ناس كتير بتعمل نفسها بتتناقش وهي فالاصل بتهاجمك ومش بتحاول توصل للحقيقه ولا بتحاول تفهم اي حاجة اصلا
يا ريت لما تتناقش مع حد تفهم الاول هل انت بتتناقش ولا بتهاجم وتبقي صريح مع نفسك هل داخل تطلع بالحقيقه ولا داخل تهاجم الطرف الاخر وتقلل منه
لان ناس كتير بتكدب وتقولك انا بتناقش وهي اصلا مخادعه وداخله تهاجمك خلاص يبقي افتحها عالبحري وقضيها هجوم وبطل تقضي وقتك تقنع نفسك بشئ مش حقيقي انه نقاش وهو فالاصل كان هجوم
r/Upwork is genuinely one of the most useless freelancing communities on Reddit. Half the posts are people catastrophizing about Upwork, Connects, scams, bans, or some client who offered $5, while the other half is recycled advice. Ask anything remotely nuanced and you'll get the same generic garbage: “send better proposals,”
At that point, it’s less of a freelancing community and more of a support group for people who are frustrated with freelancing. If your goal is actually to get better at business, marketing, sales, or freelancing, you can waste hours there and walk away with nothing.
Is it better to stun multiple enemies at once using the R–E combo, or to use R to execute the highest-value enemy?
Clients are inherently human and far from infallible; they can miscommunicate, demand out-of-scope work, or leave vindictive ratings out of personal frustration, clients can also be wrong, unfair, or leave feedback that misrepresents what actually happened. That’s why Upwork should bring back the ability to remove feedback in legitimate cases. The goal isn’t to let freelancers erase every negative review, but to give them a fair way to challenge unfair or misleading feedback and protect their reputation when the client is clearly at fault.
مفيش ليه حاجات عن الفاينانس نفسها ليه مصممين تملوا الجروب بورصه مع ان دي فيها مكسب وخساره ومكسبك مش مضمون
90% من المستثمرين بيخسروا
ازاي جروب فاينانس كله عن الكريبتو
Every 30-minute match of League of Legends generates millions of quantifiable data points: lane positioning, resource conversion efficiency, objective pressure, ability accuracy, and damage per gold spent.
Yet, the current ranked system does something mathematically indefensible: it discards 99% of that data and compresses the entire match down to a single binary digit, a 1 or a 0 (Win or Loss).
From a data-science perspective, throwing away high-dimensional performance data in favor of a single binary outcome is the slowest, least efficient method of statistical convergence in existence. It is the reason the system demands a massive 300+ game sample size to determine your true skill level.
Here is the quiet reality: the game already knows how well you played.
Riot's internal engine already grades your match from D- to S+ by comparing your specific performance against millions of other players on that exact champion in that exact role. The data is already captured, calculated, and stored. The ranked system simply chooses to ignore it at the LP screen..
I’ve tried a lot of strategies, both in and out of the game, but the only sensible solution when you’re losing a lot of games is to stop playing for a while. Once you get tilted, your performance usually drops, and continuing to queue can turn a bad streak into an even worse one. Other than that, “just get good” isn’t practical advice, improving takes time, and being a better player doesn’t guarantee that your team will perform well every game.
of Course you gotta play a lot if you are winning, Don't play if you are losing it's a waste of time most of the time you won't learn anything
Nobody has ever debunked 'loser's queue.' We all know there's a winner's queue and a loser's queue, and the thing about the skeptics is that they've never been able to disprove it. why most players win rates hover around 50% across all ranks. That can't happen if there's no loser's queue. Even the best players end up with roughly 50% win rates despite trying their best. Riot's goal is to maximize engagement, not to provide fair games
Players notice win rates cluster near 50% no matter how skilled they are.
If skill determined outcomes, better players should sustain win rates well above 50%.
Since even strong players regress to ~50%, something outside individual skill must be pulling results back to even i.e., the matchmaker is deliberately placing some players in "winning" teams and others in "losing" teams in a way that isn't just organic skill balance.
They stack unperforming, unlucky, tilted, and even trolling players onto the same team, creating games that feel practically unwinnable from the start
عاملين جروب تليجرام للقراءة والنقاش، مش بس عن الكتب، لكن عن الأفكار والآراء وكل المواضيع اللي تستحق نقاشًا حقيقيًا.
الفكرة ببساطة: مساحة مفتوحة للناس اللي بتحب تقرأ، تفكر، وتسمع وجهات نظر مختلفة، من غير ما يكون الحوار محصور في موضوع واحد.
