u/Weird_WorldInd

This query is posed to all guys/gals who are already DINK or CF couples OR intend to be one (like me)

I have been thinking this for a while and unable to find a convincing answer myself. If I choose DINK/CF, then why can't I extend the same logic to say, I prefer not to have 'marriage' to avoid potential headaches in the future?

Why can't I choose a Live-in relationship? By adopting this, both parties do not have to worry about post-marriage issues like separation, divorce, allegations about adultery, etc.

Would be great to get your views and that would help me.

One of the most common and major complaints so far is that the billing goes astronomically higher once you allow it to be changed to Adani smart meter.

Even Maha should have not allowed the mandatory imposition.

Your opinions please?

Source: https://x.com/i/status/2065360534258798964.

One of the most common and major complaints so far is that the billing goes astronomically higher once you allow it to be changed to Adani smart meter.

Even Maha should have not allowed the mandatory imposition.

Your opinions please?

Source: https://x.com/i/status/2065360534258798964

Errata: Typo "consumes" in the title. ...read it as "Consumer"

The above thought has been going on in my mind, particularly because of the increasing instances of religious disharmony.

Broader features of the suggested law are as follows:

1.  STOP any new places of worship – any religion

2.  If a total “STOP” is difficult or not fair, then introduce a “RESTRICTIVE” clause whereby, a new Place of Worship may be allowed ONLY IF there is no place of worship of that particular religion within a “Bus/Train” travelling distance of 10 Km from the proposed place of worship

3. Do not touch existing places of worship. Let it be treated as ‘fait accompli’

4. The trust or the proposer of the new place of worship to provide a legal declaration that no places of worship exists within the said 10 Km. The Govt authorities to inspect and verify the declaration.

I would be happy to receive your views

The above thought has been going on in my mind, particularly because of the increasing instances of religious disharmony.

Broader features of the suggested law are as follows:

1.  STOP any new places of worship – any religion

2.  If a total “STOP” is difficult or not fair, then introduce a “RESTRICTIVE” clause whereby, a new Place of Worship may be allowed ONLY IF there is no place of worship of that particular religion within a “Bus/Train” travelling distance of 10 Km from the proposed place of worship

3. Do not touch existing places of worship. Let it be treated as ‘fait accompli’

4. The trust or the proposer of the new place of worship to provide a legal declaration that no places of worship exists within the said 10 Km. The Govt authorities to inspect and verify the declaration.

I would be happy to receive your views

My reasoning: This establishment has employed multiple Central Agencies on the ground, all the time, to provide them the "pulse" of the 'thinking' amongst citizens on every single issue. Additionally, Crores of Rupees are spent on private agencies for the same information harvesting.

So, they may be warned that this "movement" has the potential to explode suddenly which is the last thing they want to happen.

Hence, Paw Paw will prefer to PRE-EMPT any such incidences so as to deny advantages to the opposition or CJP.

Hence, I strongly feel that the Minister will go... either through self resignation or dismissal (so paw paw can take credit) or quoting "health" reasons.

I would be curious to know views from fellow Redditors .

It's my birthday and the narc parents come to mind even though I am NC. It's not out of love.

I wanted to do something different to wake them up to realise that they were Narcs in the truest sense. Any thoughts?