What does it take to be mod here?
Just wondering.

My chats dont work, thus why i am asking here
They should be fixed by tomorrow if i consider past Reddit experience

I've seen a lot of people treat Cyn and N as confirmed siblings because of the "big brother" line.

The reasoning usually goes:

Cyn calls N "big brother" → they are siblings

The issue is that the second step is not actually confirmed.

Before anything else: yes, drones can have family relationships. We know that.

Uzi calls Khan "dad" and refers to Nori as "mom," and Doll refers to Yeva and another drone as "mom" and "dad."

So the argument is not that drones don't have families.

The question is specifically:

Are Cyn and N confirmed to be siblings?

And currently, we have no confirmation of that.

1. "Big brother" does not automatically prove literal siblinghood

Cyn calling N "big brother" shows that she sees him in a brother-like role.

However, a brother-like role does not automatically mean they share the same origin.

Fiction often uses family terms to describe relationships, dynamics, or emotional bonds rather than literal ancestry.

Also, N does not respond by calling Cyn "little sister" or using any equivalent sibling term.

He calls her "little buddy," which is a more general affectionate term and does not explicitly confirm a sibling relationship.

The term alone is not enough to prove that Cyn and N are code siblings.

2. Drone families exist, but that does not prove Cyn and N are related

The show does establish that drones can have family structures.

Uzi calls Khan "dad" and refers to Nori as "mom."

Doll refers to Yeva and another drone as "mom" and "dad."

So yes, drones can have parents and family relationships.

However, the existence of drone families does not prove that Cyn and N specifically belong to one.

3. The drone creation system does not prove Cyn and N share ancestry

The creators have confirmed that drones are created through a process where two drones contribute 50% of their code data into a machine, which creates a new drone.

This means drones can have parent-like origins.

However, this only proves that siblings are possible.

It does not prove Cyn and N were created from the same drones.

4. There is no confirmed shared code origin between Cyn and N

We have no confirmed information that Cyn and N share one or both code contributors.

Without that connection, their sibling status is an interpretation rather than confirmed information.

5. Cyn and N's origins make a shared parent connection unlikely

Cyn was found inside a massive pile of discarded drones in the scrapyard near the manor.

Tessa took drones from the scrapyard, repaired them, and brought them into the manor.

N was also among the drones connected to the manor.

Considering the size of the scrapyard, or even only the pile Cyn was in, the chance that Tessa happened to bring in two drones that shared even one common code contributor seems extremely low.

6. The human-era context makes this even less likely

Cyn and N existed during the time when humans were still around.

Humans treated drones as property and were shown to be extremely strict and hostile toward them.

We even see James destroy a drone casually.

Because of this environment, drone relationships and independent creation would likely have been difficult or dangerous.

7. Cyn's condition and situation add more context

Cyn is not a normal drone by the time we see most of her actions.

She is affected by the Absolute Solver and is corrupted, controlled, and altered by it.

Her behavior is extremely manipulative, violent (especially during the gala), and disconnected from normal relationships.

This does not prove that Cyn and N are not siblings.

However, it adds context that their interactions cannot simply be reduced to a normal sibling relationship.

8. Family terms can describe social relationships

Even when family terms are used, they do not always explain the exact origin of a relationship.

A character can call someone "brother," "sister," "mom," or "dad" because of emotional attachment, upbringing, or the role that person fills.

The existence of the term does not automatically prove the exact biological/code relationship behind it.

9. The "cyncest" argument requires two assumptions

Calling something "cyncest"/incest between Cyn and N (because of course I have to talk about it) requires two things to be true:

1. Cyn and N are siblings.
2. The artwork is romantic/sexual.

If either assumption is wrong, the label does not apply.

The first point is not confirmed by canon.

The second point also cannot be assumed from the mere presence of both characters.

10. Not every Cyn and N artwork is a ship artwork

An artwork containing only Cyn and N does not automatically mean it is depicting a romantic or sexual relationship.

Artists can draw characters together for many reasons:

• exploring their history,
• showing their canon dynamic,
• making character-focused art,
• depicting a non-romantic relationship,
• or simply because they like both characters.

The intent of an artwork cannot be determined only from which characters appear in it.

11. The sibling interpretation is not confirmed canon

The point is not that Cyn and N definitely cannot be siblings.

The point is that neither canon nor Glitch/Liam have confirmed that they are.

Their relationship can be interpreted as "siblings-LIKE," but treating that as confirmed code-based siblinghood requires assumptions that have not been directly established.

Conclusion

Cyn and N having a brother-like dynamic is canon.

Cyn and N being confirmed code siblings is not.

The difference between those two things is where the debate comes from.

I am only discussing the "siblings" part of the relationship here.

I am not addressing the separate topics of the relationship being abusive, problematic, or extreme, as those are different discussions.

If I missed any arguments or points, feel free to respectfully point them out.

I am also open to hearing respectful arguments for why Cyn and N could be siblings, as long as they are based on actual evidence or reasoning and are not rude.

I've seen a lot of people treat Cyn and N as confirmed siblings because of the "big brother" line.

The reasoning usually goes:

Cyn calls N "big brother" → they are siblings

The issue is that the second step is not actually confirmed.

