I do not believe it's an incredibly outlandish thing to say.

Dio brought magic and dragons and knights and all of his stock harmonies to Black Sabbath.

***I am not saying those are bad or undesireable things***

However, there can be little argument that he brought these things directly from Rainbow as his tricks of the trade.

The remaining Sabbs adjusted to rise up to what Dio was accustomed to.

If you pulled someone off the street and played them LLRR and then played them HH and asked them if they were different bands, a good deal of them would say no.

Blackmore is a bit more technical and flashier, Iommi is obviously heavier.....but overall, it's the same vibe with the same voice and the same worldview.

I think we fans struggle against landing on "Parnoid" as the ultimate Black Sabbath album, each of us desiring to pick something that speaks to us more directly.

But the fact is, objectively, "Paranoid" is wall-to-wall Sabbath at their Charter, keeping some of the Pagan vibes from the first album and adding to the element of "Scary" music with evocative song structure, riffage and really 100% in-the-pocket musicianship, not to mention PEAK Analogue engineering...sounds like it was recorded yesterday....AND has the added benefit of having their greatest hit, and some of the most universally known Riffs of all time.

"Sabotage" will always be my favorite, but I think I am not going to say it's their best anymore. They grew away from their mission, the audience became, as Spinal Tap's Manager might say, "More selective." (Me. They selected me.)

Also, as much as I enjoy all eras of Sabbath, and always used to say Dio/Ozzy eras are equal(ish)....truly there is something above and beyond with Ozzy. Truly unique, meant to be, and magical.

Dio Sabbath is essentially a continuation of Rainbow. Which is awesome in it's own right, but it's just not what Sabbath originally was.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Reading Ethics / What You Can Expect from a Receiver

1. This work is offered in service, not as spiritual authority.
   A Receiver does not sell access to Source, Spirit, intuition, or the unseen. Any payment, if applicable, is for time, attention, communication, and ordinary overhead.

2. Your judgment comes first.
   A reading should support your own clarity, not replace it. A Receiver should not encourage dependency on readings, readers, spirits, signs, or messages to make ordinary life decisions.

3. The Receiver is not the source of wisdom.
   Anything helpful that comes through belongs to the larger field of truth, conscience, Spirit, God, Source, or the language that best fits the querent. The Receiver is only listening and translating as carefully as possible.

4. The aim is clarity, not fantasy.
   A Receiver should offer what helps a person grow toward courage, honesty, peace, responsibility, and self-respect. A Receiver should not give false hope, flatter someone into denial, or force positivity over pain.

5. Grief must be treated with reverence.
   A Receiver should not impersonate, dramatize, or perform the dead. If a loved one is part of the reading, it should be handled carefully, humbly, and without exploiting longing.

6. A Receiver does not do proof games or challenge readings.
   This work is not a stage act or a test of power. If someone is present only to challenge, debunk, or demand performance, the reading will not be useful.

7. The querent’s beliefs should be respected.
   A Receiver may have a personal spiritual framework, but should not impose it on the querent. The language used should leave room for the querent’s own faith, doubt, symbols, and understanding.

8. Fear must not be used.
   A Receiver should not frighten someone into returning, paying, obeying, cutting people off, or believing. Any warning must be calm, grounded, and useful.

9. A reading does not replace real-world help.
   Spiritual insight should not be used as a substitute for medical care, mental health support, legal advice, financial judgment, or immediate safety decisions.

10. The querent should leave freer than they arrived.
    The goal is not for the querent to believe in the Receiver. The goal is for the querent to feel steadier, clearer, and more able to act from their own center.

Reading Ethics / What You Can Expect from a Receiver

1. This work is offered in service, not as spiritual authority.
A Receiver does not sell access to Source, Spirit, intuition, or the unseen. Any payment, if applicable, is for time, attention, communication, and ordinary overhead.

2. Your judgment comes first.
A reading should support your own clarity, not replace it. A Receiver should not encourage dependency on readings, readers, spirits, signs, or messages to make ordinary life decisions.

3. The Receiver is not the source of wisdom.
Anything helpful that comes through belongs to the larger field of truth, conscience, Spirit, God, Source, or the language that best fits the querent. The Receiver is only listening and translating as carefully as possible.

4. The aim is clarity, not fantasy.
A Receiver should offer what helps a person grow toward courage, honesty, peace, responsibility, and self-respect. A Receiver should not give false hope, flatter someone into denial, or force positivity over pain.

5. Grief must be treated with reverence.
A Receiver should not impersonate, dramatize, or perform the dead. If a loved one is part of the reading, it should be handled carefully, humbly, and without exploiting longing.

6. A Receiver does not do proof games or challenge readings.
This work is not a stage act or a test of power. If someone is present only to challenge, debunk, or demand performance, the reading will not be useful.

