Wife is free to do anything but it was not adultery. If this is not adultery then what is adultery.
Means I know as per feminist this was pretty normal thing and husband was wrong here for being insecure. And can't able to handle if wife sleeping with her BF.
But how can husband prove adultery then..
On Sunday night after visiting one of their relatives, Abhinandan and his son went to sleep, following which the accused woman, along with her friend, killed them by smothering them.
"Both husband and wife had frequent quarrels over many small issues. So, on Friday, they quarrelled. She decided to get rid of her husband and sought the help of her friend, and both of them planned it, and they executed it on the intervening night of Sunday and Monday," he said.
Police said the initial plan targeted only the husband, but when the son woke up and witnessed the assault, the accused allegedly smothered the child as well to destroy evidence.
He (son) woke up when this incident was happening. He saw that. The woman did not want to leave any trail or any evidence, so she killed him," the DCP added.
According to a formal complaint by Abhinandan's mother, Harini had eloped with Kumar about a year ago but returned home two months later. Despite this, Abhinandan accepted her back into the household. (So Basically He (Husband) is a cuck or Simp )
However, frequent quarrels continued.
Harini and Vinay have given conflicting accounts of the child’s death. While Harini is said to have claimed that Vinay smothered the boy, Vinay accused Harini of killing him. (Now Fever of love started getting decrease)
Such things are happening in far from cities those girls and women know how to use law even against their own father just think if it was someone else.
A many such cases are happening every day. But no system to report.
A 43-year-old tribal daily-wage worker from Ayyappancoil in Idukki, Kerala, named Saji Kuttappan, was acquitted by a Special POCSO Court after spending 18 months in jail.
His minor daughter had falsely accused him of sexual abuse at the instigation of her boyfriend and his mother because the father strongly objected to her relationship and excessive mobile phone use.
The 16-year-old girl grew angry after her father scolded her for spending excessive time on late-night phone and Instagram calls with a local youth and demanded she focus on her studies.
Prompted by the boyfriend's mother, an Anganwadi worker, who suggested filing a complaint, the minor contacted Childline with false allegations that her father had abused her starting at age 12.
Police registered a case under POCSO arresting Saji Kuttappan on September 17, 2024.
Saji remained behind bars for 18 months as courts exercised extreme caution given that the complainant was his own daughter.
His imprisonment left his wife and younger son in severe financial and social distress, forcing his son to drop out of school due to local stigma.
While Saji was imprisoned, the daughter invited her boyfriend to the house at night, where they were caught by the family and neighbors, resulting in a separate police case.
On August 16, 2026, Special Judge G.R. Bilkul of the Idukki Fast Track Special Court acquitted Saji after evidence proved the accusation stemmed purely from the father's opposition to her relationship.
This post is specifically for Indian Men. But any men reading this you should also do same.
How to Actually Contact Your MP/MLA (and Why You Should Ask for a National Commission for Men)
We talk a lot about men's issues in these threads suicide rates, custody bias, false case misuse, lack of any dedicated grievance body. But talking here doesn't move policy. Writing to the people who actually vote on laws does. Here's exactly how to do it.
Step 1: Find your MP
Go to sansad.in/ls/members (official Lok Sabha site). Filter by your state and constituency to find your current MP's name.
Step 2: Find your MLA
Go to hamaraneta.in/directory/assembly select your state, then your assembly constituency, to pull up your MLA. (Note: this is a private directory, not a government site, so always cross-check the name against your state assembly's official site before you send anything.)
Step 3: Get the email/contact address
For MPs, sansad.in lists official contact info once you open a member's profile. If it's not there, most MPs list a Parliament House or constituency office email on their personal website or verified social media.
For MLAs, check your state legislative assembly's official website (search "[your state] vidhan sabha members") this is the most reliable source for verified emails.
If you can't find an email at all, a physical letter to the constituency office works just as well and often gets logged more seriously.
Step 4: Write a short, direct email
Keep it under a page. Structure:
Subject: Request for National/State Commission for Men
Who you are: name, and that you're a voter in their constituency
The ask: a dedicated Commission for Men India has statutory commissions for women, children, minorities, and SC/ST, but no equivalent body to track or act on issues specifically affecting men and boys
Why: cite something concrete India's male suicide rate is consistently 2-3x the female rate (NCRB data, published annually), yet there's no institutional mechanism studying why or responding to it.
What you want them to do: raise it in the assembly/Parliament, or forward it to the relevant ministry
Even the courts are saying this isn't a fringe complaint.
