Login

u/HYDRURBERG

r/BikeRepair r/Muslim r/RoadBikes r/redditrequest r/MuslimLounge r/bikewrench r/MuslimIndians r/SalafiCentral r/extomatoes r/SriLankanMuslim r/PanIslamistPosting
Secular regime and it's selective law & order
▲ 4 r/MuslimIndians

Secular regime and it's selective law & order

I feel like a great criminal today. Shah Amanat Sabir is a young man from Khulna. I don't remember exactly when I met him. However, he used to visit various Islamic programs at the madrasa (Islamic school) I established in Jashore. He is an excellent martial arts expert. But he was troubled by various anti-Islamic elements in traditional martial arts (such as free-mixing of men and women, bowing of the head, forbidden music, etc.). Because of this, he started a new style of martial arts on his own, which he named Fatah Combat System. He had been conducting all his activities publicly in compliance with the rules of the state. To the best of my knowledge, he did not violate any law of the land. Despite this, when he became a victim of propaganda by Indian media due to his Islamic attire and appearance, he cleared up everything through a press conference. (Link in the comments).

According to the statement of their press conference, this new style of martial arts has a total of five branches in Khulna, Jashore, and Chandpur. He requested my cooperation over a phone call regarding opening a new branch in Dhaka. Being busy with multifaceted work, I expressed my inability to assist him directly. Later, I learned through a Facebook post that he had already launched a branch in Dhaka. However, due to police obstruction at Ramna Park, they could not conduct training there and instead started martial arts training in the Mini Cox's Bazar area.

This morning, he called me and informed me that two of his new students had been arrested and taken to Jatrabari Police Station. He gave me the phone number of the investigating officer at Jatrabari Police Station, and I called him. The investigating officer stated, "They were brought in for questioning because some confusion arose regarding them. But since they are new students, they don't know much about the institution. Once the confusion is cleared, the administration will release them."

After receiving such assurance from the administration, I told Sabir, "Your new students might not know about your institution well. Therefore, you should personally go to the police station and clear their confusion." Following my advice, Sabir went to the police station along with three others to clear the administration's confusion and get his students released. But unfortunately, the administration showed all 6 of them arrested under Section 54 and took them on a three-day remand.

My question is, if the administration wanted, they could have arrested Sabir right from Ramna. Instead of doing that, why did they use me in the middle to arrest him? Furthermore, since he was conducting all his activities publicly, if he had done anything illegal, they could have filed a case under a specific section of the law. But when he went to free his students, arresting them under Section 54—which is a British black law—is highly suspicious. Moreover, this will set a terrible precedent. Perhaps in the future, if someone falls into danger, no one will want to visit a police station to check on the endangered person out of fear of becoming a victim themselves.

In conclusion, my point is that arresting them under Section 54 means the administration found no specific crime committed by them. They have been taken on remand for interrogation just to clear the administration's confusion about them. Therefore, we expect from the administration that just as we advised them to go to the police station to cooperate with the law enforcement, the administration will also show a sense of responsibility as per their promise and release them immediately without any harassment. And if it is proven through interrogation that they have violated any such law of the state for which they need to be brought to justice, then let that be clearly disclosed to the nation. I hope the administration will not create an opportunity for instability in the country by staging a new 'militant drama' while keeping the nation in the dark.

What more can I say about the media! The way they made headlines along with the pictures of these boys, even if they are proven innocent and released, won't they have to carry the trauma of this media persecution for the rest of their lives?

Postscript (P.S.): Since four more people got detained by going to the police station to free two others based on my advice, I feel like a criminal myself. May Allah forgive me (Allahummagh firli).

-Ataur Rahman Bikrampuri Hafizahullah (حَفِظَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ)

u/HYDRURBERG — 4 hours ago
▲ 5 r/MuslimIndians

Verbal Nullifiers of the Kalimah of Tawhid يلوقلا ديحوتلا ملك ضقاون

Verbal Nullifiers of the Kalimah of Tawhid

There are several verbal nullifiers of the Kalimah of Tawhid. Some such nullifiers, which have no connection to the heart or physical limbs, are mentioned below:

(a) Insulting Allah, His Messenger, and His Deen (Religion)

Allah Ta'ala has said:

﴿ يَحْذَرُ الْمُنَافِقُونَ أَنْ تُنَزَّلَ عَلَيْهِمْ سُورَةٌ تُنَبِّئُهُمْ بِمَا فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ قُلِ اسْتَهْزِئُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ مُخْرِجٌ مَا تَحْذَرُونَ . وَلَئِنْ سَأَلْتَهُمْ لَيَقُولُنَّ إِنَّمَا كُنَّا نَخُوضُ وَنَلْعَبُ قُلْ أَبِاللَّهِ وَآيَاتِهِ وَرَسُولِهِ كُنْتُمْ تَسْتَهْزِئُونَ . لَا تَعْتَذِرُوا قَدْ كَفَرْتُمْ بَعْدَ إِيمَانِكُمْ إِنْ نَعْفُ عَنْ طَائِفَةٍ مِنْكُمْ نُعَذِّبْ طَائِفَةً بِأَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا مُجْرِمِينَ ﴾

Meaning: "The hypocrites fear lest a Surah should be revealed about them, exposing what is in their hearts. Say (O Prophet!), 'Mock as you wish; surely Allah will expose what you fear.' If you ask them, they will surely say, 'We were only conversing and playing.' Say (O Prophet!), 'Was it Allah, His signs, and His Messenger that you were mocking? Make no excuse. You have disbelieved after your belief. If We pardon a party of you, We will punish another party because they were criminals." (Surah At-Tawbah, Ayah 64-66)

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rahimahullah) said, "This verse is clear that mocking and ridiculing the verses of Allah and His Messenger constitutes disbelief (kufr). Therefore, the matter of insulting them goes without saying (i.e., it is definitely disbelief)." (As-Sarim al-Maslul, 31)

He further stated, "If anyone insults Allah or the Messenger (Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam), he becomes a disbeliever (kafir) both inwardly and outwardly, whether the abuser considers it forbidden (haram), permissible (halal), or holds no particular belief regarding it. This is the school of thought (madhhab) of the jurists (fuqaha) and Ahlus Sunnah, who are the proponents of the maxim 'Iman is the name of both speech and action'." Ishaq ibn Rahwayh (Rahimahullah) said, "There is a consensus (ijma) among Muslims that whoever insults Allah or His Messenger (Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam) becomes a disbeliever, even if he accepts what Allah has revealed."

