I keep seeing red light everywhere and still don’t get the middle part
I feel like red light therapy explanations always have a missing chapter. One sentence is basically “specific light is used on the skin,” then suddenly the next sentence is wavelengths, timing, distance, and people comparing months of routines. I get that it isn’t the same thing as turning a regular lamp red, but what I’m missing is the simple middle step between light reaching the skin and whatever people are hoping to track over time.
Also, why does consistency seem to matter so much if the whole thing is just light exposure? I’m not looking for a device recommendation or a list of skin promises because that’s honestly what made this confusing in the first place.
If you had to explain what red light therapy is doing to someone without using marketing language or turning it into a biology lecture, what’s the simplest explanation that is still basically accurate?