This isn't just men on Reddit saying it it's now on record in Indian courts.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly flagged the growing misuse of Section 498A (cruelty/dowry law) in Achin Gupta v. State of Haryana (2024) and several other rulings, the Court noted that vague, "omnibus" allegations are often used to drag entire families including elderly parents and relatives living in other cities into criminal cases with no real evidence. In earlier rulings the Court went as far as saying the law had become "a weapon rather than a shield" in many cases.
The Supreme Court has also directed state governments to set up district-level Family Welfare Committees and to properly appoint and train Dowry Prohibition Officers specifically so genuine complaints can be told apart from false ones. That's the Court effectively telling states: show us what you're doing to screen out fake cases.
On sexual assault: under the old IPC, Section 377 was the only provision that covered non-consensual sexual assault against adult men (and animals/marital assault, in some interpretations). When the new criminal code the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaced the IPC in July 2024, Section 377 was dropped entirely, with no replacement.
A Parliamentary Standing Committee had recommended keeping this protection; Parliament didn't act on it. Today, if an adult man is sexually assaulted, there's no dedicated law for it the case can only be filed as generic "hurt," not sexual assault. This is currently being challenged in the Delhi High Court, which recently said it's a matter for the legislature to fix, not the courts.
This is exactly the kind of gap a Men's Commission would exist to flag and push on right now, no institution is formally tracking or acting on any of this.
Why bother
Nothing gets built without demand. Every commission that exists today for women, children, minorities exists because someone asked, repeatedly, until it became politically costly to ignore. A Men's Commission won't happen because we complain about it on Reddit. It happens if enough of us actually put it in front of an elected representative's inbox.
So genuinely take five minutes. Find your MP and MLA, send the email. Not just for a Commission raise whatever men's issue is affecting your life or community: mental health support, legal aid, suicide prevention funding, whatever it is. If we don't ask, it's not going to happen on its own.
I did my part now it's your turn, and If you foud this hard to do then Please stop crying over men's issue and understand that you don't want to do anything genuinely you just want to get attention by talking or post about cases happened with men.
Share this with your friends as well.
And Mods if possible then Pin this post, or make a similar post by yourself but make men aware of this thing..
How to Actually Contact Your MP/MLA (and Why You Should Ask for a National Commission for Men)
We talk a lot about men's issues in these threads suicide rates, custody bias, false case misuse, lack of any dedicated grievance body. But talking here doesn't move policy. Writing to the people who actually vote on laws does. Here's exactly how to do it.
Step 1: Find your MP
Go to sansad.in/ls/members (official Lok Sabha site). Filter by your state and constituency to find your current MP's name.
Step 2: Find your MLA
Go to hamaraneta.in/directory/assembly select your state, then your assembly constituency, to pull up your MLA. (Note: this is a private directory, not a government site, so always cross-check the name against your state assembly's official site before you send anything.)
Step 3: Get the email/contact address
For MPs, sansad.in lists official contact info once you open a member's profile. If it's not there, most MPs list a Parliament House or constituency office email on their personal website or verified social media.
For MLAs, check your state legislative assembly's official website (search "[your state] vidhan sabha members") this is the most reliable source for verified emails.
If you can't find an email at all, a physical letter to the constituency office works just as well and often gets logged more seriously.
Step 4: Write a short, direct email
Keep it under a page. Structure:
Subject: Request for National/State Commission for Men
Who you are: name, and that you're a voter in their constituency
The ask: a dedicated Commission for Men India has statutory commissions for women, children, minorities, and SC/ST, but no equivalent body to track or act on issues specifically affecting men and boys
Why: cite something concrete India's male suicide rate is consistently 2-3x the female rate (NCRB data, published annually), yet there's no institutional mechanism studying why or responding to it.
What you want them to do: raise it in the assembly/Parliament, or forward it to the relevant ministry
Even the courts are saying this isn't a fringe complaint.
This isn't just men on Reddit saying it it's now on record in Indian courts.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly flagged the growing misuse of Section 498A (cruelty/dowry law) in Achin Gupta v. State of Haryana (2024) and several other rulings, the Court noted that vague, "omnibus" allegations are often used to drag entire families including elderly parents and relatives living in other cities into criminal cases with no real evidence. In earlier rulings the Court went as far as saying the law had become "a weapon rather than a shield" in many cases.
The Supreme Court has also directed state governments to set up district-level Family Welfare Committees and to properly appoint and train Dowry Prohibition Officers specifically so genuine complaints can be told apart from false ones. That's the Court effectively telling states: show us what you're doing to screen out fake cases.
On sexual assault: under the old IPC, Section 377 was the only provision that covered non-consensual sexual assault against adult men (and animals/marital assault, in some interpretations). When the new criminal code the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaced the IPC in July 2024, Section 377 was dropped entirely, with no replacement.
