u/TheReedemer69

I currently use Perplexity Comet, but I want something more capable for real multi-step browser work: researching across many tabs, extracting and comparing information, filling routine web forms, connecting with tools, and possibly running workflows autonomously.

I am considering Genspark, ChatGPT Atlas/Agent Mode, Claude in Chrome, and a custom Browser Use setup.

My priorities are:

• Strong reasoning and reliable task completion
• Ability to work across multiple tabs/sites
• Desktop support, ideally Windows

I just want it to be able to write and create its own tools on the fly and execute JS when needed.

I completed the assessment for the Welocalize/Welo Data Expert Rater Project – Italian. Immediately after submitting the final assessment section, the page changed to:

“We’re sorry, you can’t continue. Based on your responses, we can’t offer you this opportunity.”

There was no waiting period or manual review, so it appears to have been an automatic decision.

Has anyone else received this immediately after finishing the assessment? Does it definitely mean the assessment score was below the required threshold, or can it happen because of a technical issue, project capacity, location verification, or another account-related condition?

Did anyone successfully contact support and receive clarification or another attempt?

I completed the assessment for the Welocalize/Welo Data Expert Rater Project – Italian. Immediately after submitting the final assessment section, the page changed to:

https://preview.redd.it/hpwqo1nxxtfh1.png?width=875&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb4a6927b22311ba9649261102a156c9b4838d3e

“We’re sorry, you can’t continue. Based on your responses, we can’t offer you this opportunity.”

There was no waiting period or manual review, so it appears to have been an automatic decision.

Has anyone else received this immediately after finishing the assessment? Does it definitely mean the assessment score was below the required threshold, or can it happen because of a technical issue, project capacity, location verification, or another account-related condition?

Did anyone successfully contact support and receive clarification or another attempt?

I completed the assessment for the Welocalize/Welo Data Expert Rater Project – Italian. Immediately after submitting the final assessment section, the page changed to:

https://preview.redd.it/s3gfk28xxtfh1.png?width=875&format=png&auto=webp&s=47675621704c2640f1b9f44c20845ea703aa0f9b

“We’re sorry, you can’t continue. Based on your responses, we can’t offer you this opportunity.”

There was no waiting period or manual review, so it appears to have been an automatic decision.

Has anyone else received this immediately after finishing the assessment? Does it definitely mean the assessment score was below the required threshold, or can it happen because of a technical issue, project capacity, location verification, or another account-related condition?

Did anyone successfully contact support and receive clarification or another attempt?

I completed the assessment for the Welocalize/Welo Data Expert Rater Project – Italian. Immediately after submitting the final assessment section, the page changed to:

https://preview.redd.it/wzkpunhwxtfh1.png?width=875&format=png&auto=webp&s=cffb0d03a492e9ee3cf3a3319c85783bc116ee7e

“We’re sorry, you can’t continue. Based on your responses, we can’t offer you this opportunity.”

There was no waiting period or manual review, so it appears to have been an automatic decision.

Has anyone else received this immediately after finishing the assessment? Does it definitely mean the assessment score was below the required threshold, or can it happen because of a technical issue, project capacity, location verification, or another account-related condition?

Did anyone successfully contact support and receive clarification or another attempt?

I’m a non-EU student at Unitus with LazioDiSCo scholarship.

I already have more than 30 CFU, so merit requirement is satisfied. My concern is different: if I later leave Lazio or enroll outside Lazio, did anyone actually have to repay the scholarship?

Looking for real experiences with revoca, restituzione somme, or recovery notices.

I’m a non-EU student at Unitus with LazioDiSCo scholarship.

I already have more than 30 CFU, so merit requirement is satisfied. My concern is different: if I later leave Lazio or enroll outside Lazio, did anyone actually have to repay the scholarship?

Looking for real experiences with revoca, restituzione somme, or recovery notices.

I’m a non-EU student at Unitus with LazioDiSCo scholarship.

I already have more than 30 CFU, so merit requirement is satisfied. My concern is different: if I later leave Lazio or enroll outside Lazio, did anyone actually have to repay the scholarship?

Looking for real experiences with revoca, restituzione somme, or recovery notices.

I’m a non-EU student in Italy considering a University of Bologna Level I Professional Master, 60 ECTS.

Nuffic says Master universitario di primo livello is usually comparable to an HBO master, sometimes WO master. IDW told me a 60 ECTS master can be evaluated, but only after completion.

Has anyone actually used this Italian qualification type for Dutch orientation year / zoekjaar, or got an IDW/Nuffic evaluation for it?

Not asking for legal advice, just real experiences.

I wrote up an old OLX account takeover bug where the interesting part was not that OTPs existed.

It was that the lockout state still leaked whether the submitted OTP was correct.

The flow looked blocked from the outside:

wrong code → invalid code
too many wrong codes → try again later
correct code during lockout → try again later, but the invalid-code signal disappeared

That meant the rate limit was not neutral. It was still answering the only question that mattered.

Because the same verification behavior appeared across account flows like signup, login verification, password reset, and account recovery, the bug could become full account takeover instead of just a weird OTP-screen issue.

The persistence part made it worse: changing the password did not reliably kill the attacker’s existing session.

CVE-2021-21735 looks like a basic information leak at first, but the interesting part is the chain.

On the ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5, setup/wizard routes exposed PPPoE and WLAN material that should have stayed behind the authenticated configuration boundary. In some ISP deployments, that leaked PPPoE value could overlap with the hidden admin credential, turning a low-looking leak into admin access.

I rebuilt the write-up around the firmware routing failure, the wizard whitelist behavior, redacted request/response evidence, and the vendor-vs-NVD severity split.

I did some restyling and cleanup on my Zyxel CVE-2021-35036 writeup and wanted to re-share it here.

On affected Zyxel firmware, a low-privileged authenticated account could reach backend DAL/CGI logic that returned sensitive account and management configuration data, including higher-privileged local account information, FTPS-related credentials, and TR-069 secrets.

The UI hid or masked some privileged fields, but the backend still returned sensitive objects to a weaker role.