Modern Day communication Difficulties
It is the uncertainty that my message did not arrive that torments me. It is a feeling of anxious need that I must know that my message was delivered. I wonder if this is why these things are part of the tools we use to communicate nowadays. To coddle us with its extra layer of certainty that we otherwise would not be given. To have external validation that we have in fact done what we set out to do. Extra niceties that ease anxiety in the moment, but create a dependence on it over a period of time.
There are less what ifs, less potential barriers that come up, where a letter can get lost, a text is marked, send and received directly to you and the recipient. There is no room for ambiguity or interpretation. It has been done and marked as done to you both. A failure to respond now would indicate disrespect, rather than ambiguity. I wonder if these small things have slowly eroded away at our ability to tolerate uncertainty. That they have normalised a type of reassurance seeking that was once a pathology. I wonder if there is even anything we can do about it. Pandora's box has been opened so to speak. We are all accustom to it now. We cannot not as it were, "put the cat back in the bag".
It is not that it eliminates all ambiguity though. But more that it shifts the burden of tolerating that ambiguity from the sender to the receiver. They are now entirely responsible for whether or not they reply. It is an extra layer of pressure that nobody intended but is there nonetheless. I see how it has shifted our expectations. People complain others do not respond. People grow angry at the lack of willingness to engage. All which are valid.
But would these things be there if we did not have soo much certainty that our messages were even received? If connection was more spontaneous and unscripted. Would we still feel so slighted if things went off script? Would we be able to rationalise away rejection better? Instead we are given the blatant examples of it. Message Sent. Message Read. No reply. Undeniable tangible evidence of our unlovableness.
But is it really as factual as we think? Or do these new pieces of the puzzle simply remove something? Plausible deniability. The ability to save our own ego has been stolen. So every wound to it is no longer unclear how deep the cut goes. It is a clear and obvious laceration. It takes extra work for a person to add an excuse when there is evidence pointing towards the opposite. So I do not blame people for feeling this hurt by it. But I do wonder if that hurt was ever supposed to be there to begin with? Because I do not think the receiver intends to harm. But the method of communication implies malice through its portrayal.