Qadi Abu Ya'la states in the book titled "Al-Mu'tamad" that whoever insults Allah or His Messenger (Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam) becomes a disbeliever, whether he considers the act of insulting permissible or forbidden. (As-Sarim al-Maslul 512-513)

(b) Invoking others besides Allah and seeking help from others besides Allah in matters where none but Allah is capable

Allah Ta'ala has said,

﴿ وَلَا تَدْعُ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ مَا لَا يَنْفَعُكَ وَلَا يَضُرُّكَ فَإِنْ فَعَلْتَ فَإِنَّكَ إِذًا مِنَ الظَّالِمِينَ . وَإِنْ يَمْسَسْكَ اللَّهُ بِضُرٍّ فَلَا كَاشِفَ لَهُ إِلَّا هُوَ وَإِنْ يُرِدْكَ بِخَيْرٍ فَلَا رَادَّ لِفَضْلِهِ يُصِيبُ بِهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ وَهُوَ الْغَفُورُ الرَّحِيمُ ﴾

Meaning: "And do not invoke besides Allah that which neither benefits you nor harms you, for if you do, then you would indeed be of the wrongdoers (polytheists)." "And if Allah should touch you with adversity, there is no remover of it except Him; and if He intends for you good, then there is no repeller of His bounty. He causes it to reach whom He wills of His servants. And He is the Forgiving, the Merciful." (Surah Yunus, Ayah 106-107)

Qadi Shawkani (Rahimahullah) said, "Tawhid cannot be pure until all supplications (du'a) are directed solely to Allah. Invoking, seeking help, hope, aspiration, seeking good, and seeking the removal of harm, etc., are all for Allah and come only from Allah. They are not for anyone else, nor do they come from anyone else."

Allah Ta'ala says,

﴿ فَلَا تَدْعُوا مَعَ اللَّهِ أَحَدًا ﴾

Meaning: "So do not invoke anyone along with Allah." (Surah Al-Jinn, Ayah 18)

Elsewhere He says,

﴿ لَهُ دَعْوَةُ الْحَقِّ وَالَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ مِنْ دُونِهِ لَا يَسْتَجِيبُونَ لَهُمْ بِشَيْءٍ ﴾

Meaning: "The call of truth (Dawatul Haq) is for Allah alone. And those whom they invoke besides Him do not respond to their call at all." (Surah Ar-Ra'd, Ayah 14)

(c) Claiming Prophethood

Allah Ta'ala says,

﴿ وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ افْتَرَىٰ عَلَى اللَّهِ كَذِبًا أَوْ قَالَ أُوحِيَ إِلَيَّ وَلَمْ يُوحَ إِلَيْهِ شَيْءٌ وَمَنْ قَالَ سَأُنْزِلُ مِثْلَ مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ ۗ وَلَوْ تَرَىٰ إِذِ الظَّالِمُونَ فِي غَمَرَاتِ الْمَوْتِ وَالْمَلَائِكَةُ بَاسِطُو أَيْدِيهِمْ أَخْرِجُوا أَنْفُسَكُمُ ۖ الْيَوْمَ تُجْزَوْنَ عَذَابَ الْهُونِ بِمَا كُنْتُمْ تَقُولُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ غَيْرَ الْحَقِّ وَكُنْتُمْ عَنْ آيَاتِهِ تَسْتَكْبِرُونَ ﴾

Meaning: "And who is more unjust than one who invents a lie against Allah or says, 'Revelation has come to me,' while nothing has been revealed to him, and one who says, 'I will reveal the like of what Allah has revealed'?

And if you could but see when the wrongdoers are in the overwhelming pangs of death while the angels extend their hands, saying, 'Deliver up your souls! Today you will be awarded the punishment of [extreme] humiliation for what you used to say against Allah other than the truth and that you were arrogant toward His verses.'" (Surah Al-An'am, Ayah 93)

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rahimahullah) said, "The person who falsely claims prophethood is the most severe disbeliever (kafir), the greatest wrongdoer (zalim), and the vilest person among all of Allah's creation." Allah Ta'ala says,

﴿ فَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ افْتَرَىٰ عَلَى اللَّهِ كَذِبًا لِيُضِلَّ النَّاسَ بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الظَّالِمِينَ ﴾

Meaning: "Then who is more unjust than one who invents a lie against Allah to mislead the people without knowledge? Indeed, Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." (Surah Al-An'am, Ayah 144. Al-Jawab us-Sahih liman baddala Din al-Masih, Vol. 1, p. 30)

Allama Ibn Hazm al-Zahiri (Rahimahullah) said, "Whoever claims prophethood for anyone after the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam)—with the exception of Isa ibn Maryam (Alaihis Salam), who was already a prophet before and will appear on Earth in the end times to perform Jihad for establishing the Deen of Islam as a member of the Last Prophet's Ummah—is a disbeliever (kafir). There is no disagreement among Muslims regarding this matter. Because this contradicts the definitive guidance proven from the Qur'an and the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam)." (Al-Fasl, Vol. 3, p. 293)

(d) Believing any undeniable/indisputable ruling of the Deen to be a lie

Allah Ta'ala says,

﴿ وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ افْتَرَىٰ عَلَى اللَّهِ كَذِبًا أَوْ كَذَّبَ بِآيَاتِهِ ۗ إِنَّهُ لَا يُفْلِحُ الظَّالِمُونَ ﴾

Meaning: "And who is more unjust than one who invents a lie against Allah or denies His verses? Indeed, the wrongdoers will not succeed." (Surah Al-An'am, Verse 21)

