




Circular-type Saws: which factors matter more? RPM? Amps?
I’ve had a Ryobi mitre saw forever (probably 25 years) that I bought for my first home renovation and now I’m on my second, full gut down to the studs and now I’m approaching the “time to do molding etc” where I’ll need to mitre a lot.
Saw a deal on an old Makita that came with an attached rolling platform (Ridgid brand) that’s better than squatting on the floor with my old Ryobi. It also had a sliding rail so I could do bigger cuts and extensions to support long pieces etc. it was like $80-$100 so I figured it was worth it for my knees and back. It’s heavy AF, but once it’s set up I think it will be better.
I’m mostly on XGT and would LOVE to get that 8 1/2” model everyone talks about but for the REALLY expensive tools where I can’t find a deal and generally are stationary anyway, I don’t mind “tails”. Or rather just can’t justify when I know I won’t be using them as much beyond the remodel timeframe.
When I got home I noticed that if I’m just comparing specs the Ryobi is better (With the exception of no sliding rail)?
The Makita is also missing the plastic slit piece that gets cut up while chopping. I’m hoping to figure out which part it is and replace it anyway.
Question is basically is the Ryobi better because it’s a higher RPM? Both 10” saws, Ryobi seems to have all the basic movements. Can’t see in the pics but it tilts sideways too in one direction at least. I’ve never had an issue with an angle I couldn’t figure out how to cut. I’m sure the Makita has some extra angles or easier ones somehow, but in terms of the motor my understanding is faster is better for clean cuts so the Ryobi looks to be superior for clean trim? Are the specs a lie and the Makita engine will hold up better under heavier load somehow?
Please educate me. Models and “specs” pics at the end of the photo gallery.