Before anything else: yes, drones can have family relationships. We know that.

Uzi calls Khan "dad" and refers to Nori as "mom," and Doll refers to Yeva and another drone as "mom" and "dad."

So the argument is not that drones don't have families.

The question is specifically:

Are Cyn and N confirmed to be siblings?

And currently, we have no confirmation of that.

1. "Big brother" does not automatically prove literal siblinghood

Cyn calling N "big brother" shows that she sees him in a brother-like role.

However, a brother-like role does not automatically mean they share the same origin.

Fiction often uses family terms to describe relationships, dynamics, or emotional bonds rather than literal ancestry.

Also, N does not respond by calling Cyn "little sister" or using any equivalent sibling term.

He calls her "little buddy," which is a more general affectionate term and does not explicitly confirm a sibling relationship.

The term alone is not enough to prove that Cyn and N are code siblings.

2. Drone families exist, but that does not prove Cyn and N are related

The show does establish that drones can have family structures.

Uzi calls Khan "dad" and refers to Nori as "mom."

Doll refers to Yeva and another drone as "mom" and "dad."

So yes, drones can have parents and family relationships.

However, the existence of drone families does not prove that Cyn and N specifically belong to one.

3. The drone creation system does not prove Cyn and N share ancestry

The creators have confirmed that drones are created through a process where two drones contribute 50% of their code data into a machine, which creates a new drone.

This means drones can have parent-like origins.

However, this only proves that siblings are possible.

It does not prove Cyn and N were created from the same drones.

4. There is no confirmed shared code origin between Cyn and N

We have no confirmed information that Cyn and N share one or both code contributors.

Without that connection, their sibling status is an interpretation rather than confirmed information.

5. Cyn and N's origins make a shared parent connection unlikely

Cyn was found inside a massive pile of discarded drones in the scrapyard near the manor.

Tessa took drones from the scrapyard, repaired them, and brought them into the manor.

N was also among the drones connected to the manor.

Considering the size of the scrapyard, or even only the pile Cyn was in, the chance that Tessa happened to bring in two drones that shared even one common code contributor seems extremely low.

6. The human-era context makes this even less likely

Cyn and N existed during the time when humans were still around.

Humans treated drones as property and were shown to be extremely strict and hostile toward them.

We even see James destroy a drone casually.

Because of this environment, drone relationships and independent creation would likely have been difficult or dangerous.

7. Cyn's condition and situation add more context

Cyn is not a normal drone by the time we see most of her actions.

She is affected by the Absolute Solver and is corrupted, controlled, and altered by it.

Her behavior is extremely manipulative, violent (especially during the gala), and disconnected from normal relationships.

This does not prove that Cyn and N are not siblings.

However, it adds context that their interactions cannot simply be reduced to a normal sibling relationship.

8. Family terms can describe social relationships

Even when family terms are used, they do not always explain the exact origin of a relationship.

A character can call someone "brother," "sister," "mom," or "dad" because of emotional attachment, upbringing, or the role that person fills.

The existence of the term does not automatically prove the exact biological/code relationship behind it.

9. The "cyncest" argument requires two assumptions

Calling something "cyncest"/incest between Cyn and N (because of course I have to talk about it) requires two things to be true:

1. Cyn and N are siblings.
2. The artwork is romantic/sexual.

If either assumption is wrong, the label does not apply.

The first point is not confirmed by canon.

The second point also cannot be assumed from the mere presence of both characters.

10. Not every Cyn and N artwork is a ship artwork

An artwork containing only Cyn and N does not automatically mean it is depicting a romantic or sexual relationship.

Artists can draw characters together for many reasons:

• exploring their history,
• showing their canon dynamic,
• making character-focused art,
• depicting a non-romantic relationship,
• or simply because they like both characters.

The intent of an artwork cannot be determined only from which characters appear in it.

11. The sibling interpretation is not confirmed canon

The point is not that Cyn and N definitely cannot be siblings.

The point is that neither canon nor Glitch/Liam have confirmed that they are.

Their relationship can be interpreted as "siblings-LIKE," but treating that as confirmed code-based siblinghood requires assumptions that have not been directly established.

Conclusion

Cyn and N having a brother-like dynamic is canon.

Cyn and N being confirmed code siblings is not.

The difference between those two things is where the debate comes from.

I am only discussing the "siblings" part of the relationship here.

I am not addressing the separate topics of the relationship being abusive, problematic, or extreme, as those are different discussions.

If I missed any arguments or points, feel free to respectfully point them out.

I am also open to hearing respectful arguments for why Cyn and N could be siblings, as long as they are based on actual evidence or reasoning and are not rude.

I've been looking for an artist to make my MD OC for free for a long time now.
Not that i'm selfish or anything, just that my online paying accounts got hacked,so i had them locked, so normally until atleast february i cant pay anything
Anyone up for it?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

user name is

https://preview.redd.it/ue7rq5duc61h1.png?width=279&format=png&auto=webp&s=606f89228895087feb1d9a8358efd40d6c16a0d0

I would need a flight command on a private server, tho idk what to put in, or how to instal one