u/Bofact

I am watching the below video and I am puzzled by the below slide. What they mean by "Goods: ownership is transferred to customer"? If I sell a videogame and I give the customer a license to use it (moreso that I can freely disable that license), am I not respecting ITIL principles?

ITIL® 4 Foundation Exam Preparation Training | Key-Concepts and Definitions 2 (eLearning)

https://preview.redd.it/stg79zj7pvsh1.png?width=1313&format=png&auto=webp&s=03198b940dabb1746c04226b0d8a9cf6fb836a56

I am following Effective Java: Programming Language Guide, by Joshua Boch, and when showing an example of breking transivity relation in equals contract, the very first example of it says it is violating transivity (more exactly symmetry) because it doesn't work when comparing a Point to ColorPoint and viceversa. "No way" I am thinking. "We compare instances of different classes, then we are surprised it doesn't work."

I read in continuation, and the transivity problem is solved, by how I understand, by basically saying "just don't compare instances of different types, even if they have inheritance". I see no diferrence between the very first example and its "solved" variant with ColorPoint and Point having composition relation, not inheritance.

It wasn't like that until last year, or even this year.

AM doesn't work, csh and pcm doesn't work because of counter attack, vdk doesn't work, and LR (with Revitalize Elixir, Penitence, Pneuma, Elysium and Wizard) doesn't work. Sometimes with LR I can not fully heal after I get to 1 HP. And sometimes More attacks right after you go to 1 HP, because why not.

https://preview.redd.it/9fvt5oi9phnh1.png?width=979&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a26b75cc2189e5bac2cca5120cf87f2667442dd

Even though it was my first or second mastery rig I unlocked, only now I see the backside of it. Pretty bad we are not seeing it during gameplay.

Am fost la o farmacie cu o rețetă, iar farmacista a spus că întrucât mai sunt două bucăți pe stoc din medicamentul pe care-l vreau, are nevoie de buletinul meu.

De ce a fost nevoie să-l prezint?

Și pentru filtrul impecabil, nu, nu cer sfat medical sau interpretare.

Currently it seems that when a trial is selected and you press Y, the details about Invasion and Join in Progress are reversed: Join in Progress displays the value of Invasion; not sure if Invasion shows what is was selected for Join in Progress. This is a display issue; the options selected still work as intended.

Why does that matter? If you want to play invasion, the team leader selects a trial (via Genesis or Experimental therapy), and you press Y to verify if you are still playing Invasion, you would see that Invasion is disabled, while Join in Progress is allowed. So you leave, because the team leader baited you into playing other game mode. In reality, the Invasion is allowed and you can still be invaded.

Something (else) to note is that this bug was already reported. So don't send Red Barrels's support duplicates.

I imagine it is abysmal for Reagents to a level compared to Invasion in Nostophobia.

Like how it was before recently.

Nu doresc să descurajeze pe alții să urmeze această profesie, dar cum? La un institut de cercetare de la Măgurele se cercetează lucruri care au bine mersi nevoie de ingineri de reglare de la IS, dar nu, ei nu au niciun folos, nici pentru acele proiecte, nici pentru altele. (Și nu, nu cred că am permisiunea să specific la ce proiecte mă refer mai exact.)

Mă mai liniștesc gândind că inginerii de reglare care sunt acolo, dacă or fi, n-au motiv să-și părăsească postul, și vor fi posturi vacante doar când se pensionează ăia.

Cât despre angajare la companii de specialitate, nu cred că are rost să specific. E aceeași situație ca la programare.

If in professional setting, you are "exposed" if you are caught using pirated software(s), are you "exposed" if you cite an article which you pirated (and didn't bought)?

Suppose an article is written and cites few web pages to make a conclusion. Years later, those web pages are no longer accesible, not even via waybackmachine.

In these conditions, does the conclusion hold any scientific value? Because now the presumptions from those web pages can no longer be verified (since those pages are inaccesible).

And as a last question, if the web pages aren't accesbile via waybackmachine, but screenshots of those pages exist, along with the content referenced in the article, does the conclusion have a scientific value? What if those screenshots are fake?

Adică ai acele date, dar nu ști că-s acolo (de exemplu ai o poză, dar adresa de domiciliu al celui care a făcut poza este ascuns în valorile RGB din pixelii aferenți zonei care prezintă cer senin).

I have to print in hexadecimal with big letters value variable of type uint8. I am using fprintf(1, '%#X', value), but the 0x prefix is in upper case, while I want it to be lowercase. How do I achieve that?

I know I can write instead fprintf(1, '0x%X', value), but I want to do it by only modifying the formatting operators. And using fprintf(1, '%#x', value) doesn't print value in uppercase.

I have the following Matlab program:

syms t positive;

Z=laplace(exp(A*t))

ccode(Z,'file','cCodeTest.c')

I want to write the Z function to cCodeTest.c. The problem is that code is written to ccodetest.c, created before.

How to write Z to the cCodeTest.c and not ccodetest.c?