Abil Izz Hanafi (Rah.) said, "There is no disagreement among Muslims that, 'If any person denies any mutawatir (consecutively narrated), definitive, and clear wajib (obligatory), haram (prohibited), or any similar ruling of the Deen (religion), then he will be asked to repent. Therefore, if he repents, it is well and good; otherwise, he will be executed as a Kafir Murtad (disbelieving apostate).'" (Sharh al-Aqeedah at-Tahawiyyah, 355). Mullah Ali Qari (Rah.) has also said the same thing. (Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar, 108)

Qadi Iyad (Rah.) said, "Similarly, regarding those who deny and falsify any fundamental principle of the Shariah, or any action proven through tawatur (continuous transmission) from the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam), a continuous consensus (Ijma) of the Ummah has been established concerning their disbelief (kufr). For example, if a person denies the 5 daily prayers (salat), zakat, or the number of prostrations (sajdah)." (Al-Shifa, Vol. 2, Page 1073)

Imam Ibn Hazm (Rah.) said, "The person who, out of denial and falsification, leaves any fard (mandatory duty) ordained by Allah or any emphasized sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam), is a clear disbeliever (kafir). No wise person who believes in Allah and the Last Day can harbor the slightest doubt or hesitation regarding his disbelief." (Al-Isal, Vol. 2, Page 264)

Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rah.) said, "To have faith in the obligation of a clearly proven wajib ruling being mandatory, and a haram ruling being prohibited, is the greatest fundamental principle of Iman (faith) and the greatest foundation of the Deen. Anyone who denies this is a disbeliever (kafir) by unanimous consensus." (Majmu'al-Fatawa, Vol. 12, Page 497)

Imam Nawawi (Rah.) said, "Anyone who denies a consensus-based ruling of the Ummah that is based on texts (Quran and Sunnah)—and the ruling is regarding a matter of Islam that is commonly known by both ordinary and specific people alike, such as prayer (namaz), zakat, hajj, or the prohibition of wine, etc.—will become a disbeliever (kafir).

And if a person denies such a consensus-based ruling that is known only to the scholars—such as a granddaughter receiving 1/6th of the inheritance when a daughter is present, or the prohibition of marrying a woman during her waiting period (iddah). Similarly, if the scholars of a particular era agree on a specific matter and someone opposes that matter, he will not become a disbeliever (kafir)." (Rawdat al-Talibin, Vol. 2, Page 146)

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 4 days ago
▲ 14 r/MuslimIndians

Awami League, Hindus, Awami Hindus & their power politics in the medical field of Bangladesh

173 BSMMU Doctors Freed from the ‘Aynaghar’ of Mental Torture

On August 8, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) (Bangladesh Medical University/PG) promoted 173 doctors simultaneously to the rank of Assistant Professor or equivalent posts. They received this highly anticipated promotion after waiting for more than a decade and a half.

It is learned that these doctors were recruited to various posts in the university between 2003 and 2006. Despite being eligible for promotion for over 15 years, they were kept "deprived" of advancement. Whenever the issue of their promotion arose at different times, it was denied simply because they were recruited between 2003 and 2006.

Most recently in 2019, the deprived doctors sought the shelter of the court, and the ruling was delivered in their favor. However, due to unknown reasons, the university authorities did not grant them promotions. After a long wait, they were finally promoted following the departure of Sheikh Hasina.

Those concerned allege that due to political vendetta and for being ordinary Muslims, many doctors were deprived of promotions for more than a decade and a half.

BSMMU: An ‘Aynaghar’ of Mental Torture

The deprived doctors have labeled BSMMU as an ‘Aynaghar’ (mirror house/secret detention center) of mental torture because of the unjust treatment meted out to them. They stated that they had to constantly endure mental agony and that the university tortured them in every possible way.

When asked, Dr. Ruhul Quddus Biplob, Assistant Professor of the Department of Neurosurgery at the university, told MediVoice, "We were victims of deprivation for so long. We lived as third-class citizens at BSMMU. We were subjected to abusive behavior. I am a neurosurgeon, but I was assigned to the General Emergency. They inflicted every possible form of punishment on us. Furthermore, they wouldn't provide us with rooms. Seniors were made to do general work. Meanwhile, right before our eyes, our juniors became professors and occupied important positions. Those of our peers who engaged in slavery and sycophancy for the government became full professors. Our promotions were halted by framing us with false allegations."

Regarding this, Dr. Md. Sahidul Islam, Assistant Professor of the Department of Colorectal Surgery at the university, told MediVoice, "I completed my post-graduation in 2010; by now, I should have been a professor, but I am merely an Assistant Professor. At one point, I felt that since I joined as a Medical Officer, I would have to retire as a Medical Officer. The mental agony I went through cannot be described in words!"

How Muslim Doctors Became Marginalized

BSMMU was established in 1998 through an ordinance. According to the ordinance, those working in the post of Medical Officer or equivalent positions at the university would be promoted to Assistant Professor two years after completing post-graduation, to Associate Professor after three years, and to Professor after five years. However, in 2009, Professor Dr. Pran Gopal Datta was appointed as the Vice-Chancellor (VC) of the university. Subsequently, through the 33rd Syndicate, he abolished the rules of recruitment and promotion. Since then, a rule was introduced requiring candidates to face a viva board to get a promotion.

The victim doctors stated that Dr. Pran Gopal Datta introduced this rule to create opportunities for doctors of a specific religion (Hindu) and blind Awami followers to secure jobs and promotions at BSMMU. During Dr. Pran Gopal's tenure, relatively less qualified doctors from the Sanatan (Hindu) religion were recruited and quickly promoted. Furthermore, despite having senior qualified candidates within the university, he introduced this rule to recruit Hindu and Awami-leaning doctors from outside. As a result, ordinary or differently-minded qualified doctors were deprived. By introducing this rule, Dr. Pran Gopal blocked the path to recruiting qualified doctors. He opened the door to destroying the country's health sector and medical education.

