
Namma Metro's Blue Line deadline pushed again, KR Pura - silk board line commerical opening probably in mid-2027
1yr left

1yr left
It's just TN/KL state board school education repackaged higher education.
If they give questions beforehand or predefined set of questions for exams, then both teaching & learning failed
In 2026, if they ask to maintain class work, notebook, hand written assignment, lab record notebook etc🤡🤡🤡 that old school college is useless
Just ask your friends at IITs NITs IISc or even some private ones like BITS, Manipal, Amrita, VIT or whatever. All this old school nonsense won't be there
Most core engineering subjects should have a mini project evaluation weightage.
In my IIT H even math course had code implementation: lab simulation based learning using MATLAB, Python, Qiskit, and Excel/Simulink, etc
Some tier 3 college in my state give previous year question & teacher teach only those & not lecture the concept/syllabus.
Do all this nonsense & wonder why no placements or bad graduate outcome.
Eg in CSE/software, You have to go to company & work on large architecture, bigger codebase, you have to understand every system design principles, data structures, algorithm, optimize everything, work on math/stats & data, not get some questions & write answers. If you study in those type of colleges, your aptitude will not improve
It's just TN state board school education repackaged higher education.
If they give questions beforehand or predefined set of questions, then both teaching & learning failed
In 2026, if they ask to maintain class work, notebook, hand written assignment, lab record notebook etc🤡🤡🤡 that old school college is tier 4
Just ask your friends at IITs NITs IISc or even some private ones like BITS, Manipal, Amrita, VIT or whatever. All this old school nonsense won't be there
Most core engineering subjects should have a mini project evaluation weightage.
In my IIT H even math course had code implementation: lab simulation based learning using MATLAB, Python, Qiskit, and Excel/Simulink, etc
Reddit seems to discuss only Tech, R&D & corporate roles which it would create. I will talk about rest
Facility management & skilled trade:- Security guards, housekeeping staff, janitors, HVAC technicians, electricians, plumbers, and IT park administrators
Transport & Logistics: Corporate shuttle drivers, cab drivers (Ola/Uber), auto-rickshaw drivers, and delivery partners (Swiggy, Zomato, Amazon, Zepto).
Culinary & Hospitality: Cafeteria workers inside the tech parks, restaurant and cafe staff, baristas, pub workers, and corporate caterers
Consumer services: gym trainers, salon and spa workers, domestic help (maids, cooks), and daycare/creche teachers.
💪💪
Not just here. Anywhere.
kids with physical strength & popularity turns out to be bully
So, Matrimony/dating is fundamentally a supply-and-demand market. Men complaining about women having “high expectations” often have high expectations themselves.
I am gonna explain bit statistically..
In India, across communities, the population of girls & boys is broadly same. So there is no mathematical shortage of women. The issue is who wants whom.
Because asian tradition expects men to approach/request first, men often choose women above their own realistic “market demand” based on income, property, education, family status, etc. They approach, get rejected, and then conclude that “girls are bad” or “women have unrealistic expectations”.
That's not how matching works.
Imagine 100 men & 100 women: 20 men earn ₹20 LPA+, 30 earn ₹10–20 LPA, and 50 earn below ₹10 LPA. Suppose only 20 women are working, and only 5 of them earn ₹10 LPA+. If those 20 working women prefer husbands earning ₹20 LPA+, the 20 men in that bracket have plenty of options. If the other 80 men repeatedly approach those 20% working women, obviously, Rejection is the statistically predictable outcome.
That's basic supply and demand. Men can't demand a wife with similar CTC and then complain that women have “unrealistic standards.” Men and women don't earn the same on average, so identical-CTC matching is itself a selective preference.
So if top 5% with more than ₹10 LPA woman gets a top 5% Big Tech groom, calling it “hypergamy” or unfair makes no sense. That's simply supply, demand and mutual choice/preference.
If you think choosing a partner based on income is “brutal” or wrong, men are free to propose/contact to women who earn less based on above logic. They'd presumably face far less rejection. Yet most don't. Why? 🤔
Fun fact: The same guy will reject men for his sister because they're from a service company, earn less, don't own property,. etc.
But when women apply similar standards to him: “ஐயோ. Girls are too demanding.”.
So, Women aren't obligated to compensate men for their own bad strategy in the marriage/dating market. So, girls be ruthless & merciless in rejecting. When there are lotta better options, green flags, why settle for less?.
Note: I used income as just example to explain the statistics. lotta factors like compatibility, properly etc also comes into equation
It works like a full-time political party IT wing
btw, is there reverse gear in scooty?
Anything missed?
anything missed? add that also.
Many decades many local politicians spend lotta money on service, took local issues to ministry, got lotta schemes & projects. All of them are now shown as criminal.
But random guy as some saviour
All gen Z & alpha getting pukka brainwashed
JoSAA UG seats jumped from 34k to 68k in last 10yrs. What's your opinion?? Even PG & PhD seats increased too much. many new IIITs IITs GFTIs are established. New programs in AI, Cyber security, Semiconductor/VLSI, Energy, Robotics, medical tech, etc were added.
| Year | IITs | NITs | IIITs | GFTIs | Total Seats | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 34,074 | Inaugural year | ||||
| 2017 | 10,988 | Data grouped | Data grouped | Data grouped | 36,208 | 2nd year |
| 2018 | ~40,000 | Female supernumerary introduced in IITs | ||||
| 2019 | 12,937 | 19,911 | 4,408 | 5,483 | 42,739 | EWS 10% (partial) |
| 2021 | 16,232 | 23,997 | 6,146 | 6,078 | 52,453 | EWS 10% done |
| 2023 | 17,385 | 23,954 | 7,746 | 8,067 | 57,152 | |
| 2025 | 18,160 | 24,525 | 9,940 | 10,228 | 62,853 | |
| 2026 | 18,951 | 25,162 | 11,518 | 11,692 | 67,323 | today 138 central institutes participating |
So which is your opinion?
It's good for country's growing demand in quality STEM grads. Education democratic access improved.
It's bad saar. Degree prestige reduced.
Looks bit weird
144 exists for a reason
Some flag they are using