Twisted Wonderland is basically Descendants meets Harry Potter
Silver is based on Aurora, with some elements of Phillip mixed in
>A cool and collected boy who guards Malleus like a knight. He is so low-key that his calm demeanor often crosses over into a state of visible drowsiness.
For those who haven't seen my previous posts
https://www.reddit.com/r/mbti/comments/1qof5i9/mbti_vs_ct_part_2_ti_and_fi/
>Now I will analyze each CT type individually against its MBTI counterpart. To do that, I devised the following system:
>I went through the CT database one by one, comparing each person through their PDB profile. If the profile had 100 or more MBTI votes, both the person and their type, by majority vote, were registered. This is to avoid profiles with too few MBTI votes skewing the data. If any of the alternative types received 50% or more of the votes for the majority-voted type, it was also registered. This is to account for people with ambiguous typings.
In this post, we will go over TiNe individuals, which, in the context of CT, means they have a vultology that is Reactive, Rigid, Measured, and Suspended. Their MBTI equivalent would be INTPs.
TiNes
Statistics
Unlike the other posts, given how limited the sample size is, it would be kind of pointless to delineate the numbers, so instead, in this section, I will elaborate on WHY there were so few TiNe samples.
This result is a rather predictable consequence of needing to use well-known public figures as the main samples for this analysis. The celebrity sphere is overall heavily biased in favor of Extroverts, likely due to the inherent proactivity that comes with extroversion. The top 7 most common celebrity types are all extroverted, while the bottom 7 rarest are all introverted, and the rarest celebrity type of them all is TiNe. So yeah, I saw this coming. To provide more content for the following discussion, I'd like to note a couple of samples that didn't meet the 100-vote threshold for inclusion but did meet the 50-vote threshold: Agnes Obel and Chelsea Wolfe, both typed INFP on PDB.
Analysis
The first obvious thing to note is the absence of the "INTP nerd" archetype (or "shade," as they are referred to in CT). As I have stated in previous posts, in CT, general interest in STEM fields is more strongly correlated with Te, whereas the nerd shade, who in MBTI is almost synonymous with INTP, is instead associated with delta types (Te-Fi + Ne-Si). The only sample that somewhat fits the "nerd shade" is Sam Altman, who is also the only sample typed as INTP. From a CT perspective, Sam Altman is part of the Ti technocratic idealist shade. As the name implies, these are people who use technocratic futurism to realize their utopian ideals, while operating based on impersonally defined principles. Which brings us to our next point: why so many TiNe were typed as INxJs? This comes down to the difference between how the two systems view Ni and Ti. In MBTI, traits like idealism and perfectionism are generally associated with either Ni or iNtuition in general, whereas in CT, these traits are strongly correlated with Ji. In CT, Ni (and Si) are not responsible for defining how the future SHOULD be; rather, on its own, they only determine how the future will probably be according to patterns and trajectories mapped in their Pi worldview, with a focus on avoiding unstable or unpredictable outcomes that would lower the reliability of their inner map. In contrast, the visionary archetype, one who aims to bring forth a utopian future as defined by their private ideals, would be associated with Ti or Fi.
I would also like to discuss the Feeler typings. As mentioned in several other posts, unlike in MBTI, where agreeableness is strongly correlated with Fe or Feeling in general, in CT they are seen as largely separate. As a result, Adaptive TiNes (Adaptive meaning a Fe-Ti user with an unguarded emotional attitude) are very likely to be typed as Feelers in MBTI, especially the females. However, I believe a few other factors likely contributed to the mismatch in typings. In MBTI, a focus on identity and self-expression is strongly associated with Fi specifically, while in CT it is seen as a feature of Ji in general. This, I believe, is likely partially the reason behind the INFP-typed samples. Lastly, because of the correlation between Feeling and agreeableness in MBTI, Thinking types are often seen as cold, insensitive, or unemotional. In CT, however, it is much more complicated. In CT, the Fe-Ti types are referred to as having a Measured vultology, which is because their emotionality tends to be very controlled, with their affect either coming out deliberately through their Fe or not coming out at all with their Ti. As a result, Ti-leads often appear unflappable and stoic. However, Ti-leads (especially Adaptive females) can also often display a lot of polite emotion, being responsive to others' emotions, not out of raw emotionality but as a form of social courtesy. All of this together can explain the Feeling typings on samples.