لو حابب تنضم وتشارك، اكتب كومنت وهبعتلك اللينك.
We should be allowed to dodge whenever we want, and names should appear in match select. Riot doesn't own us to lock people out of the game for 12 hours for simple dodging. This is so excessive and unhuman. People should stop buying skins because this company treats people like trash. Like, what the heck? 12 hours for dodging a game? This is so unhuman
I'm looking for advice from experienced, Master+ League of Legends players who have been playing the game for a long time. How do you actually win games? What the most effective strategy and the thing that you think can help you win you most of your games, play at Master MMR myself, but I still haven't figured out how to consistently carry in high elo. Obviously, playing well and farming are important, but I know there are levels beyond that.
Riot matchmaking system designed to extend losing streaks by consistently pairing you with teammates who have recently been performing poorly or are also on losing streaks.
As you can see, there is a clear contrast between the two teams: the right side is filled with players who have been losing recently, while the left side is filled with players who have been winning. This kind of matchmaking raises questions about whether the teams were truly balanced.
the blue team consists almost entirely of players on losing streaks with poor recent performance, whereas the red team is composed of players who have been winning and performing well. If the goal of matchmaking were to create fair, balanced games, you would expect these players to be distributed more evenly between both teams. Instead, the imbalance strongly suggests that the system deliberately grouped unlucky or struggling players together, making another loss far more likely.
After 13 years of playing and reaching Diamond 1– Master Rank , I’ve figured out how the matchmaking system really works. To climb, you need to follow one strict rule: stop playing or switch accounts after 2-3 losses, even if those losses weren’t your fault.
The system seems designed to push everyone toward a 50% win rate, often by giving you bad and worse teammates while putting you against stronger opponents during losing streaks. Recognizing this pattern and knowing when to stop will help you maintain your rank while everyone else keeps losing theirs trying to "get back" to where they were.
There is no "get back" button. Once you start queuing after losing, the system will keep throwing difficult games at you, and you’ll only dig yourself deeper.
بنك اسكندريه قرر يعمل باقه شهريه من نفسه محدش طلبها اصلا وب110 جنيه فالشهر بس الحمد لله انا لغيتها علشان ترجع للنظام القديم الي هو 150 جنيه كل 3 شهور لان لو انت سيبتهم يحلبوك كل شهر هتلاقي نفسك متداينلهم وانت مش واخد بالك
https://www.alexbank.com/retail/Banking-Bundles.html
الي عملوه دا مش قانوني اصلا لان ينص قانون البنك المركزي المصري على حظر تقديم أي خدمات أو منتجات بنكية تتطلب مقابل مالي، أو إجراء أي تغيير في خصائص حسابات العملاء، إلا بعد الحصول على موافقة مسبقة ومثبتة (كتابياً أو إلكترونياً عبر القنوات المعتمدة) من العميل.
انت هتلاقي نفسك متحول لباقه انت مطلبتهاش اصلا
انا بنصح اي حد في بنك اسكندريه يتصل عليهم ويلغي الهري دا حرفيا مفيش ميزة انت بتقدمهالي علشان تاخد مني 110 جنيه فالشهر بدل ما تلاقي الحوار اتعمم لان البنوك اصلا حراميه
It is highly problematic that Reddit allows subreddits to be run by moderators who harbor deep hostility toward the very companies and communities they represent. A clear example of this is r/Upwork, where users are frequently attacked without reason simply for asking questions. The moderators of this community are openly hostile toward freelancers, dislike Upwork itself, and seem to actively wish for its failure. Reddit should step in to ensure these individuals are restricted to unofficial, unrelated spaces rather than being allowed to run the primary hub for Upwork discussions
I wanted to buy AWUS036AXM (MT7921AUN) but I'm not fully sure if it will work on fluxion or not.
How can I consistently maintain 10 CS per minute throughout an entire game like professional players and high-ELO players, rather than only during the laning phase? What separates players who can reliably achieve this level of farming from everyone else?
How to stop facebook from hiding "People you may know", sometimes it just disappears for days or weeks without any reason, it gives suggestins of people you may know.
Matchmaking doesn't feel random, it feels engineered. The pattern of getting paired with bad or tilted teammates in calculated streaks seems designed to keep players engaged rather than to create fair games. At this point, it's hard to see it as anything but rigged.
You can be the exact same player, same game sense, same strategic decisions, yet end up with wildly different results depending on which account you're on. One account sits comfortably in high Master, another struggles in low Master, despite identical play. If skill alone determined rank, that kind of variance shouldn't exist, It is luck based poker game.
