MASS V. CLANCY: trying to understand objections during the defense’s witness testimonies
My apologies if this is a stupid question and if my court jargon isn’t correct…
Im obviously watching the Clancy trial and I’m wondering why the CW is having so many objections sustained against Defense when defense gets close to a truth that helps Clancy’s case? I mean obviously the CW won’t want those answers to be on the record, but it feels excessive and also… why are the objections being allowed? Like what rule is Defense Breaking in the way he’s asking these questions?
Sorry again if I sound so stupid lol. Just trying to watch this with as must education as I can