Login

u/acceptable_nature_4

r/UnapologeticallyHindu r/Indianlaw r/Hyderabad_city r/PublicFreakout r/TheIndianRepublic r/IndiaChronicle r/RightWingIndia r/SouthernIndia r/hyderabad r/bihar r/MadhyaPradesh r/IndiaPulse_ r/DravidianDawn r/politicalhindus r/AskIndianMen r/politicalhinduism r/southindia_ r/bondhustreams r/inIndiannews r/Telangana r/TheBetterIndia r/IndiaSpeaks r/indianmemer r/indiadiscussion r/Kolkatacity r/AwwwIndia r/AgainstHinduphobia r/TeenBihar r/IndiaTech r/HindutvaRises r/Real_teenindia r/unfilteredindia r/CBSEboards r/India_Bharat_ r/CalcuttaUnfiltered
In the name of gen z party, why are they spreading hatred/racism against specially Hindus/Indians
▲ 1.7k r/RightWingIndia+3 crossposts

In the name of gen z party, why are they spreading hatred/racism against specially Hindus/Indians

Just see the amount of upvotes there. Isn't racist posts as posted by some foreigners?

u/Jolly_Law1994 — 1 day ago
▲ 235 r/DravidianDawn+3 crossposts

Do you agree, Andhra and Telangana people? I do

At first I thought, how?, then I started to agree, cos I saw with my own eyes the dhwaja stambh, lighting Diyas, etc.

u/acceptable_nature_4 — 6 days ago
▲ 1.4k r/indianmemer+2 crossposts

Is Wikipedia still the free encyclopedia, or has it become an ideological gatekeeper?

When Elon Musk first claimed that a small group of Wikipedia editors could shape narratives and push a particular ideology, I dismissed it. Given his political leanings, I assumed it was just propaganda.

But then Wikipedia banned its own co-founder, Larry Sanger, after he publicly argued that the platform should become more balanced and consider a broader range of credible sources. Wikipedia says he violated its community rules, while Sanger says he was punished for challenging the status quo.

This also matters for India. Millions of students, journalists, researchers, and even AI tools rely on Wikipedia as a primary source of information. If there are concerns about editorial bias or governance, they could influence how Indian history, politics, culture, and current events are presented to the world.

If even a co-founder can be blocked for questioning how the platform is governed, is Wikipedia's editorial process truly open and neutral, or does it have a governance problem?

Source: [New York Post, Business Standard ]

u/NoMedicine3572 — 9 days ago