A Parliamentary Standing Committee had recommended keeping this protection; Parliament didn't act on it. Today, if an adult man is sexually assaulted, there's no dedicated law for it the case can only be filed as generic "hurt," not sexual assault. This is currently being challenged in the Delhi High Court, which recently said it's a matter for the legislature to fix, not the courts.
This is exactly the kind of gap a Men's Commission would exist to flag and push on right now, no institution is formally tracking or acting on any of this.
Why bother
Nothing gets built without demand. Every commission that exists today for women, children, minorities exists because someone asked, repeatedly, until it became politically costly to ignore. A Men's Commission won't happen because we complain about it on Reddit. It happens if enough of us actually put it in front of an elected representative's inbox.
So genuinely take five minutes. Find your MP and MLA, send the email. Not just for a Commission raise whatever men's issue is affecting your life or community: mental health support, legal aid, suicide prevention funding, whatever it is. If we don't ask, it's not going to happen on its own.
I did my part now it's your turn, and If you foud this hard to do then Please stop crying over men's issue and understand that you don't want to do anything genuinely you just want to get attention by talking or post about cases happened with men.
Share this with your friends as well.
And Mods if possible then Pin this post, or make a similar post by yourself but make men aware of this thing..
How to Actually Contact Your MP/MLA (and Why You Should Ask for a National Commission for Men)
We talk a lot about men's issues in these threads suicide rates, custody bias, false case misuse, lack of any dedicated grievance body. But talking here doesn't move policy. Writing to the people who actually vote on laws does. Here's exactly how to do it.
Step 1: Find your MP
Go to sansad.in/ls/members (official Lok Sabha site). Filter by your state and constituency to find your current MP's name.
Step 2: Find your MLA
Go to hamaraneta.in/directory/assembly select your state, then your assembly constituency, to pull up your MLA. (Note: this is a private directory, not a government site, so always cross-check the name against your state assembly's official site before you send anything.)
Step 3: Get the email/contact address
For MPs, sansad.in lists official contact info once you open a member's profile. If it's not there, most MPs list a Parliament House or constituency office email on their personal website or verified social media.
For MLAs, check your state legislative assembly's official website (search "[your state] vidhan sabha members") this is the most reliable source for verified emails.
If you can't find an email at all, a physical letter to the constituency office works just as well and often gets logged more seriously.
Step 4: Write a short, direct email
Keep it under a page. Structure:
Subject: Request for National/State Commission for Men
Who you are: name, and that you're a voter in their constituency
The ask: a dedicated Commission for Men India has statutory commissions for women, children, minorities, and SC/ST, but no equivalent body to track or act on issues specifically affecting men and boys
Why: cite something concrete India's male suicide rate is consistently 2-3x the female rate (NCRB data, published annually), yet there's no institutional mechanism studying why or responding to it.
What you want them to do: raise it in the assembly/Parliament, or forward it to the relevant ministry
Even the courts are saying this isn't a fringe complaint.
This isn't just men on Reddit saying it it's now on record in Indian courts.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly flagged the growing misuse of Section 498A (cruelty/dowry law) in Achin Gupta v. State of Haryana (2024) and several other rulings, the Court noted that vague, "omnibus" allegations are often used to drag entire families including elderly parents and relatives living in other cities into criminal cases with no real evidence. In earlier rulings the Court went as far as saying the law had become "a weapon rather than a shield" in many cases.
The Supreme Court has also directed state governments to set up district-level Family Welfare Committees and to properly appoint and train Dowry Prohibition Officers specifically so genuine complaints can be told apart from false ones. That's the Court effectively telling states: show us what you're doing to screen out fake cases.
On sexual assault: under the old IPC, Section 377 was the only provision that covered non-consensual sexual assault against adult men (and animals/marital assault, in some interpretations). When the new criminal code the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaced the IPC in July 2024, Section 377 was dropped entirely, with no replacement.
A Parliamentary Standing Committee had recommended keeping this protection; Parliament didn't act on it. Today, if an adult man is sexually assaulted, there's no dedicated law for it the case can only be filed as generic "hurt," not sexual assault. This is currently being challenged in the Delhi High Court, which recently said it's a matter for the legislature to fix, not the courts.
This is exactly the kind of gap a Men's Commission would exist to flag and push on right now, no institution is formally tracking or acting on any of this.
Why bother
Nothing gets built without demand. Every commission that exists today for women, children, minorities exists because someone asked, repeatedly, until it became politically costly to ignore. A Men's Commission won't happen because we complain about it on Reddit. It happens if enough of us actually put it in front of an elected representative's inbox.
