▲ 19 r/Muslimbenefits+1 crossposts

Modesty Is Not a Fashion Accessory

If you think you can pair modesty with whatever is fashionable and call it hijab, then sadly, you have not understood the concept of modesty that Allah تعالى commanded .

Hijab is not just placing a scarf on your head while wearing jeans, a fitted abaya that outlines the body or leaving the chest uncovered. The clothing itself has conditions . It should cover properly , be loose rather than tight, be thick and non-transparent and not be designed in a way that attracts attention . It should also not resemble men's clothing or be a garment of fame and display .

The Prophet ﷺ warned about women who would be “ clothed yet naked .” The problem today is that the hijab has slowly become an aesthetic .

A fitted abaya is called modest, a half-niqab becomes an accessory and covering a few parts is enough to label the whole outfit as a hijab.

But calling something hijab does not make it hijab.

And this becomes even more concerning when influencers turn these styles into something young Muslim women want to imitate. Because hijab is not a trend to follow. It is an act of obedience .

So don't let social media teach you what hijab is. Learn it from the Qur’an and Sunnah .

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 10 days ago
▲ 7 r/Muslimbenefits+2 crossposts

Shaykh Saleh Al al-Sheikh on the Dangers of Constant Short-Form Content Consumption

“The first thing these endless short clips drain is mental focus. Those fast, quick-cut videos on different platforms, the reels & similar content, disrupt the mind.

A person gradually loses ability to sit with something deeply for more than five minutes. The mind becomes restless. It stops being able to focus and reflect.”

u/FrontFaith74 — 14 days ago

Learn to save water while making wudu.

Water is a blessing from Allah, and millions of people around the world suffer from water scarcity. Islam teaches us not to waste this blessing.

The Prophet ﷺ taught us to avoid wasting water, even if we are beside a flowing river.

So make your wudu properly, but do not use more water than you need. Saving water is part of responsibility, gratitude, and following the Sunnah.

#Reshared

youtu.be
u/FrontFaith74 — 15 days ago

The Day of Ashura (10th of Muharram)

The Reason Muslims fast on Ashura to express gratitude to Allah for saving Prophet Musa alaihisalam and the Children of Israel from Pharaoh by miraculously splitting the Red Sea. Prophet Musa fasted on this day in thanksgiving, a tradition the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) revived and encouraged.

*Importance & Virtues*

*• Expiation of Sins:* Fasting on this day wipes away the minor sins of the entire preceding year.

*• Prime Voluntary Fast:* It falls in Muharram, described by the Prophet (ﷺ) as "the Month of Allah" and the one of the best months for optional fasting after Ramadan.

*Key Evidence*

“The Messenger of Allah ﷺ was asked about fasting the day of Ashura. He said: ‘I hope that Allah will accept it as expiation for the sins committed in the previous year.’”— *Sahih Muslim*

Recommended Practice To distinguish the Islamic practice from other traditions, the Prophet (ﷺ) expressed the intent to fast an additional day. Therefore, scholars highly recommend fasting both the *9th and 10th of Muharram* or *the 10th and 11th of Muharram.*

  • Copied
reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago
▲ 73 r/SalafiCentral+1 crossposts

Noteworthy Aspects With Regards to the Incident at Karbala

Is it possible for a believer to even imagine casting doubt on the honor of the Sahaaba, may Allah be pleased with them? But at the same time, it is very disturbing to see the Ahl-us-Sunnah perceive the martyrdom of Hazrat Hussain (RA) in the same rhythm and rhetoric, as the Shi'as.

The belief that the tragedy of Karbala is a battle between truth and falsehood actually amounts to undermining the noble character of the Sahaaba and their religious integrity, and this is the aim of the Shia. But the important point is, for us to think whether this was actually the case or not?

The fact is that it was not a clash of truth and falsehood; it was not a battle of disbelief and Islam; and it was not an Islamic Jihad. Had this been the case, Hazrat Hussain (RA) would not have been alone in this path; he would have had the support of those Sahaabah (RA) who spent their entire lives in making the Word of Allah supreme, who always had their swords bare against falsehood and rose up as a divine challenge in confronting disbelief.