A description of how Muslim doctors were marginalized during Pran Gopal's tenure can be found in the statement of Dr. Sahidul Islam. Regarding this, he said, "The clause was abolished solely to stop the recruitment and promotion of qualified ordinary Muslims and dissenting doctors. In the viva, Professor Dr. Pran Gopal recruited and promoted Hindus and doctors of his own party according to his personal preference. No ordinary, qualified Muslim doctor was recruited. Each of us faced the viva board five to seven times, yet we were not promoted. Every one of us holds two to three degrees, but we were still denied promotion."

"In my own department, my student Dr. Krishna Pada Saha of the Colorectal Surgery Department worked under me and is 10 to 12 years junior to me. After the circular was issued, both he and I applied. I was not even given an admit card, whereas he was appointed as an Assistant Professor six to seven months ago by the former VC of BSMMU, Professor Dr. Sharfuddin Ahmed," Dr. Sahidul Islam added.

He continued, "In the Orthopedic Surgery Department, Dr. Krishnapriya Saha is two batches junior to me. He completed his post-graduation around the same time I did. He was appointed as a professor in the Orthopedics department three to four years ago. Similarly, in Laboratory Medicine, there is Dr. Debatosh Paul, who is two years junior to me. He was recruited here, got promoted to professor, then became the departmental chairman, and his tenure as chairman has now even ended. Examples like this are numerous. The picture is identical in every department."

Hindus in Most Important Positions

Doctors claim that Hindus hold all the key positions and administrative posts at BSMMU. As for the Muslims who are there, most of them are Awami supporters. Other ordinary doctors hold no significant positions and remain neglected.

Regarding this, Dr. Sahidul Islam said, "If you visit BSMMU, looking at the signboards or nameplates will make it feel like a university in Kolkata. All the key positions are occupied by Hindus—someone is a Bairagi, Datta, Das, Saha, Sen, Chandra, Omar, Krishna, or Krishnaa, and so on. In no way will it feel like a university in a 90% Muslim country. Here, ordinary Muslims are cornered. Not only that, they do not even get any good responsibilities."

Dr. Pran Gopal Behind the Marginalization of Muslims

The 'deprived' doctors have termed Professor Dr. Pran Gopal Datta as the founding father of the marginalization of Muslim doctors at BSMMU and across health institutions nationwide. It is alleged that Dr. Pran Gopal took every possible measure to corner Muslim and competent doctors. Succeeding VCs maintained this irregularity. To hold onto power and project a progressive image, they increasingly recruited Hindu and hardcore Awami-leaning doctors and placed them in all the key positions of the university. In some cases, if a Hindu candidate was available, they even bypassed Awami supporters. Furthermore, to retain their power, they kept Hindu doctors by their side.

The deprived doctors complained that Professor Dr. Pran Gopal Datta made desperate attempts to turn Muslims into a minority not just at BSMMU, but in all healthcare services and educational institutions across the country. In doing so, he utilized the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Health, and his followers did the same. Professor Pran Gopal also used to make recommendations for various appointments in the country's health sector, resulting in the exclusion of qualified Muslim candidates. In return, Professor Dr. Pran Gopal and his associates amassed millions of takas.

Regarding this, Dr. Ruhul Quddus Biplob said, "Circulars were issued for recruitment, but children, relatives of Awami families, and Chhatra League activists were hired instead. Hindu doctors were kept on the priority list."

How They Were Deprived of Promotions

Dr. Ruhul Quddus Biplob said, "Qualified Muslim candidates did not get promotions; they were deprived. They halted the promotions of nearly two hundred doctors. Whenever we entered the viva board, they would ask when we were recruited. Upon hearing the answer, they would say, 'Oh, you are from...', 'You won't get a promotion, you may leave.' After that, they would ask some absurd questions and end it. We were never granted promotions in any viva. Only Hindus and Chhatra League leaders were recruited. I have faced the promotion viva multiple times."

Regarding this, Dr. Sahidul Islam said, "At the viva board, the very first question they ask is, 'Which year was your recruitment?' 2003–2006. 'You don't need to give the viva, please leave.'"

When contacted, Dr. Kazi Mohammad Kamrul Islam, Assistant Professor of the Department of Hematology at the university, told MediVoice, "We want no doctor at the university to be deprived of promotion. Not everyone will align with Swachip (Swadhinata Chikitshak Parishad) or DAB (Doctors Association of Bangladesh); there are many ordinary doctors. I see no reason to deprive us. We possess qualifications far beyond what is required for promotion. We have the degrees, departmental performance, publications, and experience. We were denied promotion simply because we were recruited between 2003 and 2006."

Dr. Kamrul Islam added, "We are human beings and doctors. Our profession is distinct from all other professions. A doctor's promotion should depend on merit, qualification, and experience combined. Whether someone is Hindu, Muslim, red, or blue, BNP or Awami League—this should not be the criteria. Our stance is clear: we want everyone working at the university who is qualified for promotion to receive it."

When called to inquire about these allegations raised against the former VC of BSMMU, Professor Dr. Pran Gopal Datta, he could not be reached.

Source

u/HYDRURBERG — 8 days ago
▲ 5 r/MuslimIndians

(Things that break Tawheed)

(Nullifiers of the statement of Tawheed)

(Things that break Tawheed)

There are many things that break Tawheed. These can be divided into 3 types.

  1. نواقض كلمة التوحيد Belief-related nullifiers.
  2. نواقض كلمة التوحيد Utterance-related nullifiers.
  3. نواقض كلمة التوحيد Action-related nullifiers.

