
There was a critical line of dialogue missing from the finale fight.
May be a hot take as I know a lot of people loved the episode, but I found the final fight of season 3 really underwhelming. And don't get me wrong, the animation was gorgeous, but that isn't always enough. The character writing just felt... off. A bunch of conflicts and character beats rushed into confusing resolutions so everybody could have a Super Saiyan moment and get to the end of the plot, and it just didn't sit right with me. And after giving it a lot of thought, I think there's one missing line, one that appears in most of Superman's confrontations, which sort of captures what went wrong in the writing of this episode. He never asks Eradicator "Why are you doing this?"
Feels like an especially glaring omission given that we have seen this version of Clark ask his enemies this over and over. It's usually the first thing he says when he winds up fighting someone. But here? He says "It doesn't have to be like this," sure, but then Eradicator throws some fighting words and he grins with Gokuesque battle fervor and says "you heard the man." I don't hate a bit of cheesy camp but this just feels inconsistent with his character, and it leads to a fight to the death which he seems to take with basically no weight on his conscience.
A few episodes ago alt-Jon was averting big fistfights and making peace treaties with the enemy, and Clark was smiling with fatherly pride and saying "this, this is what Superman fights for." So much for that I guess.
Maybe some of this is on my expectations, but the whole episode I was waiting for the moment when Clark comes back and talks to the Eradicator. I kept thinking he was gonna drop that line just like he always does, do something we hadn't seen anybody do yet and actually listen to the fear, let the man speak his piece, and lead into a resolution similar to DCAU Amazo where Eradicator realizes he has no real reason to be attacking them like this. And this wouldn't have sapped the "big climactic battle" energy out of the finale either, because they had TWO heavily signposted brewing conflicts set up with both Lex and Jonathan, and neither of those went anywhere. Jonathan suddenly has a character 180 when Clark tells him "you don't have to be Superman anymore" (which you'd really think would make this character PISSED), and Lex's resolution is even more of a whimper, his device just doesn't even work. (And there's a third if we recall Hank exists.) I kept waiting for Clark to ask the question that would start that dialogue and shift into the "second phase" and he doesn't do it until Eradicator has literally been beaten to pieces. And even then, it comes in the form of a "what's wrong with you?"
And I feel like it was the show's own foreshadowing that led me to these expectations. They wrote the whole Eradicator story like a big red herring, set up like it was a story about Clark's strength of will where some other threat would be the "real fight", and then the red herring was that there was no red herring and it's just a big standard punchout. Hrm. After a season about placing strength of character over superstrength, with this villain who is basically a tormented escaped clone born out of fear and strife and never treated like a person, this was the absolute perfect moment to showcase Clark actually utilizing his talent for resolving situations with communication and understanding, and they wasted it on... Dragon Ball Z reference? Seriously?
Just a huge missed opportunity in my opinion. And a massive waste of Jonathan Lane's character in particular.