The following aspects are worth considering in understanding the point that this conflict was actually of a political nature:

Events related to Karbala are recorded in history that when Hazrat Hussain (RA) was ready to march towards Kufa, his relatives and sympathizers tried their best to stop him and informed him of the dangerous consequences of such a move. Among them, Hazrat Abdullah bin Umar, Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudri, Hazrat Abu Darda, Hazrat Abu Waqid Laithi, Jabir bin Abdullah, Hazrat Abdullah bin Abbas and Hazrat Hussain's brother Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiyya (RA) were prominent. In response to them, he neither postponed his journey nor put forth any argument for his stance. Otherwise, they would have been willing to cooperate with him in his position. In fact, Hazrat Hussain (RA) beleived that the insistence of the people of Kufa in inviting him to Kufa was sincere in its urgency, and surely going there must be beneficial.

It is also mentioned in history that while he was on his way, news reached him that his cousin Muslim bin Aqeel had been martyred in Kufa, whom he had sent to find out the situation in Kufa. With this tragic news, his trust in the people of Kufa was shaken, and he expressed his desire to return, but the brothers of Hazrat Muslim (may Allah have mercy on him) refused to return saying, “We will avenge our brother Muslim or we will die.” Hazrat Hussain (RA) said: "What will I do without you?"

(Taariq al Tabri 4/292 Matba’tul Istiqaamah, Cairo 1939)

And hence the journey of this caravan continued towards Kufa.

Moreover, all histories agree that when Hazrat Hussain (RA) reached the place of Karbala, the Governor of Kufa, Ibn Ziyad forced Umar bin Sa'd to confront Hazrat Hussain (RA). Umar bin Sa’d came and talked to him; and according to several historical narrations, Hazrat Hussain (RA) put the following proposal before him; 'Accept one of these three things: I either go to an Islamic frontier or return to Madinah or else I (go directly) to Yazid bin Muawiyah and pledge allegiance to him. Umar bin Sa’d accepted this proposal. (Al-Isabah: 2/71, printed 1995, Dar ul Kutub Al Ilmiyyah).

After Ibn Sa'd had accepted this, he sent the proposal to Ibn Ziyad (Governor of Kufa), but the Governor refused to accept the proposal and insisted that he first pledge allegiance (to Yazid) at “my hand”.

Hazrat Hussain (RA) did not agree with this as his self-dignity did not allow it, so he rejected this provision; upon which the war broke out, and the tragic incident of his martyrdom took place. (Isaabah, 2/71, Al-Tabari 4/293) "فانا للہ وانا الیہ راجعون۔

Indeed, we all belong to Allah and to Him we shall return.

The above-mentioned words of the narration in which Hazrat Hussain (RA) expressed his consent to pledge allegiance to Yazid can be found in "Al-Isaabah",

Tahzib al-Tahzeeb, 328/2, 353, Tarikh al-Tabari, 293/4, Tahzeeb Tarikh Ibn Asakir, 325/4, 337, Al-Bidaayah wa Al-Nihaayah, 170/8, 175, Kamil Ibn Athir, 283. /3 and many other books; even in the books of Shia! Though they have other words too, but they do not make any significant difference in terms of the result.

From these historical proofs, it is evident that had it been a battle of truth and falsehood, Hazrat Hussain (RA) would not have shown determination to turn back after getting the news of Muslim bin Aqeel's martyrdom upon nearing Kufa. It is obvious that the duty of vindication of truth and falsification of falsehood is not waived off by the martyrdom of someone in the path of truth.

From the terms of reconciliation that Hazrat Hussain (RA) put before Umar bin Sa'd, it becomes very clear that though he had initial reservations in his mind about Yazid, but later he expressed his willingness to accept the sovereignty of Yazid.

One more thing that is clear from this is that Hussain (RA) did not consider Amir Yazid as a transgressor or unfit for government. If that was the case, he would not have been ready to pledge allegiance to Yazid. His demand to go to Yazid also shows that he expected good treatment from him. No one longs (even as a last resort) to meet a cruel and tyrannical king.

From this description, the people who were responsible for this tragedy were also exposed, and that is Ibn Ziyad's army, who were all the same Kufis who had written letters and invited him, and these were the very same people who caused the reconciliation efforts of Umar bin Sa’d to fail, which led to the tragic martyrdom of Karbala.