نواقض كلمة التوحيد
Belief-related nullifiers of the Kalima of Tawheed

There are some nullifiers of the Kalima of Tawheed that relate only to the beliefs of the heart, having no connection to speech or actions. They are described below—

(a) الجحود والتكذيب means denial or accusation of falsehood. Allah Subhana wa Ta'ala has said:

{ وَجَحَدُوا بِهَا وَاسْتَيْقَنَتْهَا أَنْفُسُهُمْ ظُلْمًا وَعُلُوًّا فَانْظُرْ كَيْفَ كَانَ عَاقِبَةُ الْمُفْسِدِينَ }

Meaning: "They (the Jews) rejected the signs unjustly and arrogantly, even though their hearts were convinced of them. See what was the end of the mischief-makers." (Surah An-Naml, Verse 14)

Allah Ta'ala says elsewhere:

{ قَدْ نَعْلَمُ إِنَّهُ لَيَحْزُنُكَ الَّذِي يَقُولُونَ فَإِنَّهُمْ لَا يُكَذِّبُونَكَ وَلَكِنَّ الظَّالِمِينَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ يَجْحَدُونَ }

Meaning: "We know indeed that what they say causes you distress; but they do not deny you; rather, the wrongdoers reject the signs of Allah." (Surah Al-An'am, Verse 33)

Sheikh ul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) says regarding this verse: "Allah Ta'ala denied Takdhib (accusation of falsehood) from them and confirmed Juhud (denial). It is a known fact that accusation of falsehood by the tongue was proven from them. Therefore, it is known that Allah Ta'ala denied Takdhib of the heart—meaning accusation of falsehood—from them." (Al-Fatawa al-Kubra, Vol. 5, Page 164)

(b) الإستحلال أمر معلوم تحريمه من الدين بالضرورة means to consider as halal (lawful) something that is certainly and demonstrably haram (forbidden) in the religion.

^(Footnotes:) ^(2.) ^(Juhud) ^(can occur through speech and actions as well, as it has three levels:)

  1. ^(Juhud) ^((denial), both internally and externally. This is the ultimate form of) *^(Kufr)*^(.)
  2. ^(Denial externally, but not internally. For example, the Jews denying the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him), even though they acknowledged in their hearts that he was a sent Prophet.)
  3. ^(Internal denial, but not externally. This is what the hypocrites did. Therefore, anyone who falls into any of these three types is a) *^(Kafir)*^(.)

^(3.')*^(Istihlal)*^(' (deeming something) *^(halal)* is sometimes proven through speech and sometimes through actions. For example, when a person does an act that clearly proves ")*^(Istihlal)*^(," as it has come in the Hadith narrated by Imam Abu Dawud (may Allah have mercy on him). Yazid says: Bara' narrated from his father, he (Bara') said: "I met my uncle, and he had a flag in his hand. I asked him, 'Where are you going?'")

Imam Shawkani (Rah.) said, "A universally recognized principle of Islamic Shariah is that the ruling regarding a person who disbelieves in or denies a قطعي (definitively proven) ruling, someone who considers something Haram (forbidden) as Halal (permissible), or someone who opposes or acts contrary to a قطعي ruling out of arrogance, stubbornness, or disdain, is that they are fundamentally deniers of Allah and deniers of the sacred Shariah that Allah Almighty has chosen for His servants. That is, he is a Kafir (disbeliever)." (Ad-Da'wah al-Ajilah fi Daf'il 'Aduwwil Sayil, page 24).

Shaykh Sulayman ibn Abdullah ibn Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdil Wahhab (Rah.) said, "Believing a consensus-backed Haram to be Halal, and believing a consensus-backed Halal to be Haram constitutes Kufry I'tiqadi (disbelief in belief/creed). Because only those who harbor animosity towards Islam refuse to accept what Allah and His Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) have made Halal as Halal, and what they have made Haram as Haram." (Tawhid Khalaqu, page 98).

(c) الشرك في الربوبية Ash-Shirk fir-Rububiyyah (Shirk in Rububiyyah / Lordship)

This means harboring the belief that the authority over creation belongs to Ghairullah (other than Allah) or someone besides Allah. Just as the ignorant Sufis believe regarding the Awliya (saints) that they possess the authority over various matters and the power to remove afflictions, and just as the Imamiyyah, Isma'iliyyah, and Batiniyyah sects believe that their Imams possess unseen power and authority over the universe.

Allah Almighty has said,

^(He said, a man married his father's wife. The Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) sent me to cut off his neck and confiscate his wealth.)

^(Imam Tahawi (Rah.) said, "What that married person did was based on) ^(Istihlal) ^((deeming it permissible). Just as they used to do during the time of) ^(Jahiliyyah) ^((ignorance). Consequently, he became an apostate ()*^(Murtad)* solely because of this action. That is why the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) ordered him to be treated like an apostate." ()*^(Sharh Ma'ani al-Athar)*^(, Vol. 3, page 149).)

^(Shaykh Abdullah ibn Nasir ar-Rashid states in his book titled) *^("Islahul Ghalati fi Fahmin Nawaqid")*^(, the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) ordered the execution of the man who married his father's wife and the) ^(Taqseem) ^(()^(Taqseem) ^(means dividing his wealth into 5 parts, depositing one part into the) ^(Bayt al-Mal) ^(and distributing the remaining part among the Mujahideen - Translator) of his wealth. And this constitutes a ruling of) ^(Kufr) ^((disbelief) against him from the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam).)

^(And his) ^(Kufr) ^(was due to) ^(Istihlal al-Amali) ^((practical deeming permissible), not due to) ^(Istihlal al-Qalbi) ^((spiritual/heartfelt deeming permissible). A group of scholars have classified this Hadith as Sahih (authentic). Among them, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rah.), regarding the issue of) ^(Istihlal) ^(in his book) ^("As-Sarim al-Maslul") ^((page 971), says, "First, the response to the objection: whoever considers a forbidden ()*^(Haram)* act as permissible ()*^(Halal)* is unanimously a) ^(Kafir) ^((disbeliever). For he who does not regard the prohibitions of the Quran as) *^(Haram)*^(, in reality, has not believed in the Quran at all.")

^(Similarly, he is also unanimously a) ^(Kafir) ^(who considers a prohibition of the Quran as) *^(Halal)*^(—even if he does not actually commit that act.)

^(Istihlal) ^(is having the belief that Allah has not made it) *^(Haram)*^(.)

^(Sometimes) ^(Istihlal) ^(occurs due to a lack of belief that "Allah Almighty has forbidden this.")

