u/wowsuchredditXDD

Most of you might know about how most tracks in EATEOT have the same song preformed by different artists, this is done to convey a feeling of having forgotten what the original sample sounded like and coming up with new parts to complete the missing bits, while most samples are just the same song preformed slightly differently by another musician, lullaby of the leaves has a much more unique cover

Originally utilizing the George Olson cover for C2 and the L&J cover for F2, lullaby of the leaves is my favorite sample OF ALL TIME. But what I recently discovered was even more interesting.

Apparently, the ventures [the group behind wipeout and walk, don’t run] made their own cover for lullaby of the leaves, it even has its own unique lyrics!

And it sounds surreal, it is literally lullaby of the leaves as ventures-style surf music. The song and genre whiplash hit me very hard. I just imagine the pittor pickgown in khateinstersper on a surfboard with sunglasses absolutely shredding it.

Do you guys have any other absurd sample covers? Lmk in the comments :)

The first one was the one I saw in my dream, the rest was made by my lucid self

Recently, I got the EATEOT stage 4 vinyl. I looked at the spine and saw the names of the paintings written. The cover and right sleeve weren’t that abnormal but what got me was the “aetoaeted” since I knew that painting as “manimated sluj”. I checked the wiki and this confirmed my suspicions. I looked up the name on the spine and found only 3 results which linked back to the stage 4 vinyl itself. I looked up the title on the wiki and it just led back to the wiki itself.

I was confused. I decided to also take a look at the fan account who documents Ivan seal’s work to realize they also referred to it by the wiki name

I also looked up Ivan seal and the name of the gallery which lead me to some obscure Italian art gallery’s site where the painting is shown, but not named?

I’m so confused? Help? Is it manimated sluj or aetoeaeted? What is what??? ????

I know there is a lot about horror media that seems generic, copied, etc. (like just the concept of mascot horror in general) but my biggest peeve has to be what I call “brutality endings” [named after the ending of the same name from that one Roblox game “need more heat”] and its premise is simple: an ending where every introduced character dies except for the MC and the “big bad”

The first example that comes to my mind has to be Amanda the adventurer. It was a series I had been hyped about since the beta launches. By games 1 and 2 the story had really picked up to a point where even I was at the edge of my seat. I know no. 2 had a few major deaths but I understand that the purpose was to drive the story.

However, by the third game’s end. Literally everyone besides Riley (the MC) and Rebecca (technically the big bad) dies, disappears or is never mentioned again? Wooly was one of the most hyped characters in the series, Jordan’s appearance in 2 and 3 [especially 3] really made me interested in his story. And by the end LITERALLY BOTH OF THEM JUST DIE [well, technically not. Wooly just ambiguously dissapears after throwing a fit] I know games aren’t easy to make and I’m not saying I could’ve made it better, but having a game with this level of lore end with “everybody you know, love and hate dies :D” is such an underwhelming way to end things. It almost feels like mangled maw really wanted to end the series but didn’t have the budget/resources to give it a proper finale.

Another game like this is one I see passed around Roblox around. “Noted reality” as a concept seems interesting. Your only contact with the outside world is by notes passed into your cell. Maybe I shouldn’t be fussing about this one because it only had 5 characters in total [including the protagonist] and its main theme is isolation in general. But both of its endings are just everyone except Mr. Money [the big bad] dying. The difference between the two endjngs being either you die or survive. And not even the good ending feels like a good ending since in both scenarios everyone is dead and mr. Money walks away damage-free

I’m not saying that this isn’t a good plot device, because it has genuine uses. FNAF 6 is probably the best example since the climax reveals that the whole point was to trap the animatronics and afton in the pizzeria to free their souls via kamikaze arson. This does give a satisfying conclusion since:

1: the villain is actually DEFEATED [I don’t care how many times you come back. You have been dead to me since pizzeria sim]

2: the ending actually has PURPOSE. By the context of the story and how long the series had been going, it makes it look like a noble sacrifice rather than a generic casualty.

What I hate is the fact that characters are built up only to die by the end. A sad death can help drive a story forward and add emotion. But wiping out the entire cast as an ending just feels like a lazy way to conclude a series and makes it feel like everything worked up to that point was always irrelevant.

This has a LOT of personal bias though. LMK how y’all feel abt it.

Here are some additional details:

She hated static and put anything with it in D

She couldn’t stand stage 5 or 4. 6 was tolerable

I thought she would hate B3 but she put it in S tier.

Idk why she put C2 in C, the static doesn’t change the fact that it’s peak :(

She hated stage 5 so much she made me put a Z tier

No one can make fun of my stage 6 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Website is roastdit by kadoa btw

After 50$, 150$ of import fees and MONTHS, I FINALLY HAVE STAGE 4 ON VINYL :D

I know, they suck, they call out both antis and pros, but honestly I’m proud!

Honestly I don’t know what I was on when I made the last one-

I’m pretty sure witty already saw my art on r/artisforeveryone so I hope everyone here likes it ;p