Somerville is intentionally making roads harder to drive on. It’s getting results.

Somerville is intentionally making roads harder to drive on. It’s getting results.

SOMERVILLE — For years, cars driving onto Tufts Street had it easy. A gently curved entrance allowed for a smooth turn that gave way to a wide, linear road stretching about 1,000 feet parallel with McGrath Highway, with just some narrow sidewalks on either side.

It was the way you would build it if you wanted to make it as easy as possible to drive.

But that is no longer what the densest city in New England wants.

Today, this section of pavement in East Somerville hardly looks like a road at all. Renovations underway since summer 2025 and set to wrap up in the coming days include all-new signage and pavement markings, speed humps, windy curbs, and artificially narrow sections — capped off by a mammoth new mural that is several hundred feet wide — that give it the feel of something else entirely.

It’s a “neighborway,” one of several experiments in extreme street makeovers in Somerville as the city tries to prevent deadly crashes on its roads by intentionally making it harder to drive on them, turning side streets into comfortable routes for people who aren’t traveling by car, and cutting down on the risk posed by too many cars going too fast.

“Think about everything everybody knows about the interstate highway system. Curvilinear geometry and wide lanes are designed for cars and trucks to move fast,” said Brad Rawson, Somerville’s director of transportation and infrastructure.

Somerville, on this street, tried to do the opposite.

“Tight corners, narrow geometry, narrow lanes are designed to slow down traffic,” Rawson said. “That is the best practice around North America that cities like Somerville are implementing to save lives.”

This is not the city’s first “neighborway.” The term is used here and elsewhere to describe streets where cars pass by so slowly and carefully that people feel comfortable walking their dog or letting kids ride their bikes in the street.

It happens naturally on many quiet roads in Somerville that primarily serve the families who live near them. But sometimes it takes speed humps or “sharrows” — arrows reminding drivers and cyclists to share the road — or miniature rotaries to make it happen.

The process has not always gone smoothly. New speed humps a few years ago caught some by surprise. Drivers have sometimes found the tiny rotaries bewildering.

But the city has been getting results: It has not had a single traffic death in four years, despite having a large number of cyclists. Traffic deaths and injuries in Boston, Cambridge, and other cities across the state highlight perils on the road for cyclists and pedestrians. So the feat is drawing attention to the sometimes peculiar way Somerville does things on its roads, and maybe providing a roadmap for transportation planners elsewhere.

Tufts Street became a focus after neighbors complained the road had become a popular cut-through for people hoping to avoid traffic near the highway. A city-run study found that, before the renovation, as many as 3,000 cars used the street each day, often at high speeds. It posed risks to families living nearby, bikers heading to the Somerville Community Path and newly opened East Somerville MBTA stop, and kids at a nearby early childhood center.

“They were flying,” said Bernie, 59, who lives in a mixed-income housing complex on the street and asked for his last name not to be published to protect his privacy.

In public meetings, neighbors weighed options for calming things down, among them turning the road into a one-way street. But a neighborway, which allowed travel in both directions while narrowing the road and turning it into a quasi-obstacle course, was the result.

A highlight of the changes are new “pinch points,” where curbs jut out and create a gap that only one car can fit through at a time. Drivers traveling in opposite directions have to slow down, or even pull over and stop, to let one another pass.

“I call it Somerville chicken,” Mayor Jake Wilson said in an interview. “Typically, it works itself out. Someone pulls over, the other person goes, and then you proceed. People figure it out.”

Not all neighbors are convinced that the unusual road layout will do the trick.

“I don’t know if it helps because people still zoom through,” said Billy Kan, a 28-year-old real estate developer who lives in the neighborhood and was out walking his dog, an 11-year-old Havanese named Wally. “The people who are going to speed are going to speed.”

And not everyone who lives nearby and will be driving on it loves the added challenge behind the wheel.

“I hate driving on Tufts because of those narrow things,” said Michael Pauls, a 28-year-old software engineer, who moved to the street after relocating from Chicago earlier this year. “I can see the rationale behind it if the city wants to keep people from gunning it, but from a driver’s perspective, I don’t like it.”