^(This happens due to a deficiency in faith towards) ^(Rububiyyah) ^((Lordship) and) ^(Risalah) ^((Messengership). This is purely disbelief, which is not grounded in any evidence. Sometimes he knows that the Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) only forbade what Allah forbade, yet he refuses to adhere to it and resorts to stubbornness. This is an even more severe form of) ^(Kufr) ^(than the former. This sometimes occurs despite his awareness that Allah will punish anyone who does not adhere to this) ^("Tahrim) ^(or making forbidden.")

﴿ وَإِنْ يَمْسَسْكَ اللَّهُ بِضُرٍّ فَلَا كَاشِفَ لَهُ إِلَّا هُوَ وَإِنْ يُرِدْكَ بِخَيْرٍ فَلَا رَادَّ لِفَضْلِهِ يُصِيبُ بِهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ وَهُوَ الْغَفُورُ الرَّحِيمُ ﴾

Meaning: "And if Allah should touch you with adversity, there is no remover of it except Him; and if He intends for you good, then there is no repeller of His bounty. He causes it to reach whom He wills of His servants. And He is the Forgiving, the Merciful." (Surah Yunus, Verse 107)

Elsewhere Allah Almighty commands,

﴿ مَا يَفْتَحِ اللَّهُ لِلنَّاسِ مِنْ رَحْمَةٍ فَلَا مُمْسِكَ لَهَا وَمَا يُمْسِكْ فَلَا مُرْسِلَ لَهُ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ وَهُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الْحَكِيمُ ﴾

Meaning: "Whatever Allah grants to people of mercy - none can withhold it; and whatever He withholds - none can release it thereafter. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise." (Surah Fatir, Verse 2)

Allah Almighty says in another place,

﴿ قُلِ ادْعُوا الَّذِينَ زَعَمْتُمْ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ لَا يَمْلِكُونَ مِثْقَالَ ذَرَّةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَلَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَمَا لَهُمْ فِيهِمَا مِنْ شِرْكٍ وَمَا لَهُ مِنْهُمْ مِنْ ظَهِيرٍ ﴾

Meaning: "Say, [O Muhammad], 'Invoke those you claim [as gods] besides Allah.' They do not possess an atom's weight [of ability] within the heavens or on the earth, and they have therein no partnership [with Him], nor is there for Him from among them any assistant." (Surah Saba, Verse 22)

(d) الإعراض عن دين الله لا يتعلمه ولا يعمل به

Turning away from the Deen (religion) of Allah, completely refusing to learn it and act upon it.

Allah Almighty says,

﴿ وَيَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَبِالرَّسُولِ وَأَطَعْنَا ثُمَّ يَتَوَلَّى فَرِيقٌ مِنْهُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِ ذَلِكَ وَمَا أُولَئِكَ بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ . وَإِذَا دُعُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَهُمْ إِذَا فَرِيقٌ مِنْهُمْ مُعْرِضُونَ . وَإِنْ يَكُنْ لَهُمُ الْحَقُّ يَأْتُوا إِلَيْهِ مُذْعِنِينَ . أَفِي قُلُوبِهِمْ مَرَضٌ أَمِ ارْتَابُوا أَمْ يَخَافُونَ أَنْ يَحِيفَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَرَسُولُهُ بَلْ أُولَئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ ﴾

Meaning: "And they say, 'We have believed in Allah and in the Messenger, and we obey'; then a party of them turns away after that. And those are not believers. And when they are called to Allah and His Messenger to judge between them, at once a party of them turns aside. But if the right is theirs, they come to him in prompt obedience. Is there disease in their hearts? Or have they doubted? Or do they fear that Allah will be unjust to them, or His Messenger? Rather, it is they who are the wrongdoers." (Surah An-Nur, Verses 47-50)

Imam Ibnul Qayyim (Rah.) said, "Kufr al-I'rad or disbelief of turning away means displaying aversion from the Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) with one's ears and heart. Neither believing the Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) nor showing enmity towards him, and not paying the slightest attention to the Deen (religion) he brought." (Madarijus Salikin, Vol. 1, pages 366-367)

He also said, "A servant becomes deserving of punishment due to two reasons:

  1. Turning away from the evidence/proof and harboring no desire to act upon it and its demands.
  2. Resorting to stubbornness even after the evidence has been established, and harboring no desire to act according to its demands.

The first one is Kufrul I'rad (disbelief of turning away) and the second one is Kufrul Inad (disbelief of stubbornness).

And regarding the Kufr that is committed due to Jahl (ignorance) because the evidence has not been established and it was not possible to know the evidence, Allah Almighty has stated that He will not punish before the Hujjah (proof) or evidence is established by the Messengers." (Tariqul Hijratayn, page 384).

Shaykh al-Islam Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rah.), while reviewing these verses, said, 'Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala has described that whoever turns away from showing obedience to the Messenger and turns away from his command is included among the hypocrites (Munafiqeen); he is not a believer. Rather, a believer is one who will say, "We have heard and we have obeyed."'

Therefore, when simply turning away from the command of the Messenger and desiring a judgment from others establishes Nifaq (hypocrisy) and expels faith (Iman)—even though this is merely an omission (Tark) which sometimes happens due to the dominance of desires—then what can be your statement regarding rejecting Allah's clear command, mocking it, or insulting it, etc.? (Meaning, these are also clear acts of Kufr) (As-Sarim al-Maslul, page 39).

Allah Almighty further says,

﴿ وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ تَعَالَوْا إِلَىٰ مَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ وَإِلَى الرَّسُولِ رَأَيْتَ الْمُنَافِقِينَ يَصُدُّونَ عَنكَ صُدُودًا ﴾

Meaning: "And when it is said to them, 'Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger,' you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion." (Surah An-Nisa, Verse 61)

Imam Ibnul Qayyim (Rah.) said, "Turning away from the Deen brought by the Messenger of Allah Almighty and rushing towards another religion is called pure hypocrisy (Khales Nifaqi). Just as pure faith (Iman) means submitting one's case to him and having no doubt or hesitation whatsoever regarding his judgment. Surrendering oneself to his judgment is contentment, preference, and love. This is the reality of faith."

