After sales service - Appreciation post!

Hello :)

About 18 months ago, I bought a pair of JBuds Mini in Sage Gray.
I didn’t particularly like the color, but they were the cheapest option, and since I only intended to use them as a spare pair at the gym, it didn’t really matter.

However, after about a month of using them, I realized that they actually sounded great, and that the mic was more than decent for such a tiny pair of earbuds. So I ended up really liking them! :)

After about 14 months, though, the batteries in both earbuds had deteriorated quite badly. On a full charge, I was only getting about an hour of use, perhaps even less from the right earbud, the one I had been using the most.

I was disappointed, so I contacted JLab customer service. I explained the problem, and within minutes they had agreed to replace them - and they even let me choose the color!

This is great. Really excellent customer service! I’m sure other brands offer the same level of service, but I just wanted to share my experience with JLab.

So there we are - well done, JLab 😊👍
Best way to create loyalty!

reddit.com
u/No_Glove9460 — 1 day ago
▲ 11 r/JLab

After sales service - Appreciation post!

Hello :)

About 18 months ago, I bought a pair of JBuds Mini in Sage Gray.
I didn’t particularly like the color, but they were the cheapest option, and since I only intended to use them as a spare pair at the gym, it didn’t really matter.

However, after about a month of using them, I realized that they actually sounded great, and that the mic was more than decent for such a tiny pair of earbuds. So I ended up really liking them! :)

After about 14 months, though, the batteries in both earbuds had deteriorated quite badly. On a full charge, I was only getting about an hour of use, perhaps even less from the right earbud, the one I had been using the most.

I was disappointed, so I contacted JLab customer service. I explained the problem, and within minutes they had agreed to replace them - and they even let me choose the color!

This is great. Really excellent customer service! I’m sure other brands offer the same level of service, but I just wanted to share my experience with JLab.

So there we are - well done, JLab 😊👍
Best way to create loyalty!

reddit.com
u/No_Glove9460 — 2 days ago

Identification from this interior

Hello, fellow car enthusiasts! 🙂

I’m calling on your expertise to identify this car from this picture alone.

The lady is lovely, but this isn’t a joke. 😄

I’d genuinely like to know what model this is.

Many thanks in advance!

u/No_Glove9460 — 19 days ago

Lug gap, to all you maniacs out there :)

Hi all.

Lug gap is often pointed out as a major tell, especially on Rolex replicas.

I know this must have been posted before, but just as a reminder, here is a picture of a genuine 114060 that's been worn the shit out of.

Look at the lugs and bracelet fitment. You can actually see the spring bar through the lug gaps. That's how "big" they can get on a genuine Rolex.

So if you rep QC has a bit of a gap, don't focus on that. Look at dial symmetry, hands alignment and that sort of things instead.

Enjoy your rep! It's awesome (if it works).

https://preview.redd.it/rzg9z1xnh4gh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=45e52fb8c6b2e2206ca9f154d22a9dded3892ff3

reddit.com
u/No_Glove9460 — 22 days ago
▲ 98 r/Watches

[Picture angle and distance] same person and watch, but different angles

Hey everyone :)

Here are two pictures placed side by side to show how dramatically different the same watch can look on the same wrist depending on how the photo is taken.

I’m posting this because I recently saw someone share a picture of a Tissot Supersport Chrono that looked absolutely enormous on his wrist.

People laughed at him and mocked the fit, but his photo was taken more like the one on the left above.

Had he posted a picture closer to the one on the right, we would have had a much more accurate idea of how the watch actually looked on him.

That said, the Tissot is 46 mm, so it is still a large watch either way… but you get my point.

u/No_Glove9460 — 1 month ago

WD1863 water resistance

Gentlemen, I am posting this under the Quality Check tag because, well… I did perform a quality check.

I recently acquired a Bergeon pressure tester and tested all my watches.

The WD1863, rated at 10 ATM, passed the 6 ATM maximum pressure of my tester with flying colors.

That is more than enough for anything from basic swimming to light diving.

So there you go: if you were hesitating to submerge your WD1863, don’t. It passed.

PS: I tested my watch, not yours. If your case or gaskets have a defect, your watch may not be water-resistant. I simply wanted to put Watchdives’ 10 ATM rating to the test, even if only partially.

I'm also adding this interesting report from ETA, which challenges a number of common misconceptions about watch water resistance.

https://preview.redd.it/sv9l53lq717h1.png?width=769&format=png&auto=webp&s=6da34b03f023aca64a55c7160a74a0bba797e1c1

reddit.com
u/No_Glove9460 — 2 months ago

VSF 114060 caseback gasket

I am surprised by the very small amount of o rings available for sale on the web and by how unclear what watch they're for.

Can anyone point me to a VSF 114060 caseback gasket?

Edit: Reference number seems to be 29 325 10, where 32.5 x 1mm is diameter x thickness.
I'll procure one and see if that's ok.

reddit.com
u/No_Glove9460 — 3 months ago
▲ 38 r/Watches

[Regulating] Can anyone explain this ?

- Crown to the left: clean line, no noise.
- Crown to the right: noise and reading errors.

I cannot understand this, however I look at it. The movement is in the same position, after all! Flat on the case back. How is there noise if it is just rotated 180°?

Any help is much appreciated.

u/No_Glove9460 — 3 months ago
▲ 16 r/RepTime

Floating m doesn’t float so much anymore.

VSF 114060 dial, Apr. 26 version.
The m almost doesn’t float. The m is nice and aligned. Even with a powerful loupe, it is hard to see any floating happening here.

I drew a white line to illustrate this fact.

And I know some people will say this post proves the exact opposite, but guys, this is highly zoomed in. Such a tiny difference at this level of magnification clearly shows that under a loupe — and even more so to the naked eye — the “m” is almost perfectly aligned.

u/No_Glove9460 — 3 months ago