r/Lumix

Image 1 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
Image 2 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
Image 3 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
Image 4 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
Image 5 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
Image 6 — A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)
▲ 17 r/Lumix

A leopard gecko (G9II & OM 90mm)

As the subject is way too big to be a macro model, I have to take photos of his seperate body parts

u/kietbulll — 4 hours ago
▲ 6 r/Lumix

Nikkei Industry Map (market share by manufacturer), Lumix seems to be doing well.

So the report in question just came out, and to my untrained eye, it looks pretty encouraging: Lumix has increased its market share by 1%, more importantly shipping 150k more cameras compared to the previous year.

Of course, that pales in comparison with Canon and Sony's utter dominance, but it doesn't seem to justify the pessimistic outlook about Lumix' future that some people have.

As an aside, Fujifilm has overtaken Nikon, and that's quite the suprise, to put it mildly.

u/Bladesleeper — 8 hours ago
▲ 145 r/Lumix+2 crossposts

4 Viltrox Air series lenses coming to L-mount (50/2, 40/2.5, 20/2.8, 14/4)

Just saw a post on Xiaohongshu about upcoming Viltrox L mount AF lenses.

  • 50mm F2.0
  • 40mm F2.5
  • 20mm F2.8
  • 14mm F4.0

Source: iphotopro

u/kelby99 — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/Lumix

Polar Pro Lens?

Just got a targeted ad for a 28mm light leak lens from Polar Pro. I didn’t realize they were making lenses now… Seems kinda gimmicky, but also a pretty decent price. Anyone have one, or have any thoughts on it?

u/RivVidProd — 1 day ago
▲ 22 r/Lumix

S5iiX anamorphic rig

My recently finished poor man’s arri, use it mostly for music videos and maybe will start some short films since university is starting.

u/aronn47 — 1 day ago
▲ 5 r/Lumix

How to proceed with S5 message: “please turn camera off and then back on again

Looking for advice for what to do. I purchased a used S5 about a week ago and absolutely loved it until today I got this message. There seems to be very little information about it and since the shutter works perfectly and has nothing visually wrong with it (I can take normal looking photos in the 2-3 seconds before the message appears) from the few other cases I’ve read it seems like this leads to an iOS issue. Is this definitely an iOS issue if not a shutter one? Are there any paths to repair other than sending it in to lumix? Thanks in advance

u/ZappedTree — 1 day ago
▲ 1 r/Lumix

2 camera wedding video setup: 2 S9s or S9 and S1ii?

Need advice: Investing in a wedding setup for video (moving from Sony mostly for IBIS) - I already have an S9 (ttartisan 40mm, 75mm and the lumix zoom 20-60mm 5.6)

For a second body, Deciding between another S9 or an S1ii.
There is an S9 + Lumix 24-70mm 2.8 Lens for $2200 or an S1ii for $3900 - what is the better play?

The s9 is amazing, but does have the 4k 50/60 crop!

Is the performance of the s1ii that much better to warrant the price?

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/ElectricalRoad1158 — 2 days ago
▲ 23 r/Lumix

Sigma 50/1.2 vs Jupiter-8 (50/2) size comparison.

I recently bought Sigma 50mm f1.2 to use with my Panasonic s9. It's not great handle wise but heck! This lens is sharper than anything I have ever had. I also had this little m39 lens that is also full frame and 50mm. Now I know I spoiled my view of image quality :(

u/Far-Resource3365 — 2 days ago
▲ 3 r/Lumix

Looking for small 135 mm lenses for S9. Anybody has experience on 7artisans 135 1.8 L mount and/or canon EF 135/2 L via adapter?

I am new to full frame and 135 mm (equivalent) is my favorite focal-length. I love using them for portraits and butterfly hunting. I am looking for options for my S9. Sigma 135 1.4 is way too big for me. So I am looking for these 2 options. (7artisans 135 1.8 L mount or canon EF 135/2 L via adapter). Anybody has any experiences they would like to share?

P.S. I have tried holding the 24-70 2.8 attached to the S9 and I think I can handle the weight. (might even get S5 III in the near future.)

I also attached photo I took years ago on Fuji-XE2 using the absolutely amazing XF 90 F2.

https://preview.redd.it/grrol4u2bckh1.png?width=1366&format=png&auto=webp&s=d5654e2acc6b0ef8a1e9001be3202e6dbcf1f16b

reddit.com
u/Poomwood — 1 day ago
▲ 22 r/Lumix

LX100m2 Review

This is my first time using a Panasonic camera. I had previously used Canon cameras, but I was drawn to the LX100 II because of its reasonable price and Leica lens, so I decided to give it a try. After actually using it, here are my thoughts.

The most distinctive characteristic is its vintage, film-like rendering. This is especially noticeable with orange and yellow tones, which look very filmic and tend to have more red than the actual colors. You can adjust this to some extent, but unlike Canon, which gives you a wide range of color information to work with, the LX100 II feels more like you are adjusting colors within Panasonic’s own film-like color range. If your main purpose is commercial work or product photography, it can be difficult to capture accurate product colors with this camera. However, it works very well for landscapes and images where you want a vintage look.

