Netflix Matt Murdock vs Disney Plus Matt Murdock
Scenario: Peter Parker is in legal trouble. He asks Matt Murdock to represent him. Matt knows Peter is Spiderman. Peter is convicted for stealing some classified docs, which he took as Spiderman to find Doc Ock. He was caught with the docs when he came to return it
Netflix Matt: Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. What is the idea of stealing? It involves taking sth without permission for some self-serving purpose. There is no concept of conspiracies or theories involved in stealing. The only meaningful questions are about the stealing agent, the stolen object and a clear self serving purpose. These questions, and only these questions, determine the severity of the consequences for the theft. Anything else is beyond the purview of objectivity. And so, based on these questions alone, the prosecution has put forward that Mr. Parker was the agent and the classified docs are the object. And this is not contested that Mr. Parker has the docs in his possession. But they have failed to prove what could be the self serving purpose for Mr. Parker to steal these files. And since we are pondering about questions, this gap raises another question about how Mr. Parker got this docs. As proven by the defendants already, Mr. Parker found these documents on the streets and he assumed it as his civic duty to return these files to the Police Station. And so objectively based on these questions, and these questions alone, my client should be acquitted.
Disney Plus Matt: Mr. Parker. ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT THE VIGILANTE CALLED SPIDERMAN? You are under the oath. Ladies and Gentlemen, by his own testimony, Mr. Parker is Spiderman and he took those documents to hunt Doc Ock from going on another crime spree. Hence he should be acquitted.