For those who haven't seen my previous posts
https://www.reddit.com/r/mbti/comments/1qt0v8c/mbti_vs_ct_part_3_ne_and_se/
Now I will analyze each CT type individually against its MBTI counterpart. To do that, I devised the following system:
I went through the CT database one by one, comparing each person through their PDB profile. If the profile had 100 or more MBTI votes, both the person and their type, by majority vote, were registered. This is to avoid profiles with too few MBTI votes skewing the data. If any of the alternative types received 50% or more of the votes for the majority-voted type, it was also registered. This is to account for people with ambiguous typings.
In this post, we will go over NeTi individuals, which, in the context of CT, means they have a vultology that is Proactive, Fluid, Measured, and Suspended. Their MBTI equivalent would be ENTPs.
NeTis
Statistics
Total sample = 31 people.
Top 3 most common types
Analysis
The first thing that stands out is that the vast majority of the sample individuals (around 2/3) were typed as high Ne types. This reflects the overall similarity between how both systems define the Ne function. In both systems, ExxPs/Pe-leads are associated with entertainment, comedy, and creativity, which is likely why about 41% of the sample were typed ENxPs. So overall, these results aren't unexpected.
One thing that you may note is the lack of "inventor" types. As explained in previous parts, STEM in general is more strongly associated with Te in CT, with what one would call the "inventor" archetype correlated with the delta types (Te-Fi + Ne-Si), especially the extroverted deltas (NeFi and TeSi). The closest to this archetype in the sample are Michael Stevens and Hank Green, who are both science communicators. In their case, it likely comes from Fe drive for human-centric self-improvement.
Lastly, I would like to speculate about the xNFP typings. The most common reason for a T/F mismatch between MBTI and CT is agreeableness. In MBTI, agreeableness is often correlated with Feeling. In contrast, in CT, it is treated as a separate trait, which means that Adaptive NeTis (Adaptive meaning a Fe-Ti user with an unguarded emotional attitude) are very likely to be typed as feelers in MBTI, especially females. Looking at the samples, I noticed that, particularly among musicians, there is a tendency toward emotionality and open vulnerability; however, this emotionality is still presented with deliberation of Fe, rather than the unbridledness of Fi.
For those who haven't seen my previous posts
https://www.reddit.com/r/mbti/comments/1qt0v8c/mbti_vs_ct_part_3_ne_and_se/
Now I will analyze each CT type individually against its MBTI counterpart. To do that, I devised the following system:
I went through the CT database one by one, comparing each person through their PDB profile. If the profile had 100 or more MBTI votes, both the person and their type, by majority vote, were registered. This is to avoid profiles with too few MBTI votes skewing the data. If any of the alternative types received 50% or more of the votes for the majority-voted type, it was also registered. This is to account for people with ambiguous typings.
In this post, we will go over NeTi individuals, which, in the context of CT, means they have a vultology that is Proactive, Fluid, Measured, and Suspended. Their MBTI equivalent would be ENTPs.
NeTis
Statistics
Total sample = 31 people.
Top 3 most common types
Analysis
The first thing that stands out is that the vast majority of the sample individuals (around 2/3) were typed as high Ne types. This reflects the overall similarity between how both systems define the Ne function. In both systems, ExxPs/Pe-leads are associated with entertainment, comedy, and creativity, which is likely why about 41% of the sample were typed ENxPs. So overall, these results aren't unexpected.
One thing that you may note is the lack of "inventor" types. As explained in previous parts, STEM in general is more strongly associated with Te in CT, with what one would call the "inventor" archetype correlated with the delta types (Te-Fi + Ne-Si), especially the extroverted deltas (NeFi and TeSi). The closest to this archetype in the sample are Michael Stevens and Hank Green, who are both science communicators. In their case, it likely comes from Fe drive for human-centric self-improvement.
Lastly, I would like to speculate about the xNFP typings. The most common reason for a T/F mismatch between MBTI and CT is agreeableness. In MBTI, agreeableness is often correlated with Feeling. In contrast, in CT, it is treated as a separate trait, which means that Adaptive NeTis (Adaptive meaning a Fe-Ti user with an unguarded emotional attitude) are very likely to be typed as feelers in MBTI, especially females. Looking at the samples, I noticed that, particularly among musicians, there is a tendency toward emotionality and open vulnerability; however, this emotionality is still presented with deliberation of Fe, rather than the unbridledness of Fi.