Some of the changes are more subtle. Call them psychological traffic calming.

Like new pavement markings to warn drivers about sharing the road with cyclists, which include an image of what appears to be a child riding a bike, instead of the usual stick figure.

The idea is that a driver might be more careful if their first thought was it might be a little kid, instead of an ornery adult, behind the handlebars.

“We’re trying to illustrate that biking is for everybody, not just for older, male-identifying people, which is sometimes some of the stereotype and some of the narrative,” Rawson said. “Everybody bikes.”

Even the 300-foot mural is meant to be a deterrent for driving too fast. Painted on what had long been the large blank wall of an industrial building, it’s a pleasant pop of color. It’s also meant to make the area look less like a back alley, and more like a place where people actually live.

“Before, when I first moved to the area, the wall was a giant swath of dirty white concrete,” Nova Reilly, an artist who lives in the neighborhood and was hired to help paint the mural, said in a video about the project. “Now it’s a very beautiful community contribution.”

In the future, Somerville hopes to see the thinking behind this makeover applied not just to other side streets, but to major roadways that officials believe should move more slowly than they do currently. That includes McGrath Highway itself, which has long been called unsafe by residents and is set for a major renovation as soon as in 2028.

“We’re excited for the McGrath to be more like a city street than a freeway, because we want it to be for Somervillians,” Wilson said, “as opposed to serving as a commuter highway through the middle of our city.”

Spencer Buell can be reached at spencer.buell@globe.com. Follow him u/SpencerBuell.

bostonglobe.com
u/bostonaruban66 — 11 days ago

State approves contract for long-awaited Mystic River bike and walking bridge

Sometimes, if you want to get it right, you need to start over. And wait. And spend a lot more.

The long-planned and eagerly awaited bike and pedestrian bridge across the Mystic River between Everett and Somerville is now moving forward again, after fits and starts.

The Massachusetts Department of Transportation this week announced it has approved a $78.7 million contract to begin the work of designing and building the roughly 800-foot-long bridge, which would be one of the largest of its kind in the Boston area.

When finished, the bridge would run between Somerville’s Assembly Row and the boardwalk of the Encore casino in Everett. It would provide a link to the Northern Strand Community Trail path, which runs all the way to Lynn, a short distance from Nahant Beach. It is also intended to be how thousands of soccer fans will cross the river on the way to the soccer stadium the Kraft Group has proposed nearby.

“Executing this contract brings us another step closer to delivering a safer, multimodal transportation network connecting residents and communities of Everett, Somerville and the entire region,” said Phil Eng, the state’s interim secretary of transportation and MBTA general manager, in a statement.

It has been quite the journey to get to this point.

Dreams of a footbridge at this spot date back to before the Everett casino was built in 2019, when both state officials and gaming executives were envisioning how best to get people across the water. There were other ideas (remember the gondolas?).

State officials released plans for a bridge in 2021, estimating the cost at about $37 million.

But progress came to a halt amid pushback over, among other complaints, the proposed width of the path. Transit advocates said the bridge as designed was too narrow to safely fit all the people who would want to use it on foot, by bike, or some other means at the same time.

The state started the design process over again, many years passed, and the cost of the project jumped.

And it will be so much better for it, Somerville Mayor Jake Wilson said on Friday.

“It was worth the fight,” Wilson said. “I’m thankful that people came together and spoke up for the the wider bridge, which did a big favor in the long run to the infrastructure. We’re going to need that with the crowds that we’re going to see.”

Across the water, Everett Mayor Robert J. Van Campen is also celebrating, saying in a statement that it’s “an exciting milestone for Everett and a project that will fundamentally change how our residents connect to the region.”

The work comes also as plans are drawn up for a renovation of the Assembly Row MBTA stop to allow people to enter and exit the Orange Line from the side of the station that faces the river. The agreement the Kraft Group signed with Boston and Everett over the proposed soccer stadium includes $17.5 million for a new entrance to the station.

For his part, Wilson, an avowed soccer guy, is already envisioning the mass of fans who might one day stream from Somerville to Everett on future game days after the stadium is built.

