Lost Girls book: Does anyone know which parts in particular some victims’ loved ones object to?
Hi all! In the time I’ve followed this case, I have always had the impression that Kolker’s Lost Girls book was sort of the gold standard in both covering the background of the case, and telling a very human and sympathetic portrait of the victims. Kolker is obviously frequently cited in material about the case, and I’ve heard him interviewed a number of times. (I know that Jaclyn Gallucci is another journalist who was pivotal in drawing attention to the case and made a concerted effort to be extremely respectful to the victims as well, but my specific question is about Kolker and his book.)
I personally thought the book was fantastic, but obviously didn’t know the victims personally and have no connection to their loved ones. I always had the (apparently erroneous) impression that the victims’ loved ones liked Kolker and were happy about the book and its coverage.
But I feel like more recently, I’ve seen it mentioned by several victims’ family members and friends that they take specific umbrage with Kolker and think he misrepresented things in the book. I haven’t heard specifics, though, and am wondering if folks might know what specific aspects are in dispute or misrepresented? Not asking for any inside info or anything that families wouldn’t want shared at all, but if there are points that the families/friends feel that Kolker got wrong, I’m wondering if that would be shareable, if only so folks in this thread don’t keep repeating narratives from the book taking them as fact, if the victims’ loved ones feel they are wrong.