
How thinking goes haywire
Image credit https://www.pesec.no/24-most-common-logical-fallacies/amp/).
TLDR This post is about the many logically fallacious ways humans behave and how to identify those fallacies.
A great number of ways exist in which thinking goes totally and majorly wrong. It happens all over the world and for the most part, academic degrees make little difference to this. I will just state the few most obvious ones:
Ad hominem: Targeting the messenger instead of the message. I say "This state's economy is bad" and get the reply "you are a blind moron who can't see other states and cities".
Availability heuristic: going by just our own life experience and what ideas are already available in our limited domain rather than trying to get more information. Example: "I'm poor and all those who aren't poor are the ones who make me poor and are classist".
Bandwagon Effect: just because a lot of people believe in it, this must be true. All popular superstitions fall under this category, including those that seeped in from outside - such as black cats crossing one's path and the number thirteen being unlucky.
Burden of Proof: this is not a fallacy but a statement which means that the person making the more illogical claim should furnish evidence to support that claim rather than the other party who makes a scientific counter claim. Atheists say this all the time about religious people.
Confirmation bias: The tendency to just seek confirmation for our existing views and rejecting all evidence that goes contrary to them. For example, I only consider examples of violent or rowdy people from a community that I believe is just violent terrorists.
Conformity bias: the tendency to conform to our socio-economic and educational level beliefs even if those don't agree with our logic, simply to remain in our comfort zone. Example: I am Hindu, therefore I must go to the mahakumbh despite the crowd and stampede risks.
False assertion: making false claims either deliberately or from ignorance. Example: I say "Hindutva is a political ideology just as capitalism also is" and you say "No, it's totally about being sanatani".
Occam's razor: this is the logic by which you "shave away" irrelevant facts to look at the core paradigm. It isn't a fallacy but a tool to guard against fallacies. It's the same as saying "I shall not look at the caste, region, religion and social class of my teacher, I shall only see what s/he knows of the subject".
Passive aggression: those who can't counter any compelling logic with their own logic, will show their displeasure in other ways. Silent downvoting is the perfect example.
Selection bias: Collecting data in a way that ensures we get only partial information. Example: I fish using a two inch mesh net and then conclude that the sea has no fish smaller than two inches.
Slippery slope: the tendency to blow out of proportion some events, minor or not so minor, to a fallacious doomsday conclusion. Example: I shall never travel by flights because they crash. Fact: flying is the safest mode of travel by any measure.
Stereotyping: the tendency to lump together all people in a given category without accounting for diversity and individual differences, e.g all South Indians only eat rasam sambar idli and dosa. Fact: most north Indians are clueless about the vast range of southern cuisine.
Tu quoque: or "you too" fallacy. I say "party X has historically done a lot of damage to the country" and you say "so has your BJP, they are even worse" - without even knowing if I support BJP at all or not.
There are many others but these are the main ones the left wing uses to attack us. I am listing them here for our better awareness of their tactics.