{And the command of Allah is a decree determined} وَكَانَ أَمْرُ ٱللَّهِ قَدَرًا مَّقْدُورًا

For more details, kindly refer to other articles of the book named, Saaniha-e-Karbala Pasmanzar aur Asbaab

Excerpted from the book "Rusumaat e Muharram ul Haram and Saaniha-e- Karbala”

by Salahuddin Yusuf. May Allah have mercy on him.

Sheikh Abdus Salam al-Madani

Founder,

Aspire College of Excellence

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago

Noteworthy Aspects With Regards to the Incident at Karbala

Is it possible for a believer to even imagine casting doubt on the honor of the Sahaaba, may Allah be pleased with them? But at the same time, it is very disturbing to see the Ahl-us-Sunnah perceive the martyrdom of Hazrat Hussain (RA) in the same rhythm and rhetoric, as the Shi'as.

The belief that the tragedy of Karbala is a battle between truth and falsehood actually amounts to undermining the noble character of the Sahaaba and their religious integrity, and this is the aim of the Shia. But the important point is, for us to think whether this was actually the case or not?

The fact is that it was not a clash of truth and falsehood; it was not a battle of disbelief and Islam; and it was not an Islamic Jihad. Had this been the case, Hazrat Hussain (RA) would not have been alone in this path; he would have had the support of those Sahaabah (RA) who spent their entire lives in making the Word of Allah supreme, who always had their swords bare against falsehood and rose up as a divine challenge in confronting disbelief.

The following aspects are worth considering in understanding the point that this conflict was actually of a political nature:

Events related to Karbala are recorded in history that when Hazrat Hussain (RA) was ready to march towards Kufa, his relatives and sympathizers tried their best to stop him and informed him of the dangerous consequences of such a move. Among them, Hazrat Abdullah bin Umar, Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudri, Hazrat Abu Darda, Hazrat Abu Waqid Laithi, Jabir bin Abdullah, Hazrat Abdullah bin Abbas and Hazrat Hussain's brother Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiyya (RA) were prominent. In response to them, he neither postponed his journey nor put forth any argument for his stance. Otherwise, they would have been willing to cooperate with him in his position. In fact, Hazrat Hussain (RA) beleived that the insistence of the people of Kufa in inviting him to Kufa was sincere in its urgency, and surely going there must be beneficial.

It is also mentioned in history that while he was on his way, news reached him that his cousin Muslim bin Aqeel had been martyred in Kufa, whom he had sent to find out the situation in Kufa. With this tragic news, his trust in the people of Kufa was shaken, and he expressed his desire to return, but the brothers of Hazrat Muslim (may Allah have mercy on him) refused to return saying, “We will avenge our brother Muslim or we will die.” Hazrat Hussain (RA) said: "What will I do without you?"

(Taariq al Tabri 4/292 Matba’tul Istiqaamah, Cairo 1939)

And hence the journey of this caravan continued towards Kufa.

Moreover, all histories agree that when Hazrat Hussain (RA) reached the place of Karbala, the Governor of Kufa, Ibn Ziyad forced Umar bin Sa'd to confront Hazrat Hussain (RA). Umar bin Sa’d came and talked to him; and according to several historical narrations, Hazrat Hussain (RA) put the following proposal before him; 'Accept one of these three things: I either go to an Islamic frontier or return to Madinah or else I (go directly) to Yazid bin Muawiyah and pledge allegiance to him. Umar bin Sa’d accepted this proposal. (Al-Isabah: 2/71, printed 1995, Dar ul Kutub Al Ilmiyyah).

After Ibn Sa'd had accepted this, he sent the proposal to Ibn Ziyad (Governor of Kufa), but the Governor refused to accept the proposal and insisted that he first pledge allegiance (to Yazid) at “my hand”.

Hazrat Hussain (RA) did not agree with this as his self-dignity did not allow it, so he rejected this provision; upon which the war broke out, and the tragic incident of his martyrdom took place. (Isaabah, 2/71, Al-Tabari 4/293) "فانا للہ وانا الیہ راجعون۔

Indeed, we all belong to Allah and to Him we shall return.

