CMV: The stigma against alcohol is overhyped and double standard
The current medical consensus is that "there is no safe level of consumption of alcohol" and that "the risks of even moderate drinking outweigh the benefits" (referring the health benefits related to moderate drinking of alcoholic beverages like red wine)
However like anything else everything is harmful dose dependent, following the same logic would they argue that there's no safe exposure level of sunlight? Is there no safe level consumption of yogurt because it has traces of alcohol?
As comparable example to demonstrate a double standard of medical organizations is high mercury fish, the FDA lists yellow fin tuna as a good choice of fish and recommends fish consumption including options like lower mercury like skipjack tuna atleast 3 times a week, but a couple of beers on Saturday is too much? Especially considering that unlike mercury, alcohol isn't something that accumulates in your body eventually causing brain damage among other problems if the concentration gets too high long-term, alcohol is processed like a macronutrient and gets utilized and the byproducts disposed of instantly.
To me this makes at least lower alcoholic concentration beverages are a way safer option than mercury containing fish. This also applies to many unregulated store bought drugs like ibuprofen and Benadryl that many people sober or not will take on a daily basis that can not only damage organs of you take too many at one time but can have effects when taken long-term even in recommended doses but those two drugs are rated at a specific threshold rather than just zero.
To put this into conclusion, there's a threshold for everything and alcoholic beverages are no different.
Can you be healthy and consume alcohol?
Well some countries and regions with well established drinking cultures like Japan or blue zones like Sardinia have exceptionally high life expectancies, even in China alcohol is so well tolerated that public drinking is legal, common and culturally accepted meanwhile countries where alcohol consumption is completely illegal and far less common outside of tourist destinations, even rich countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar or others like Indonesia do not have particularly high life expectancies but have a average life expectancies and that's easily related to their outstanding migrant workforce, they also topple on many of the same health problems observed in the majority of the world today such as heart disease including diabetes which is actually most prominent among muslim South Asia and middle east countries.
I still say though that alcohol can be a slippery slope and has still resulted in social problems, but that does not mean every drinker or every volume of drinking should be assumed as the same.
There's also marijuana and THC containing products, the consensus is than no amount of THC will result in a medical emergency. Are they really sure about this or is this easily just corporate interest interception? Because hospitalizations resulted to THC overdose are still prominent.