In low-light conditions, a lot of color information is lost. This is partly a limitation of the smaller sensor, but the LX100 II seems particularly weak in low light. On the other hand, the natural-looking noise is quite beautiful and actually works well for a vintage aesthetic. However, when shooting portraits or products, colors become even more film-like when there isn’t enough light. If you want clean, bright, and vibrant colors, I think Canon or Sony would be a better choice. In terms of color rendering, the LX100 II feels somewhat like a middle ground between Canon and Fujifilm.

It is also very portable and beautifully designed. In terms of convenience and portability, I really like it.

The battery drains faster than I expected.

When shooting portraits, the camera detects a face and automatically increases the brightness. I actually find this feature quite useful, and the results are generally good.

After using the LX100 II in real-world situations, I found that the images can sometimes look more muted, dull, or muddy than expected. If you want to minimize this, I recommend leaving the exposure and aperture on Auto as much as possible. This seems to produce better results.

I used this camera for a commercial shoot, and when there wasn’t enough natural light or the shooting conditions weren’t ideal, the colors often came out looking dull and muddy. Because of the camera’s limitations, it was difficult to accurately predict how the final images would turn out, which made me feel somewhat uneasy and uncertain throughout the shoot.

Overall, I think it is a good camera for the price. However, I would say it is best suited to people who have a specific purpose or aesthetic in mind. If your primary goal is commercial photography or accurate product photography, I would not recommend it. personally, Personally, I’m quite satisfied with it as a secondary camera for casual everyday snapshots, rather than as my main camera.

u/SnooCauliflowers8417 — 2 days ago
▲ 114 r/Lumix+1 crossposts

Old Florida (LUMIX S9 + 20-60mm & 40mm)

Spent the weekend at the river in the Panhandle. These were shot on my S9 with the 20-60mm and 40mm.

u/Lilesman — 3 days ago
▲ 48 r/Lumix

If your in need of storage don't sleep on these Apache Cases from Harbor Freight.

This one in particular is the Apache 4800

u/kasirkin29 — 3 days ago
▲ 4 r/Lumix

Lumix S 16-35mm F4 vs 24-60 F2.8 for travel

So, I use a Lumix S5II, I started first with a 20-60mm which was then replaced by a Sigma 45mm F2.8 because most of my shots were around that focal range, which I love.

Eventually I added a Sigma 20mm F2 to my kit, but soon realized that lens swapping during trips ends up getting quite inconvenient, especially when I'm travelling with other people.

Because of this I'm hoping to sell the Sigma 20mm F2 (which I normally use in interiors) and get a zoom that could take care of most scenarios, so I don't feel like swapping as much. I do find those extra 4mm on the wide end super fun and useful for most stylistic shots.

Given this, I have always loved the Lumix 24-70 S PRO but after trying out on store I realized the size is simply unmanageable, but the look on that lens is simply something else... I wonder how close the 16-35mm is in terms of rendering, micro contrast and colors? At the same time the 24-60 F2.8 is obviously brighter and a bit more flexible, but I wonder if the rendering would look as good as those primes I had.

Any help (or other recommendations) are welcomed!

reddit.com
u/Malakyas — 2 days ago
▲ 21 r/Lumix

Lumix S5ii case

Got my hard case all set up. In case anyone’s curious what the harbor freight 4800 will hold!

-lumix s5ii with smallrig cage
-lumix 50mm f1.8
-lumix 20-60 kit lens
-lumix 70-300
- 4 batteries
-dual battery charger
-DJI Mic Mini case with mics
-cold show mount fill light
-bag full of cards, cables, attachments, etc.

u/yourmomsfavorite208 — 2 days ago
▲ 126 r/Lumix+3 crossposts

What smaller autofocus L-mount lens options do you use?

Since the latest SL3 firmware, I find myself reaching for my SL3 over my Q2 more and more when I want autofocus. But unlike the Q, the SL3 with a Leica lens is much heavier; when Lumix released their 40mm f/2, I got curious about whether it would bridge that gap enough to give my SL3 a good lightweight travel option.

I’ve been using it for several weeks now, and I found that on the SL3, this Lumix lens balances surprisingly well. It successfully knocks the weight down to a very manageable level for longer walks, and I like that it allows me to use smaller bags than when I have my 50mm APO or the 24-90mm attached. I did a write up along with some sample photos if anyone is interested in this lens here: https://www.konstantinkokoris.com/reviews/lens-review-panasonic-lumix-40m-f2

Aside from using M-mount lenses, has anyone else been using this or found a smaller lens that they like to use on their SL?

u/midnhtsun — 3 days ago
▲ 7 r/Lumix

S5IIX w/ 28-200 kit lens good choice for airshows?

Hey all. I’m somewhere in between a beginner and a novice when it comes to photography, but I’ve been looking at cameras that would suite my purpose.

I came across the S5IIX and it seemed to be a highly regarded camera for what it can do. I’ll mainly be using it for airshows, photography and some video, probably 70/30. I figured the 28-200 kit lens would be a decent lens to get with it to start out… to help with some slight reach when I can’t get too close to the static displays on the ground, but also give me a little bit of a leg up as far as zoom compared to what my iPhone can manage for taking some aerial video.
I don’t need to have any crazy close shots in the air like a lot of professionals can get, this is mainly just for the hobbyist in me.

reddit.com
u/CasioCartel — 2 days ago