u/Jorge_Reynoso112

▲ 154 r/atheism

How do you guys deal with these terrible apologist "gotchas"? (Abortion, porn, socialism)

i keep seeing these conservative christian apologists drop the same lazy arguments online and it's honestly exhausting. they think they're doing something clever, but it's just massive strawman arguments and false equivalences.
they usually say stuff like:
"atheists say MURDER is wrong, but they support ABORTION."
"atheists say RAPE is wrong, but they promote PORNOGRAPHY."
"atheists say THEFT is wrong, but they defend SOCIALISM."
like... do they even try to understand logic for five minutes?
first of all, abortion isn't murder. a fetus in early stages doesn't have self-awareness. but what they completely ignore is bodily autonomy. no one has the right to use someone else's body without consent. forcing a woman into an unwanted pregnancy just leads to severe child abuse, unwanted kids, and human suffering. we want wanted pregnancies, not hidden tragedies.
second, comparing porn to rape is disgusting. secular morality is based on consent and reducing harm. rape is a horrific crime because there is no consent. ethical porn is literally just consenting adults doing a job. sure, the traditional porn industry is full of exploitation and human trafficking, and we should completely reject that toxic garbage. but supporting ethical, feminist-made content that respects the actors is not the same as promoting abuse.
and finally, taxes and social programs aren't "theft," it's called a social contract. it's about investing in health, education, and infrastructure so society actually functions. letting people starve to death while the rich hoard wealth is way more immoral than redistributing resources through democratic laws. they don't even know the difference between private property and personal property.
morality doesn't come from their god, it comes from empathy and reason. we condemn actual harm (murder, rape, real theft) while defending individual freedoms that don't hurt anyone.
how do you guys usually shut down these specific talking points when they pop up? because the mental gymnastics are driving me crazy.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 7 hours ago
▲ 358 r/atheism

what's up with conservative apologists using the worst strawman arguments ever?

i keep seeing these viral posts from christians saying stuff like "atheists think murder is wrong but support abortion, think rape is wrong but promote porn, think theft is wrong but defend socialism." it's honestly exhausting. it’s all just cheap strawman arguments and false equivalences. first, abortion isn’t murder. a fetus in early stages isn't a person, and nobody has the right to use someone else's body without consent. forcing someone to give birth just leads to unwanted kids and human misery. second, comparing rape to porn is disgusting. rape is about lack of consent and violence. ethical porn is adults making a choice. yeah, the mainstream industry has terrible exploitation that needs to be called out, but feminist ethical content is based on human dignity and respect. consent is the entire boundary. and third, taxes for social programs aren't "theft," it's a social contract so people don't starve to death while billionaires hoard wealth. they don't even know the difference between private and personal property. our morality comes from empathy and reducing harm, not from some book. anyone else sick of these brainless takes?

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 1 day ago
▲ 900 r/atheism

Religious indoctrination of minors is child abuse, period

I’m tired of being "polite" about this. We talk about protecting kids from all sorts of harm, but we look the other way when parents fill a child’s developing brain with threats of eternal torture.
Here is why this needs to be called what it is: psychological abuse.
1. The Fear Factory: Telling a 6-year-old they will burn forever if they think "bad thoughts" isn't "moral guidance." It's emotional terrorism. It creates anxiety and OCD patterns that take decades of therapy to undo.
2. The Death of Curiosity: Baptism and catechism don't teach kids how to think; they teach them what to believe. It’s a literal lobotomy of their natural skepticism. We are essentially forcing "software" into a hardware that isn't ready to defend itself.
3. Consent doesn't exist: A baby can't consent to being "claimed" by a church. Forcing a ritual on a minor to "save their soul" is a violation of their bodily and mental autonomy.
4. Stunted Empathy: Religious education often teaches kids that "we" are the saved ones and "they" (the atheists, the "sinners," the LGBTQ+) are broken. That’s not morality; that’s tribalism and it rots empathy from the inside out.
5. Science vs. Fairy Tales: Every hour spent memorizing dogmas is an hour stolen from learning about the universe, biology, and actual critical thinking. We are handicapping the next generation by giving them myths instead of tools.
Children don’t need the fear of a "genocidal celestial dictator" to be good people. They need science, empathy, and the right to grow up without being told they are "born dirty." We need to stop respecting the "right" of parents to break their children's minds in the name of faith.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 13 days ago

I’m being brutally honest here: I can't even take care of myself half the time, so forcing a child into existence just to satisfy a social script is insane. As someone on the spectrum, I know for a fact the sensory and emotional toll would make me resent the kid. I’m not built to be a "provider" in this hyper-expensive, soul-crushing system. Beyond my own limitations, there's the fear of the world they’d face. I refuse to expand the "business of guilt." I won't indoctrinate a child into religious trauma or make them a potential victim of clerical abuse. The thought of my child ending up on a "missing person" poster in today's climate is enough to stop me.
I’m done with the cycle. I won't be an accomplice to a system that breeds suffering and calls it "tradition."