A question was posed to Imam Shawkani (Rah.), and the question was as follows:

What is the ruling regarding those desert-dwellers who have only recited the Kalimah but do not observe any other rules and regulations of the Shariah? Are they Kafir (disbelievers)? Is it obligatory (Wajib) for Muslims to wage war against them?

Shaykh (Rah.) stated in response, "The person who abandons the obligations of Islam, acts opposingly to its laws, and acts with hostility against it and its adherents, such a person is undoubtedly a Kafir (disbeliever). His blood and wealth are completely lawful (Halal)." (Fatawa al-Aimmah, page 33).

(e) بغض او كراهية بعض ما جاء به النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم

Hating or disliking any part of what the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) brought.

Allah Almighty says,

﴿ وَالَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا فَتَعْسًا لَّهُمْ وَأَضَلَّ أَعْمَالَهُمْ . ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ كَرِهُوا مَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأَحْبَطَ أَعْمَالَهُمْ ﴾

Meaning: "But those who disbelieve - for them is misery, and He will waste their deeds. That is because they disliked what Allah revealed, so He rendered their deeds worthless." (Surah Muhammad, Verses 8-9)

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (Rah.), explaining the reason why rejecting any ruling brought by the Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) falls under "hypocrisy in belief" (Nifaqiyyah Takthib—meaning, a form of denial), stated: "Because whoever accepts the text of Allah and His Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) regarding the path to truth, and believes or trusts it, yet hates what he believes; he acknowledges it but feels aversion towards it, and harboring that aversion prevents him from yielding to his (the Prophet's) pleasure and command. He behaves in a way that says, 'I will not acknowledge it, I will not hold fast to it, I feel aversion to this ruling, and I hate it.' The Kufr (disbelief) of such a person is established through the definitive texts of Islam. The Quran is full of examples of this nature." (As-Sarim al-Maslul, page 524)

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 11 days ago
▲ 26 r/MuslimIndians

Audacity of hindus in East West University of Dhaka

These writings are from the toilet of East West University of Dhaka.

Anonymous hindutva threats on the wall of toilet. In Bangladesh these hindus are trying to make their existence visible by creating rape threat, bhagwa love trap conversion and by the dream of Akhand Bharat.

From few days as the issue with Ram Mandir in Gaibandha rising the hindus are becaming more furious more anarchy loving day by day. They are trying to come out of the shell. They are showing their actual face. Not a minority but as a population full of anarchists.

And the Government of Bangladesh (Hindustan) giving them shelter as like they are working for the government. Not a single F.I.R, not a charge against them. If it was India they would have witnessed the grave for doing these acts.

Now one can raise question that this can be a sabotage, this can be a work of fellow Muslim who did this to blame hindus. Why would anyone do such act where they are the minority themselves.

The way how, Palash Kanti Dey saying Muslim should leave Gaibandha if they have problem with Ram. Chaitali Chakravorty saying hindus need a state for them, they'll do it with the help of India. Kushal Baran Chakravorty visiting shuvendu and Yogi for Akhand Bharat. Monoronjon Madhu a job holder of Education Ministry saying we will start the war of kurukshetra to retrieve the land. Timple Paul a slum kid communicating hindu priests and leaders of india daily basis just to create an insurgency in field level.

After all these public attempts and speeches, the Bangladesh government didn't take a single action against them. And these scumbags are roaming around freely without any hesitations and tensions.

Now, if anyone says that these writings on the walls might be a sabotage from our side. Then I would say that the attack on Jagannath Hall in Dhaka University on the 25th march night was totally justified and need to do it again.

u/HYDRURBERG — 14 days ago
▲ 1 r/RoadBikes

Installing a tourney tz cage in a sora rd-3400 ss

Hello, a few days ago I bought a 2nd hand road bike.

The issue I am facing is that the total capacity doesn’t match the derailleur.

The bike has a Shimano Sora rd-3400 ss as a derailleur, which has a short cage; thus, the total capacity is 31 or less. But my bike's total capacity is 37, and the GS version of the derailleur has the 37 capacity, just because of its medium cage.

Now my question is: did anyone replace the rear derailleur cage of Sora with a tourney tz one's? Cause sora is discontinued, and finding a GS cage or a GS is impossible for me in my region. As it's unavailable, I was thinking of replacing the TZ medium with Sora's SS ones.

If anyone has done that before, then let me know.

Thanks

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 15 days ago
▲ 1 r/bikewrench

Installing a tourney tz cage in a sora rd-3400 ss

Hello, a few days ago I bought a 2nd hand road bike.

The issue I am facing is that the total capacity doesn’t match the derailleur.

The bike has a Shimano Sora RD-3400 SS derailleur, which has a short cage; thus, the total capacity is 31 or less. But my bike's total capacity is 37, and the GS version of the derailleur has the 37 capacity, just because of its medium cage.

Now my question is: did anyone replace the rear derailleur cage of Sora with a tourney tz one's? Cause sora is discontinued, and finding a GS cage or a GS is impossible for me in my region. As it's unavailable, I was thinking of replacing the TZ medium with Sora's SS ones.

If anyone has done that before, then let me know.

Thanks

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 15 days ago
▲ 2 r/BikeRepair

Installing a tourney tz cage in a sora rd-3400 ss

Hello, few days ago I bought a 2nd hand road bike.

​

The issue I am facing that is the total capacity doesn’t meet with the derailleur. The bike has a Shimano Sora rd-3400 ss as a derailleur which has a short cage and thus why, the total capacity is 31 or less. But my bike's total capacity is 37 and the GS version of the derailleur have the 37 capacity, just because of it's medium cage.

​

Now my, asking is did anyone replaced the rear derailleur cage of sora with a tourney tz one's. Cause sora is discontinued and finding a gs or a cage of gs is impossible for me in my region. As far as it's unavailable I was thinking to replace the tz's medium with sora's ss one's.

​

If anyone did that before then let me know.

​

Thanks.

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 15 days ago
▲ 26 r/MuslimIndians

A hindu desperado from Dhaka University Jagannath hall, threating Muslims on the topic of building ram statue in Gaibandha.