So genuinely take five minutes. Find your MP and MLA, send the email. Not just for a Commission raise whatever men's issue is affecting your life or community: mental health support, legal aid, suicide prevention funding, whatever it is. If we don't ask, it's not going to happen on its own.
I did my part now it's your turn, and If you foud this hard to do then Please stop crying over men's issue and understand that you don't want to do anything genuinely you just want to get attention by talking or post about cases happened with men.
Share this with your friends as well.
And u/mods if possible then Pin this post, or make a similar post by yourself but make men aware of this thing..
Whenever I get some free time, I grab my bag and head out to explore a new route and create new memories.
Same as title.
Husband needs to pay 90 lakhs within 12 months in his 1.61 lakhs of salary. Means his almost 6 years of salary.
So if we think that he have 40 lakhs of saving and for paying rest 50 lakhs he need to take personal loans that it will then he needs to repay almost 70 lakhs. With every month EMI of almost 83 thousands if he took that loan for 7 years of period. (I ADD THE CALCULATION AS WELL).
But a wife has no duty towards husband.
May God give same sense to those men who even thinks to get married even now in this country with this pathetic law and the type of girls nowadays are.
Same as title.
We keep saying men are "lonelier" than women. The data says something more specific — and more useful. Every few months this discourse resurfaces: men are lonely, men have no friends, blame feminism/dating apps/whatever. Let's actually look at what's measured before drawing conclusions.
The self-report numbers are basically equal. Pew Research (2025): 16% of men vs 15% of women report feeling lonely or isolated "all or most of the time." A 1% gap not statistically meaningful. Broader compiled data (American Institute for Boys and Men, Aug 2025) puts it at 20% men vs 21% women feeling lonely frequently. If you only look at "who says they're lonely," there's no epidemic that's specifically male.
So why does this keep getting framed as a male problem? Because the shape of the isolation is different, even if the rate isn't:
20% of single men report zero close friends 74% of men say they'd turn to a spouse/partner FIRST for emotional support before friends or family Men cope by withdrawing; women cope by reaching out to their existing network That's not "men feel it more." That's "men have fewer backup systems when it hits nowadays."
Here's the part that actually matters: the self-report numbers might be lying to us anyway. Multiple researchers flag that men are less likely to admit loneliness at all because admitting it is the vulnerable act men are trained to avoid. So a man scoring "not lonely" on a survey might just be a man who wasn't going to check that box regardless of how he actually feels.
This isn't proven with hard data, it's an inference but it's a reasonable one, because it lines up with everything else: men have fewer friends, disclose less, but somehow report feeling the same as women. Something doesn't add up, and underreporting is the most obvious explanation.
And before anyone says "well women don't hide anything" they do, just differently. There's a documented pattern of women masking loneliness through performed independence the "I don't need anyone, I have options, I'm thriving" posture rather than open loneliness. Different mask, same function: protect against looking vulnerable or undesirable. Men hide behind stoicism, women (per this research, though it's less studied than the male pattern) sometimes hide behind a narrative of choice and abundance. Neither is "fake" loneliness it's loneliness wearing whatever costume its culture rewards.
Now here's my actual theory on WHY men specifically end up with fewer friends: I don't think it's about being single. I think it's about chasing relationships too early.
Research on adolescent development backs this up in a specific way: teenagers in romantic relationships are less likely to form NEW friendships during exactly the years (early-mid teens) when friend groups are normally built and cemented. Romantic involvement doesn't kill existing friendships, but it blocks new ones from forming and if you're spending your early-mid teens chasing a relationship instead of building a friend group (thanks in part to social media FOMO making "being in a relationship" feel like a status requirement), you miss the window where guys typically build the friendships that carry them into adulthood.
This isn't male-exclusive as a mechanism it should affect anyone who does it. But I think it hits men harder downstream because men have fewer backup systems (see above: 74% rely on a partner first, most don't rebuild a friend network later). So a guy who prioritized chasing girls over building friends at 14-16 doesn't have women's fallback of leaning on an existing friend network when things go wrong later he often has neither the relationship nor the friends.
So my actual claim: the "male loneliness epidemic" conversation obsesses over men not being able to get partners. I think that's backwards. The bigger driver is a lot of men treating relationships as the priority during the exact years they should've been building friendships and paying for that trade later in life, regardless of whether they end up single or married.
Curious what others think is this something you noticed in your own life? Because, I have some real life examples too. So any Guy/Men reading this understand one thing having good friend is soo much Important espically nowadays.