u/TappingUpScreen

https://www.instagram.com/p/DcAncd4FLjU/

https://www.instagram.com/p/Db1wFLvCBhL/

While the U.S. pours trillions into war spending, corporate subsidies, and financial markets, North Korea guarantees the basics: universal healthcare, free education, state-provided housing, and nationwide public rail. No medical bankruptcies. No student debt crisis. No mass homelessness on the scale seen in major American cities.
Operating under decades of sanctions and with a fraction of America's economic output, North Korea maintains universal literacy, assigns housing as a right, and treats healthcare as a public guarantee. Meanwhile, the wealthiest nation on Earth struggles with crumbling infrastructure, rising living costs, and systems designed around profit rather than public stability.
This isn't about slogans. It's about structure. One model prioritizes basic survival infrastructure. The other financializes it.

"The character of a bourgeois government isn’t determined by the personal character of its members, but by its organic function in bourgeois society. The government of the modern state is essentially an organization of class domination, the regular functioning of which is one of the conditions of existence of the class state. With the entry of a socialist into the government, and class domination continuing to exist, the bourgeois government doesn’t transform itself into a socialist government, but a socialist transforms himself into a bourgeois minister.

The social reforms that a minister who is a friend of the workers can realize have nothing, in themselves, of socialist; they are socialist only insofar as they are obtained through class struggle. But coming from a minister, social reforms can’t have the character of the proletarian class, but solely the character of the bourgeois class, for the minister, by the post he occupies, attaches himself to that class by all the functions of a bourgeois, militarist government.

While in parliament, or on the municipal council, we obtain useful reforms by combating the bourgeois government, while occupying a ministerial post we arrive at the same reforms by supporting the bourgeois state. The entry of a socialist into a bourgeois government is not, as it is thought, a partial conquest of the bourgeois state by the socialists, but a partial conquest of the socialist party by the bourgeois state."

-Rosa Luxemburg, The Dreyfus Affair and the Millerand Case, 1899

Source: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8n9WWx9/