A hindu desperado, whose education expenditures are paid by Muslim tax payers. Who is standing on the ground donated by Muslim nawabs.

Threatening us for stopping the construction of ram statue in Gaibandha Bangladesh. Saying that he'll look after the Muslims on this issue. He's warning Muslims that he'll do mob in order to build ram mandir.

After standing on a Muslim land he is saying Muslims are fundamentalists. Yes we are fundamentalists. But on which neutralism you are bringing ram in Bangalah?

If you have the guts to build that by fighting then do whatever you can.

And a special message for the Muslims of Pakistan and India. Have some shame look at these herd of donkeys. They are few in number and do have these levels of guts to do mob by declaring it in public.

And the Muslims of Bangladesh, you people should know who are your ancestors rather worshiping mujib and 71. How they burnished hindus back in days. If you can't stop the project then you people should die in shame.

u/HYDRURBERG — 20 days ago
▲ 2 r/bikewrench

Rust on bolts and vibrating while paddling after a ride in rain

I do have custom upgraded mtb.

I don't usually ride in rain but yesterday I was trapped. In my city there's a huge problem of waterlogging. And the water is full of sand & wastes.

So somehow got into a situation that,"I had to ride it in that water". That was literally Knee level water on the road. So after reaching home I wipped the cycle primarily but in 3-4 hours I noticed that there is a huge amount of rust on the bolts of rotors and other bolts.

Also after that my cycle is vibrating while paddling. I have a deore m5100 derailleur. Is it just, the lube washed away by the water and catched some sand that's why it's vibrating?

Also some grease mark on the front rotor but not in the rear one. The rear one acts as soon as I press the lever. It stops the wheel immediately. But the front brake don't, it takes time there's no whistle from the front brake but it takes time. The brake is shimano mt-200.

Also for testing, when I hop on the cycle and press the front lever only and try to test the break the wheel moves on heavy pressure. But I have seen people doin stunt with the same break on front wheel.

Thanks

u/HYDRURBERG — 22 days ago
▲ 4 r/BikeRepair

Rust on bolts and vibrating while paddling after a ride in rain

I do have custom upgraded mtb.

​

I don't usually ride in rain but yesterday I was trapped. In my city there's a huge problem of waterlogging. And the water is full of sand & wastes.

​

So somehow got into a situation that,"I had to ride it in that water". That was literally Knee level water on the road. So after reaching home I wipped the cycle primarily but in 3-4 hours I noticed that there is a huge amount of rust on the bolts of rotors and other bolts.

​

Also after that my cycle is vibrating while paddling. I have a deore m5100 derailleur. Is it just, the lube washed away by the water and catched some sand that's why it's vibrating?

​

Also some grease mark on the front rotor but not in the rear one. The rear one acts as soon as I press the lever. It stops the wheel immediately. But the front brake don't, it takes time there's no whistle from the front brake but it takes time. The brake is shimano mt-200.

​

Also for testing, when I hop on the cycle and press the front lever only and try to test the break the wheel moves on heavy pressure. But I have seen people doin stunt with the same break on front wheel.

Thanks

u/HYDRURBERG — 22 days ago
▲ 13 r/MuslimIndians

Aisha rescued from Rishi Ashram in Rangamati after two months of being abducted after converting to Islam

Police raid Bengalhalia Sanatan Rishi Ashram in Chandraghona, Rangamati

​

Police have rescued a young woman from a traditional shi ashram in Bangalhalia area under Chandraghona police station in Rangamati. She was rescued on Thursday (June 11, 26th) afternoon on the basis of a court search warrant and a police request for concern.

​

According to police and local sources, Tanni De Ripanna (21), who took the name ‘Ayesha Siddika Zara’ after converting to Islam, has been detained in the ashram.

​

Later, the law enforcement agencies conducted a drive and rescued her as per the instructions of the court. Chandraghona police station officer-in-charge Md Saker Ahmed said the girl's house was found in Eidgaon police station area of Cox's Bazar district.A search warrant was issued in favour of Eidgaon police station from the Cox's Bazar court. Based on the requisition of the search warrant and Eidgaon police, Chandraghona police conducted a drive at the Sanatan Rishi Ashram in Bengalhalia and rescued the girl. She was taken to the police station for the next legal process. They will take all the next arrangements.”

​

It is alleged that on March 9, 2026, she was forcibly taken from her house through the Chawkbazar police station. Despite being over the age of eighteen, she was handed over to her Hindu parents against his will.

​

The day before she went missing, she complained to her classmates and seniors that she was being physically and mentally tortured and that her family could kill her or smuggle her into India. “Rescue me, they will kill me, they can smuggle me to India,” she wrote in a message on WhatsApp. Since then, there has been no further contact with her. On behalf of the college students, a third-year student of the philosophy department Md. Shahidul Islam filed a complaint with Eidgaon police station accusing Zara’s father Sanjit Kumar Dey and mother Tapshi Dey.

​

Later, the Executive Magistrate of Cox's Bazar filed a case under section 100 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the court. According to the statement of the case, Zara was attracted to Islam about a year ago and officially converted to Islam through an affidavit at the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Chittagong on 1 March 2026. The plaintiff alleged that her family became angry after learning about Islam and tried to take control of herself in various ways. On March 28, some people forcibly picked her up on her way back to Chittagong from Jagirpara area of Eidgaon.

​

The rescued girl said she had converted to Islam on March 1st. On the other hand, her mother claimed that the family members brought her to the Bengalhalia Rishi Ashram a few days ago for the purpose of taking religious initiation.

​

A sage from the Sanatan Ashram said about this,“The girl had been in the ashram for about two months. Many people come to the ashram every day. I didn't know she was converting to Islam. Her parents brought her here.”

​

​

reddit.com
u/HYDRURBERG — 23 days ago
▲ 0 r/SalafiCentral

Shaykh Muqbil bin Hadi al Wadi (رحمة الله) on the Saudi State and the Scholars behind Bars.

u/HYDRURBERG — 23 days ago