The above-mentioned words of the narration in which Hazrat Hussain (RA) expressed his consent to pledge allegiance to Yazid can be found in "Al-Isaabah",

Tahzib al-Tahzeeb, 328/2, 353, Tarikh al-Tabari, 293/4, Tahzeeb Tarikh Ibn Asakir, 325/4, 337, Al-Bidaayah wa Al-Nihaayah, 170/8, 175, Kamil Ibn Athir, 283. /3 and many other books; even in the books of Shia! Though they have other words too, but they do not make any significant difference in terms of the result.

From these historical proofs, it is evident that had it been a battle of truth and falsehood, Hazrat Hussain (RA) would not have shown determination to turn back after getting the news of Muslim bin Aqeel's martyrdom upon nearing Kufa. It is obvious that the duty of vindication of truth and falsification of falsehood is not waived off by the martyrdom of someone in the path of truth.

From the terms of reconciliation that Hazrat Hussain (RA) put before Umar bin Sa'd, it becomes very clear that though he had initial reservations in his mind about Yazid, but later he expressed his willingness to accept the sovereignty of Yazid.

One more thing that is clear from this is that Hussain (RA) did not consider Amir Yazid as a transgressor or unfit for government. If that was the case, he would not have been ready to pledge allegiance to Yazid. His demand to go to Yazid also shows that he expected good treatment from him. No one longs (even as a last resort) to meet a cruel and tyrannical king.

From this description, the people who were responsible for this tragedy were also exposed, and that is Ibn Ziyad's army, who were all the same Kufis who had written letters and invited him, and these were the very same people who caused the reconciliation efforts of Umar bin Sa’d to fail, which led to the tragic martyrdom of Karbala.

{And the command of Allah is a decree determined} وَكَانَ أَمْرُ ٱللَّهِ قَدَرًا مَّقْدُورًا

For more details, kindly refer to other articles of the book named, Saaniha-e-Karbala Pasmanzar aur Asbaab

Excerpted from the book "Rusumaat e Muharram ul Haram and Saaniha-e- Karbala”

by Salahuddin Yusuf. May Allah have mercy on him.

Sheikh Abdus Salam al-Madani

Founder,

Aspire College of Excellence

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago
▲ 9 r/islam

A Father’s Role

We often hear about the importance of a mother’s role in raising children, and rightly so. However, the role of a father is equally important and should never be overlooked.

A father’s responsibility is not limited to providing financial support and covering his children’s living expenses. His role goes far beyond that. He must strive to cultivate good morals and character in his children and help them establish a strong relationship with their Creator through worship and obedience.

Children need a father who guides them, advises them, spends time with them, listens to them, teaches them good manners, and nurtures their relationship with Allah.

A father should be concerned about his children’s character just as much as their education, their prayers just as much as their future careers, and their hearts just as much as their physical well-being.

Children do not only need a provider. They need a role model, a teacher, a protector, and a source of wisdom and guidance.

A father’s words, presence, and involvement can shape a child’s life for years to come. Many problems can be prevented when a father is actively engaged in the upbringing of his children.

This is an `important reminder` for those seeking marriage and for those who hope to have children in the future. Preparing for fatherhood begins long before a child is born. *A man should work on himself, strengthen his character, increase his knowledge, improve his relationship with Allah, and develop the qualities* needed to lead and nurture a family.

May Allah bless our fathers, forgive those who have passed away, and aid every father in fulfilling the trust that Allah has placed upon his shoulders.

—Copied

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago

A Father’s Role

We often hear about the importance of a mother’s role in raising children, and rightly so. However, the role of a father is equally important and should never be overlooked.

A father’s responsibility is not limited to providing financial support and covering his children’s living expenses. His role goes far beyond that. He must strive to cultivate good morals and character in his children and help them establish a strong relationship with their Creator through worship and obedience.

Children need a father who guides them, advises them, spends time with them, listens to them, teaches them good manners, and nurtures their relationship with Allah

A father should be concerned about his children’s character just as much as their education their prayers just as much as their future careers and their hearts just as much as their physical well-being.