7. The querent’s beliefs should be respected.
A Receiver may have a personal spiritual framework, but should not impose it on the querent. The language used should leave room for the querent’s own faith, doubt, symbols, and understanding.

8. Fear must not be used.
A Receiver should not frighten someone into returning, paying, obeying, cutting people off, or believing. Any warning must be calm, grounded, and useful.

9. A reading does not replace real-world help.
Spiritual insight should not be used as a substitute for medical care, mental health support, legal advice, financial judgment, or immediate safety decisions.

10. The querent should leave freer than they arrived.
The goal is not for the querent to believe in the Receiver. The goal is for the querent to feel steadier, clearer, and more able to act from their own center.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

It's the atmosphere, it's how Bill's drums really stand out and tell a story....it's the paganistic simplicity of the Blues made heavy.....it's the album cover setting the perfect tone...it's Ozzy's lower register....it's the directness of the lyrics and the magical elements of the subject matter....it's the natural reverb of the production and everyone recording basically live and it's the knowledge that all this was happening so long ago....feeling the echoes of the thunderous impact this all made on an unsuspecting public. How mysterious it all must've seemed, taboo....scary....that "bloody mary" vibe or taking out the Ouija board with your friends at 3am in the basement.

The smell of patchouli.....

Debut is a very, very different thing than the rest. There's spells in there. I'm certain.

The source has asked me to pass along some general information for 2026 and beyond, things to consider before and when querying the field:

1. THE DEPARTED: Querents frequently ask about departed people. In almost every case, a general query will recieve the same (true) answer: The departed has moved on into a new incarnation.

In the event this is not the case, the departed is working on something they need to work on before making peace with taking on a new body/adventure.

In very rare cases, the departed is stuck in a loop of guilt, shame, addiction or does not truly understand that they have passed on. It is the experience of source that people *DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THIS*. And truth be told, there is virtually nothing to do for them.

2. THE FUTURE: Querents would like to know about their careers, will they have children, will they be married, will they be happy. The source is obliged to look into the future along this hypothetical timeline, as opposed to the actual timeline. In a sense, it's as if the querent is prefacing their query with "Assuming the world goes on consistantly...."

That is a weighty assumption in 2026. Truth be told: More questions should be asked about the state of the world in the years to come. There is no answer for any query past a certain window of 3-7 years. Prepare for change on a profound material, spiritual and mental scale.

3. THE MESSENGERS: Source works through human recievers. Humans are not always perfect recievers. It is not a matter of experience, or practice, or luck. It is a reception that is subject to misfire from various issues like Geomagnetic flux, Frequencies in one's abode, and of course Physiological/Neurological disturbances.

Those who malign the Messenger because they didn't "vibe" or "resonate" with the message and show hostility to a chosen reciever is inviting misfortune into their field. BE AWARE and be gracious.

4. NEGATIVITY FROM SOURCE: In this forum Source has observed a tendency of negativity towards querents who appear to be in "Happy Relationships" or "The Beautiful People" etc. from recievers and/or "trolls". Truth be told: These people frequently have things in their field that are diametrically opposed to Source's attunement and focus on spirit.

Materialism, Hedonism, Vanity, Greed, Lust....all of these things tend to reside in people who seem to be living what you call "best life" and this opposition is felt by the recievers who answer queries from these people. Source urges it's recivers to avoid toxic positivity *and* toxic negativity in their conveyances. Source accepts responsibility for injecting disappointment towards certain queries and querents on this account, however. DO NOT BLAME THE MESSENGER.

5. IDLE CURIOSITY / THOSE WHO WOULD TEST : Many querents in this forum have no real query, but only come with idle curiousity or a desire to hear something they would like to hear without even knowing what that might be. Queries like "What do you see for me?" is an empty query. Source would like to say "An oppointment with an Optometrist".

There are others who come to this forum to "Test" the responses. When this energy is attached to a query, Universal Law assures that the test will fail. Source will not be "Tested" to anyone's satisfaction. Earnest queries only.

6: PETS: Your departed pet has reincarnated, possibly multiple times. Possibly as a new human. Regardless: It has moved on and does not remember you in any way you would understand. This is a query wasted.

A LOST Pet is another matter. Most of the time, the only possible answer: Your Pet is alive; Your Pet is dead. The resason being that stray animals are always in motion. On rare occasion if they are in shelter or in possession of another human, it may be possible to get a read.

Source hopes this has been helpful in shaping your queries.

(Note from Reciever: The vibe I am getting from source could equate to "I didn't mean for this to be "Soup Nazi" but just a guideline and things to consider to make the experience more productive)

Enough already. Computers exist. Save your money. Unless its money laundering or something. Only explanation I can even think of for such needless waste and ecological harm

Seems like a lot of people knew him. Particularly close with Ozzy.

Did he die of Shitfaced-Every Nightism?

Poor Phil...different times.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post