
I built a site that has at least 960K pages but it also has a lot of engagement am I screwed?
Hey everyone, I built indiedex.gg which is a search engine and recommendation engine to find steam games that normally don't surface on the steam store.
The way it works is that I consume all steam data, and enrich the data with social signals about each game and game studio. Then I do some data processes to make really good similarity and game suggestions.
Each game becomes a game details page and a games-like page, and each page supports 4 languages, currently my catalog size is 120k, so 120K * 2 pages * 4 languages = 960K pages.
However each page does provide unique value, which is the programmatic analysis of the game based on my data processing. For example, the game detail page will show this section:
which is unique per game, and based on not only the data from social signals but also my system's generated tags for each game.
and the games-like page does something similar but based on similarity signals and its own similarity analysis.
I understand google is cracking down on scaled content that it considers "not helpful", however, based on feedback from users and engagement data (average sessions are around 50 seconds, viewers visit 3.5 pages on average) I know the app is helpful and the people that love it, really love it.
I have seen a lot of different interpretations of what Google means when they say "scaled" and "helpful", but I don't really know what to expect here, this is the GSC chart, I launched this site on early August, and it seems the latest update resulted in a spike:
I know some SEO, but I am not yet an expert, based on your experience, should I be shitting bricks and expecting Google to decide it is my time and then have it kill my site purely based on the fact that I generate pages programmatically?
EDIT:
A bit more information if it helps:
This is how many pages are indexed
And the sitemap was submitted with ~21K pages