u/More_Squash_3345

Even in the opening weeks of Barbarossa, the Axis had already pushed hundreds of kilometers into Soviet territory. Despite this, their advance continued further, and as more and more land was taken, the distance between the frontlines and the original Soviet border grew and grew.

So how did the Axis supply their troops over such a long distance?

The Germans had previously fought across the well-developed road and rail networks of Central and Western Europe, leveraging them to allow motorized and armored elements to quickly move and be resupplied, but now they were in the USSR. The road and rail networks were some of the most undeveloped in Europe, and mud made using smaller roads extremely difficult. On top of this, the German and Soviet rail systems used different sized railways, forcing the Germans to tear-up Soviet rail everywhere they went in order to place their own.

It seems to me like this is an impossible logistical situation, yet the Axis managed to push all the way to the gates of Moscow and Stalingrad despite it. So how did they do it?

I've been really into amphibious warfare lately, and I absolutely love seeing the LAVs and BTRs/BRDMs in the water. In vanilla, this obviously doesn't happen much due to the huge single landmasses the maps currently are.

So are there any community maps or servers that use a map that would incentivise amphibious operations?

It's my first time torrenting, and i wanted to be safe by having a VPN, but unfortunately there were no VPN options i could find that provided P2P in their free package. Obviously I dont want to pay for that, so I went ahead and signed up for a free trial of Sharksurf VPN, which has a trial period of 7 days.

I understand that its customary to seed for other users to download easier, and im willing to do that for the short time that I have my VPN, but im curious as to what will happen whenever my free trial expires, and i have to return to a free VPN.

Will my ISP be able to see this and slap a fine on my door? If so, how to i disable seeding when that time comes?

I'd love to just keep seeding for other people... but i also dont want to deal with ISP shenanigans.

(Using qbittorrent btw!)

Due to the rules, I cant specifically name the title im looking for, but its a very specific RTS game which, if it has over 500 active players at any given time, id be surprised.

The issue is that ive found this game on only 1 site, and the only .rars I've downloaded so far have either been encrypted or had setup programs within the extracted file that were flagged as having malware.

I've used the provided search engines to no avail.

If anyone has any advice on how to dig even deeper and aquire this kind of niche title id much appreciate it.

Apologies if my tech understanding is limited, ive just pirated my first few games earlier this week.

I'm sure someone has asked this question before, but I think this would be awesome for singleplayer fans like myself.

It seems like over the last few DLCs and updates, singleplayer content has been repeatably ignored. This is a shame because scenarios and Army General campaigns are some of the most fun I've had on this game. I feel like the Army General is a very special and unique game mode that I very rarely see in other military titles.

If the devs do not want to keep creating this content (probably because it is not a profitable), they should allow modders to create custom scenarios and campaigns in the workshop to keep the singleplayer community around.

In the server list screen, pings are normal and do not fluctuate, but when I get into a game (Server said 62 ping US-MI), my ping will randomly spike to 200-600 ping for a few seconds.

Most of the time, ping stays normal, but during the spikes it obviously gets pretty hard to play.

Is anyone else experiencing this, or is this just a problem on my end? Other games are not really having this issue.

Just bought this game today, and it is absolutely amazing.

I've always been a fan of of RTS games in a historical setting. I've played hundreds of hours of Warno, Sea Power, Shogun 2, Company of Heros, and plenty others.

But this game tops all of them.

First off, the tutorial is super helpful. It took me about an hour, but it didn't feel like i was being forced to do it. The missions were still fun, despite me being put on rails when it came to what I could do. I feel like good tutorials that teach you "everything" you need to know are super rare, especially in the RTS scene.

Secondly, the amount of details and intricate mechanics is totally awesome. From being able to steal enemy tanks, to literally being able to loot individual grenades off of your dead men, there are so many tiny things that can absolutely change the direction of the game. I was on my first attack for Conquest, and by stealing and fixing an enemy 75mm, I completely turned the tide of the match by bombing the crap out of the enemy trenches. Despite the insane level of control and lack of ability to pause, i dont feel overwhelmed by it which is nice.

Finally, the feel and esthetic is perfect. I've always been a fan of the WW2 scene, and this game perfectly encapsulates my perspective of what this conflict would have felt like. Ontop of this, the details and attention to historical accuracy is beautiful. Despite all the details, the game runs amazing for me. It might just be my experience, but this game seems really well optimized.

I don't think ive ever felt such a genuine "oh shit" moment as when I was on the defensive, and while watching a horde of Soviets rush at my trench, realize that 80% of my troops had no ammo because they had literally shot it all.

10/10 game. Nice to see something cool and original come out for this dying genre. Shoutout devs.

There have been alot of metas throughout the history of warzone, but which one do you think was the worst? By the worst I mean either the most overpowered or most un-fun.

Me personally it was the RPK and Fennec in Warzone 2.0. If you weren't running that combo in season one, you were basically guaranteed to lose.

Second up is probably the One-shot doom shotgun. That things was annoying as hell.

There have been alot of metas throughout the history of warzone, but which one do you think was the worst? By the worst I mean either the most overpowered or most un-fun.

Me personally it was the RPK and Fennec in Warzone 2.0. If you weren't running that combo in season one, you were basically guaranteed to lose.

Second up is probably the One-shot doom shotgun. That things was annoying as hell.

Hey guys. As the title says, I am using Blackracks Sol mod, which creates a 1:1 scale solar system, placing the edge of earth's atmosphere at 140,000m (or 120,000 i cant remember). On top of this mod, I am using Principia and FAR (a mod that realistically models aerodynamics).

I'm in sandbox mode, and I cant tell if my engines/rockets are just extremely undersized or not, but i cannot seem to get my 3t satellite into orbit of the moon. I've been able to get a 4t satellite into LEO, but for whatever reason i cant seem to make a rocket efficient enough to get to the moon.

With my most efficient rocket, I was able to get into LEO orbit with about 1000m/s of deltaV to spare, but the injection burn costs about 3000m/s.

I'm sure with a few more launches I could get it right, but what im more concerned about is how the heck im going to get a manned mission into lunar orbit, and then to the surface and back!? The LM-CM combo during the Apollo missions weighed 45 tons! How am I going to do that with the engines available to me?

If anyone has any tips or tricks on how to maximize the efficiency of my rocket, that would be great, because if im struggling with a 3t satellite, im gonna have a fun time with the manned missions for sure.

Assume that the business owner could hire the employee without going bankrupt, but that it would still cost a significant portion of their profits. Also assume that the AI does the job almost as well as the employee.

• I meant to say Morally Okay/Good

View Poll