In this video, I break down the three ways China is leading the global green revolution, offering a better alternative to Western AI oligarchs, and building a more peaceful, multipolar world order. From dominating solar, wind, battery, and EV production to releasing open-source AI models that challenge US monopolies, China's influence is overwhelmingly positive. Meanwhile, the West abandons climate commitments, bans Chinese EVs, and builds dystopian AI for profit. If you only consume Western media, this might sound insane, but the data doesn't lie. If you are curious about other common critiques about China I made dedicated videos on Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and more, all linked in my China playlist. If you want to understand BRICS and the changing global order, check out my video on that as well.

The Mexican American War was an illegal war started under false pretenses to steal Mexican land. The war was so egregiously self-serving and an obvious lie that even other Americans, a people who have no problem stealing from other people, felt it was wrong.

Abraham Lincoln, that mediocre bastion of freeing slaves when convenient, openly called out the government for starting the war under false pretenses. The gringos then stole their land and now they bitch about Mexicans coming into territory that was never really theirs in the first place.

That is the nature of Amerikkkan hypocrisy. It is bottomless, shameless, and the sort of thing that only a dog could approve of.

Imagine being this despicable.

Many British historians and political analysts argue that the growth of corruption after India's independence was driven less by cultural change than by structural changes in governance and the economy. They contrast this with the British Raj, where administrative bribery was relatively limited due to institutional design rather than moral superiority.

After 1947, India adopted a socialist, centrally planned economy known as the License Raj. Businesses required numerous permits, quotas, and approvals for routine economic activities. This concentration of regulatory power in the hands of bureaucrats created delays and red tape, making bribery or "speed money" a common way to obtain approvals.

Another major factor was the politicization of the civil service. Under colonial rule, bureaucrats were largely insulated from local politics, whereas after independence, transfers, promotions, and postings increasingly came under political influence. Officials who resisted political demands risked punitive transfers, encouraging close ties between politicians and bureaucrats.

The rapid expansion of the state's role in the economy also gave lower-level officials significant discretionary authority while salaries remained relatively modest, increasing incentives for rent-seeking.

British historians note that the Raj reduced administrative corruption through highly paid elite civil servants, strict bureaucratic discipline, political insulation from electoral pressures, and a limited state that regulated far fewer aspects of daily life. However, they also emphasize that colonial rule was not free from exploitation. Rather than widespread petty bribery, the British Empire extracted wealth through state policies and taxation, a form of institutional economic exploitation distinct from everyday bureaucratic corruption.