauma and that way he was emotionally vulnerable and the more times he let Stem have control the weaker he got in regards to fighting for control. Almost like a demon possession. Like the movie NEFARIOUS, which is a very engaging film and Sean Patrick Flannery is oscar worthy in it.. he explains the 5 stages as Extreme Temptation, obsession, infestation, possession, and Full Subjugation. And this is achieved after a series of "yeses" that grant the demon increasing rights to the victim, ultimately stripping away their free will. Anyway, fantastic unforgettable movie.
When BANSHEE aired, many did not have that channel called Cinemax. And the show was not promoted well. It's very underrated. I honestly enjoyed it more than Sons of Anarchy!
There are really only a handful of excellent true crime movies out there.
Bully 2001 by Larry Clark is one of the rawest most realistic true crime films ever made. I appreciate the extra mile Clark went to make this picture (coming from a student of Criminology)
Description Summary for the video: Narrates the 1984 McDonald's Massacre, where a man walked into a San Diego fast food restaurant and shot forty men, women, and children. It offers valuable educational content through previously unseen footage and survivor interviews that effectively document this tragedy's historical significance.
My Review:
One of the saddest documentaries I've ever seen. This documentary is only worth the watch for the survivors, who unfortunately had to suffer even further and endure deceptive and unprofessional behavior and odd questions from the director Charlie Minn who has done other shooting documentaries. He is all about drama and being a sensationalist. I was stunned by the statements he made blaming police and his questions kept getting weirder. He was very cold and this was poor filmmaking, if u can even call it that. Unprofessional camerawork, and biased self serving haphazard approach. He actually asked a survivor: "So, if your loved one was here right now, what would you say to them" Is he for real? None of your business dude. I've never heard a director of a documentary ask this before. But hey, he got his dramatic moment right by making them cry?
Minn managed to get those who appear on camera to sign waivers, which is standard practice for television but what he didn't do was act in good faith. Pretty much everyone who is still in the film tried to back out but a contract is a contract. This was raw exploitation of people involved in a tragedy. He lied to the families of survivors and the families of the deceased as well and they basically ran him out of town after one out of two days of filming poorly staged interviews and asking all the wrong questions.
If you're seen it, what are your thoughts? What's crazy is I rarely get offended by documentaries but he made my blood boil and I left a negative review. Something I didn't even do for Goodnight, sugar babe, which was also very unprofessional and amateurish and weird as hell and didn't focus very much on the victim.
I still recommend watching. These people are amazing and deserve to be heard. Both the survivors and victims will always be heroes. I was very moved by their bravery and selflessness.
I've lived a wild and weird life and for whatever reason I use to randomly bump into a celebrity. It happened to me so much I lost track. One celebrity I actually ran into TWICE in the SAME shopping center and the first time it was on Halloween and his movie he's most famous for was a halloween horror film which I saw in theaters lol If you want to know more just ask me. I have many funny stories.
However, the weirdest and most unpleasant: Ron Jeremy, the adult film star. I actually forgot how many cameo's that guy had in films alone, and then there was the song by Sublime that mentions him because they partied together. I've actually seen comments online where fans of Ron are saying his victims were all lying. No they were not. It's all true. I wish people warned me first about him. I had never seen any of his adult films. My friend's cousin knew him and they said hey do you wanna meet and hang out with Ron Jeremy, and I said sure. It was a haunting experience. I still have the pictures but I am reluctant to share them on here. He was also seen leaving Corey Feldman's house parties. He'd be in prison if his dementia hadn't gotten so bad. They couldn't convict him due to his mental decline. My experience was pretty bad and traumatizing but what his other victims went through was far worse and those ladies deserve justice.
So what's the weirdest or most unpleasant celebrity encounter you've had?
I'd like to discuss the film FUNNY GAMES from 1997. I had not seen it before but I saw the remake years ago and I despised it. I decided to watch the original but I had been afraid to since no one ever praised it and warned how it's much worse in terms of gritty, raw cinema.
I started thinking. I'm trying hard these days to not judge so rashly and with emotion. This time I began actually wondering what is the point of the film, and more importantly, why did this movie get remade by the same director? The answer changed how I felt about it.
When I first saw the remake, and I really didn't get it but I noticed the constant taunting of the viewer, me. Both directly and indirectly. So it turns out, when I searched why this was even remade, it made sense. So the director, Haneke, had intended his movie for American audiences but was constrained by budget and accessibility to European actors. The film was meant to be a critique on violence in American media designed to force American audiences to experience the film's critique of their own consumption of on screen violence. Haneke intended to force a mainstream audience to confront a truly uncomfortable, non-entertaining depiction of violence. I also watched the trailer, and people still went out and wanted to see a movie about a home invasion for entertainment, so his point was to punish us. The killer addresses the audience 3-4 times like "we must make this entertaining, no?" like is this good enough for ya, ya sick fucks..do you have your fill. That's actually kind of brilliant. Like in Monster Ed Gein season when Antony Perkins has a vision of Ed Gein at his murderous work and he says stop it, and Ed responds "You're the one who can't look away" which speaks to the true crime community's morbid curiosity. Also reminds me of the song Vicarious by Tool. The lyric "why can't we just admit it" this addiction to viewing bad stuff and tragedy on the news or in movies. Great point.
The victims aren't the fictional characters... we were the target. So I agree, in a way we deserve to be shamed for it. I also love there was no rape scene either and that was another middle finger Haneke made toward the sickos who wanted to see that. There are disturbed individuals who like those type scenes. And ironically, people get upset and write reviews calling the film depressing and are angry but what did you expect? Both trailers didn't lie. It even said EVIL, BRUTAL... now how can that have a happy ending with those terms across the screen. A lot of viewers really hated the director after watching, but if you think about it, each kill was offscreen.. you don't even see it.. The entire movie was mostly psychological and emotional violence. I'm surprised I didn't notice this the first time. Our emotions cloud critical thinking.
It's not a film I'd ever watch again but I have mad respect for this director. He actually had something real to say and he expressed it perfectly.
Summary of the video (submission statement): The discovery of the mutilated body of a mentally challenged young mother begins a journey into madness that is so unbelievable the mastermind behind the crime ultimately got away with murder. This is the case of Vera Jo Reigle.
I'd like to discuss this extremely disturbing documentary from 2020 called Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle. This documentary barely discussed Vera Jo and instead they interviewed very disturbed people who were complicit in the crime. Most of them evaded prosecution so this not only was an extremely distressing documentary but it was infuriating. Has anyone seen this and what did you think of it?
Shannon's interrogation on YT, the uncensored version, is one of the most disturbing interrogations I ever seen. How was she not in prison? She orchestrated the whole thing. This docu gave me nightmares. Very strange case and one of the most vicious crimes you can ever learn about. The documentary should have focused on the victim but it was a secondary topic. I was mortified and horrified by this documentary. I was actually reading reviews of it and this is the true crime community being traumatized. That's when you know you have one twisted film. This is the worst case of human depravity.