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 17 days ago

I need to break down one of the most dangerous arguments I’ve faced in my deconstruction: the idea that Hell isn’t a punishment, but a "choice" that God respects.
The argument says: "God is love, so He respects your freedom enough to let you choose an eternity without Him." They call it divine justice—giving you exactly what you "picked" in life.
But let’s look at the logic. If I am an autistic person who values human rights, bodily autonomy, and sexual freedom, they tell me I am "choosing" Hell because I:
• Support LGBTQ+ rights and abortion access.
• Watch porn, masturbate, or have premarital sex.
• Chose voluntary sterilization and a childfree, antinatalist life.
• Use pagan archetypes (like Lilith or Hecate) to build my identity.
This isn’t "respecting my freedom." If you tell someone, "Love me or I’ll let you burn in a pit of despair," that isn't a choice; it’s a threat. It’s a projection of the human ego—masculine hunger for power and control disguised as "divine love."
My neurodivergent brain is collapsing under this. Taking things literally means I see this for what it is: coercion, narcissism, and systemic injustice. Calling it "free will" is just a way to make the victim responsible for the perpetrator's cruelty.
How can it be "love" to create a system where being yourself and caring about others' rights results in eternal torture? To me, this isn't a god of love; it’s a bloodthirsty egomaniac.
Has anyone else struggled with this specific "logic" trap? How do you stop your brain from seeing your autonomy as a "choice for damnation"? I’m 21, I sent my apostasy documents to the Catholic Church a while ago, and now I'm waiting to be officially excommunicated and trying to rebuild my life after this religious trauma, but the fear loops are constant.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 20 days ago
▲ 199 r/atheism

I’m sick of hearing about 'Theology of the Body' like it’s some profound spiritual insight. John Paul II had the audacity to claim that using protection or having sex before marriage is 'using' the other person, all while he was busy protecting a literal predator like Marcial Maciel. If anyone was 'using' people, it was the Church protecting their favorite monster.
They treat us like biological factories. To them, we aren't humans with desires or financial limits; we’re just a way to guarantee new baptisms. More births = more early-childhood indoctrination = more lifelong customers for their 'guilt business.' They tell you to just 'trust God will provide' while they ignore your mental health, your bank account, and your actual readiness to be a parent. Why do we listen to a bunch of celibate men in robes talk about sex? They aren't doctors, they aren't psychologists, and they aren't sexologists. They have ZERO professional authority to tell you what to do with your anatomy.
Deconstructing purity culture is easily the hardest part of leaving Catholicism. It’s not about 'sin'; it’s about unlearning the lie that your body belongs to an institution instead of yourself. It’s time we stop taking sex tips from the same people who spent decades moving predators from parish to parish.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 20 days ago

I’ve finally hit a wall with JP2’s 'Theology of the Body.' It’s the ultimate joke. This man had the audacity to claim that using protection or having sex before marriage is 'using the other person,' while he was busy covering for Marcial Maciel. Think about the level of narcissism required to tell a couple they are 'sinning' for being responsible with their health, while the 'Patron Saint of Predators' was running wild with the Pope’s blessing. It’s not about morality; it’s about inventory management.
They push the 'culture of purity' because they need the factory running. Every 'miraculous' birth is just a new recruit for their guilt-based business model. They don't care about your mental health, your empty bank account, or if you’re actually ready to be a parent. They just want you to 'trust God will provide'—which is code for 'keep producing more tithers.' Why do we listen to a group of celibate men in robes talk about sex? They aren't doctors, they aren't psychologists, and they aren't sexologists. They are influencers for a 2,000-year-old MLM. Deconstructing the purity culture is the hardest part of leaving because they didn't just teach us to fear 'sin'—they taught us to fear our own autonomy.
The Church doesn't hate 'lust.' It hates that it can't tax a condom or a choice.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 21 days ago
▲ 1.1k r/atheism

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking since I left the faith, and it’s becoming glaringly obvious: The Church’s obsession with sex isn't about 'purity' or 'divine mandates.' They don't hate premarital sex, masturbation, porn, or contraception because they think those things are inherently evil. They hate them because those things represent sexual autonomy. Think about it logically. If you have access to birth control, if you choose to be childfree or get sterilized, if you embrace your LGBTQ+ identity, or if you support abortion rights, you are making decisions that the Church can't monetize or manage. They need a constant cycle of 'shame and repent' to keep the pews full and the donations coming. Their entire 'pro-life' and 'anti-sex' stance is just a strategy to ensure a steady supply of new followers and to keep the current ones too scared and guilt-ridden to think for themselves. If they can’t control your body, they can’t control your mind. I’m done trying to 'reconcile' with a system that sees my freedom as a threat. Unless they completely scrap their obsession with policing what people do in their private lives, I have zero interest in ever looking back. I'd rather have my reality and my logic than their 'sanctified' chains.

reddit.com
u/Jorge_Reynoso112 — 25 days ago