Children do not only need a provider. They need a role model, a teacher, a protector, and a source of wisdom and guidance

A father’s words, presence, and involvement can shape a child’s life for years to come. Many problems can be prevented when a father is actively engaged in the upbringing of his children.

This is an important reminder for those seeking marriage and for those who hope to have children in the future. Preparing for fatherhood begins long before a child is born. A man should work on himself, strengthen his character, increase his knowledge, improve his relationship with Allah, and develop the qualities, needed to lead and nurture a family.

May Allah bless our fathers, forgive those who have passed away, and aid every father in fulfilling the trust that Allah has placed upon his shoulders.

—Copied

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago

A Father’s Role

We often hear about the importance of a mother’s role in raising children, and rightly so. However, the role of a father is equally important and should never be overlooked.

A father’s responsibility is not limited to providing financial support and covering his children’s living expenses. His role goes far beyond that. He must strive to cultivate good morals and character in his children and help them establish a strong relationship with their Creator through worship and obedience.

Children need a father who guides them, advises them, spends time with them, listens to them, teaches them good manners, and nurtures their relationship with Allah

A father should be concerned about his children’s character just as much as their education their prayers just as much as their future careers and their hearts just as much as their physical well-being.

Children do not only need a provider. They need a role model, a teacher, a protector, and a source of wisdom and guidance

A father’s words, presence, and involvement can shape a child’s life for years to come. Many problems can be prevented when a father is actively engaged in the upbringing of his children.

This is an important reminder for those seeking marriage and for those who hope to have children in the future. Preparing for fatherhood begins long before a child is born. A man should work on himself, strengthen his character, increase his knowledge, improve his relationship with Allah, and develop the qualities, needed to lead and nurture a family.

May Allah bless our fathers, forgive those who have passed away, and aid every father in fulfilling the trust that Allah has placed upon his shoulders.

—Copied

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago

The Three Cases of Male Facial Hair in Wudu | 𝗠𝗲𝗻'𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀

Male Facial Hairs

The poet writes:

شعُوْرُ وَجْهٍ غَمَمٌ وَشَارِبُ * وَهَدْبُ عَيْنٍ ثُمَّ فَوْقُ الْحَاجِبُ

  1. The hair of the face (ghamam x1),
  2. The moustache (shaarib x1),
  3. The eyelashes (hadb x2), and then
  4. The hair above it; the eyebrows (haajib x2).

عَنْفَقَةٌ مَعَ السِّبَالِ وَاللِّحْيَ * وَعَارِضًا بَعْدَ الْعِذَارٍ أَصْلِحَا

There is also:

  1. The small hair under the lower lip ('anfaqah x1), together with

  2. The sides of the moustache (sibaal x2),

  3. The beard (lihya x3), and

  4. The sideburns ('aaridh x2), then

  5. The hairline of the ear ('idhaar x2).

وَشَعَرُ الْخَدَّيْنِ ثُمَّ النَّفْكَتَيْنَ * عِشْرُونَ هَاكَ عَدَّهَا بِغَيْرِ مَيْنْ

Then there is:

  1. The hair of the two cheeks (x2), and

  2. The hair between the lower lip and chin (nafkah x2).

These are twenty types — count them without error.

Source: https://t.me/Menzbenefits/473

The Three Cases of Male Facial Hair in Wudu

Sheikh 'Abdussalam Ash-Shuwa'ir (hafidhahullah) states:

Thick hair is either located on an area that is wiped, or on an area that is washed. If it is on an area that is wiped, then there is no doubt that takhleel (running the fingers through it to make water reach inside) is not prescribed, because what is required is only to wipe the hair itself, not to separate it and reach underneath it.

But if the hair is on an area that is washed, such as the face; as the face is an area that must be washed, and there are many types of facial hair, including the moustache, eyebrows, eyelashes, sideburns, beard, and the two small patches of hair beside the mouth (the subaalatan). The well-known view of the Hanbali madhhab is that these two patches are considered part of the moustache, so it is recommended to trim them. The Shafi'i scholars said they are part of the beard, so it is recommended to leave them. The closer view is what I mentioned to you according to the Hanbali madhhab. There is also the small hair patch under the lower lip ('anfaqah). All of these are called facial hair.

