This happened on the German autobahn.
The driver survived unparalysed and is expected to recover in a few months. He admitted the tyres used at the time were recalled Goodyear tyres
For context:
The man with the camera is Andy Ngo, a right-wing influencer who supposedly documents "Antifa and Muslim violence", though his work has been disputed by journalists. He has been accused of sharing misleading or selective material, and has been described as a provocateur who secretly starts the violence he "reports" in the first place.
And the whole "Strawman" concept here revolves around taking a comic with a clear strawman/caricature and recoloring/detailing them to illustrate how the Oricorio is just making stuff up in order to feel clever/mad at a non-existent/rare scenario.
Also, it's interesting how Stonetoss draws Ngo as if he were white, solely due to how Ngo agrees with his politics. Ordinarily, he draws east-Asians with Springfield-yellow skin, eyes you could blindfold with dental floss and front-teeth you'd need to clean with a car wash mitt, but only so long as they disagree with him.
I actually gotta give some credit where it's due here; this comic is actually pleasing to the eye and doesn't look like ST dragged himself into drawing it because he's gotta eat.
But the day he doesn't ruin good art with bigotry is the day a whole flock of pigs soar clear over Hell's frostiest glaciers.
I have everything set to Dark Mode, and it still feels like searing my eyes out at 3AM
NOTE FOR MODS: If you've seen I've deleted and reuploaded this several times, it's because I kept accidentally formatting the title wrong XD
As for the OG, Tosspot acts like he knows so much about transgenderness, but if he did, he'd know it's not a sexuality.
Just in case someone thinks I'm worthy of the "LEAVE THE MULTIBILLION DOLLAR CORPORATION ALONE" image, I'm not sticking up for big companies that actually slack off.
To put it another way, some people will take, say, a short, five-second reanimation of a scene from a TV show and be like "OMG WHY COULDN'T WE HAVE THIS KIND OF ANIMATION!", even if the original is not badly animated at all. All that is completely ignoring the fact that it was made by a fan with essentially infinite time and no need to worry about budget.
The studio making the original, on the other hand, is juggling multiple episodes of animation that total, like, 264x as much time as the fan-reanimated scene, also working with a budget and paying animators, voice actors, translators, recording studios, audio mixers and more, coordinating to get it released overseas, adhering to strict deadlines, etc.
It's the same thing with this, where someone makes a fan game out of passion that adheres to maybe a niche audience or a translation of an existing game in a language that's too small to justify opening branches for officially, and people act like the original company got owned by one guy in his bedroom or something. Apples to oranges.
Today I had my wallet stolen, so I had to cancel my card and get it replaced. Once I got all the information for it and transferred it to Google Wallet (so I wouldn't have no way of buying anything. My bank told me to do this), every time I scan my phone to purchase something at a shop, the screen reads something like "TRY AGAIN", and the card reader says it could not read my card.
I have phoned my bank about this, and they say there are no blocks on my account or anything. I have also reset my phone, but nothing changed.
EDIT: Uninstalled/reinstalled the app, then removed/readded my card. It seems to be working now
For context, a Motte-and-Bailey fallacy is when someone has a very bold, objectively unpopular and hard-to-argue position, which they say within peers who hold that same position, but switch to a lightened, often very sane-washed version of that position when someone who disagrees challenges them on it.
However, what I constantly see people forget is that people have to push the bailey before it can be called out as a Motte-and-Bailey. Half the time I see someone claim M&B, the person/side they're arguing said literally nothing wrong and the guy just made up crazy desires/ideologies they supposedly follow.