Is TikTok's comicbookrodeo a white savoir (how he misunderstood '68)
Comicbookrodeo might genuinely be the funniest example of fake intellectualism I’ve seen in comic discourse this year because why are we writing doctoral theses about a zombie Vietnam comic like it’s All Quiet on the Western Front 😭
Brother, it is a grindhouse horror book where dudes chainsaw zombies in the jungle. The fact that you’re sitting here psychoanalyzing Jungle Jim like he’s a real veteran instead of a guy in a haunted gas mask fighting zombies and Viet Cong is insane.
This is exactly what happens when internet media critics discover the words “trauma” and “representation” and suddenly think every piece of pulp fiction needs to function as a licensed therapy session.
The funniest part is how Comicbookrodeo keeps acting like he’s bravely defending Vietnamese people and veterans from this evil offensive comic when the entire book is basically just an homage to exploitation movies. You are not exposing American imperialism, dude. You are reading a zombie gore comic and pretending it’s a Pentagon psyop because it had a dedication page at the end 😭
And the PTSD discourse is so unbelievably forced. “Um actually PTSD victims are more likely to withdraw into themselves ☝️🤓” OKAY??? And Dracula victims usually don’t turn into vampires either but somehow horror fans survive the experience. Warface is not meant to be a DSM-5 accurate depiction of trauma. He’s a slasher villain wearing a human face commanding zombies. The fact that this needs to be explained to a grown man is crazy.
Also I’m sorry but calling the comic “irresponsible” because traumatized soldiers become violent monsters in a HORROR STORY is peak media literacy brainrot. By this logic:
- werewolves stigmatize anger issues
- zombies stigmatize infectious disease
- slashers stigmatize introverts
- The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is harmful to family businesses
Like where does this end 😭
And you can tell Comicbookrodeo desperately wants to be taken seriously as a capital-C Critic because every sentence sounds like he’s auditioning for a YouTube video essay:
>
The craziest part is that he openly admits the comic is supposed to be grindhouse pulp horror and then spends 9 billion words criticizing it for not being a nuanced anti-war memoir. That’s like watching John Wick and getting mad that it doesn’t realistically portray the socioeconomic consequences of contract killing.
And the “this is offensive to veterans” angle is honestly so corny. Nothing screams white savior more than some online comic guy deciding he needs to protect veterans from a zombie comic because they might accidentally see a cool guy with PTSD and immediately become stigmatized forever.
Not every story about war has to be a slow sad meditation on trauma where everyone cries in the rain for 400 pages. Some people just want to watch zombie heads explode in the jungle. That does not make the comic morally evil. It means you picked up the wrong genre and then got mad at it for existing.