This facial hair has three situations:

▪️ The first situation:

The hair is within the required area of the face and it is thin. The required area of the face means the boundary we mentioned: from where the normal hairline begins downwards to the bottom of the chin, and from one ear to the other sidewards. This is the area that must be washed. Thin means the skin can be seen underneath it.

In this case, what must be washed is the skin itself. For example, the fine hair on the cheeks, or a moustache that is thin enough for the skin to show through it. In this case, the skin must be washed.

Actually, when you pour water over your face, the water will naturally reach it because the hair is thin. So this happens automatically.

▪️ The second situation:

The hair is thick and within the required area of the face, meaning it covers the skin so that the skin colour cannot be seen. For example, thick eyebrows, or some people's thick beards and sideburns.

In this case, only the surface of the hair must be washed.

Imam An-Nawawi said that according to the consensus of the scholars, water does not have to reach the skin underneath, and it is not prescribed or even a Sunnah to make the water reach the skin.

So the requirement is to wash the surface of the hair. It is recommended to run the fingers through the inside of the hair (takhleel), but it is not prescribed to make the water reach the skin.

How is this done? For example, with eyelashes or a beard that is within the face boundary: when you bring water, you wash the visible outer part. Trying to wash the skin underneath by forcing water through it is not prescribed. Washing the eyebrows just to make water reach the skin is not prescribed either. According to the scholars, it is not Sunnah and not obligatory; it may even be regarded an innovation.

So this is the second type: washing the outside of the hair.

As for the beard, it is recommended to run the fingers through it (takhleel). How is this done? They said: by wetting the hand and inserting the fingers into the beard. There are two ways:

For the sideburns: lift the hair like this.

For the beard: put the fingers inside the beard.

This is clear now regarding the inner part of the hair.

Now, regarding the neck: according to the consensus of the scholars, the neck is not part of the face, so washing it is not prescribed.

If someone says that there is a narration in Sunan Abi Dawud that he took water and put it under his chin, we say: first, this narration is not authentic. Even if we considered it authentic, it would be understood as making water reach the beard for the purpose of takhleel (running the fingers through it), not for reaching the skin underneath.

Because even the skin under facial hair within the required face area does not need water to reach it, as Imam An-Nawawi said. It is not prescribed. So it is even more obvious that this applies to the neck, which is not part of the face at all.

The neck, by agreement of the scholars, is not part of the face. Several scholars stated that it is not washed together with the face, and the hair growing on it is not considered facial hair. It has a separate ruling.

▪️ The third situation:

The hair extends beyond the face boundary. For example, when a person has a long beard that is longer than the face itself.

The hair that extends out from the face: it is only recommended to wash the outside of it.

So:

• If thick hair is within the face boundary, the outside of it MUST be washed.

• If the thick hair extends beyond the face boundary, washing the outside is RECOMMENDED.

Source: https://t.me/Menzbenefits/474

u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago

Congratulations for the Islamic New Year?

Questioner: He says: “Eminent Shaykh, Allāh grant you success, many people exchange congratulations upon the advent of the new Hijrī year: what is the ruling on giving congratulations at its commencement? From the statements they use is: ‘Happy New Year’, or: ‘May you be well every year.’ Is this legislated?”

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān حفظه الله said:

This is a bidʿah; this is a bidʿah, and it resembles the congratulations given by the Christians for the Gregorian New Year. This is something the Salaf did not do. Furthermore, the Hijrī year is only a terminology among the terminologies of the Ṣaḥābah purely for the sake of dating business dealings. Purely for the sake of dating business dealings. They did not make it an ʿīd (festival), or that it is congratulated for, and this and that. This has no basis to it. The Ṣaḥābah only made it for dating business dealings, and precisely recording transactions. That is it.

Tr: Abū ʿAbd Allāh Ayman al-Hindī

reddit.com
u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago
▲ 82 r/TrueDeen+2 crossposts

Islam Stands Free From Terrorism: Unpacking the Real Roots of Extremism Shaykh Sulaymān al-Ruhaylī (حفظه الله)

u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago
▲ 40 r/TrueDeen+1 crossposts

Four Reasons Not to Watch Football || FIFA World cup 2026 || Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīn رحمه الله

u/FrontFaith74 — 4 months ago