“I’d love to see a march across that bridge of Revs supporters from Assembly — after they spend their their dollars and give us that meals excise tax revenue,” he said. “That bridge is gonna convince me to get season tickets.”

Spencer Buell can be reached at spencer.buell@globe.com. Follow him u/SpencerBuell.

bostonglobe.com
u/bostonaruban66 — 19 days ago
▲ 42 r/Aruba

Why was the North Coast closed?

Last week, tour operators blocked a roundabout in protest. They are angry about the closure of routes along Aruba’s north coast. They say their businesses and hundreds of jobs are at risk, and they want the government to find a solution that allows them to continue operating.

At the same time, Aruba Birdlife Conservation, led by Greg Peterson, went to court against the Government and the Aruba Conservation Foundation over damage caused by ATV and UTV activity.

This has created a lot of confusion. Why does the government have to do what ABC says? Why doesn’t the minister simply reopen the roads? Did Greg Peterson close the north coast? Did a judge decide that ATVs and UTVs are prohibited?

To understand what is happening, we need to go back to the beginning, and we need to understand something very basic about how Aruba works.

## Who decides what?

Aruba has a Parliament, a Government, and a Court. They do different things. Parliament makes laws and oversees the work of the Government. The Government runs the country. Ministers make decisions and set policy, but they must do so within the law. The Government is also responsible for enforcing the rules.

And then there is the Court. A judge does not run Aruba. A judge does not decide Aruba’s tourism policy. A judge does not wake up one morning and decide which roads should be open.

The Court becomes involved when there is a legal dispute. Anyone can go to court and say, “I don’t believe the Government is complying with the law.” The Government can defend itself. The judge looks at the law, listens to both sides, and decides who is right — legally.

And yes, the Government must obey the law. A minister cannot ignore a legal rule simply because that rule has become unpopular. That is an essential part of a democracy.

## What does this have to do with the ROPv?

A lot.

ROPv stands for *Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelingsplan met Voorschriften* — the Spatial Development Plan with Regulations. The name sounds complicated, but the idea is simple. Some areas are designated for homes, some for businesses, others for tourism, and others have important natural value. The ROPv establishes rules for what can happen in each area.

The ROPv did not suddenly appear because Greg Peterson complained about ATVs.

The public process took place years ago.

In September 2019, the Government held public consultations in Oranjestad, Noord, and San Nicolas. People could ask questions and give their opinions. The proposed ROPv was also available at DIP and online, and citizens and organizations could submit a formal response, known as a “zienswijze.”

The Government received 66 zienswijzen. Some resulted in changes to the ROPv.

The final ROPv became official in 2021. And yes, it addressed off-road vehicles.

The problem of motorized vehicles in Aruba’s natural areas was already being discussed while the ROPv was being prepared.

The Raad voor de Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling — the Spatial Development Council — even complained that regulation of off-road vehicles and enforcement had not received enough attention.

During the public consultation process, a proposal was also made to control the number of motorized vehicles using roads in natural areas. The Government agreed that a maximum number could be established and changed the ROPv as a result.

One important detail is that the ROPv does not simply say, “No motorized vehicles are allowed in nature.”

In areas classified as “Natuurgebied” and “Natuur en landschap” — nature reserves and nature and landscape areas — recreational motorized vehicles may travel on specifically designated roads during established hours.

So designated routes are very, very important.

And this is where Aruba’s problem becomes clear.

## What happened after 2021?

For years, Aruba has been talking about the ATV and UTV problem. The Government knew about it. Residents complained about dust and noise. There were concerns about accidents. Environmental organizations complained about damage to nature. Repeatedly, the Government itself acknowledged that regulation was necessary.

In 2021, the Government had a multidisciplinary commission — meaning experts from different fields — work on the issue. In 2022, the Government said it had begun working on alternative routes. In 2024, it announced another transition plan. By the beginning of 2025, three alternative routes were supposed to be designated, while speed and nuisance also needed to be regulated.

But by July 2025, Bon Dia Aruba was still asking what had happened to those plans. And in June 2026, the problem was still there.

No official off-road routes had been designated. Minister Arthur Dowers explained that the ROPv permits the use of motorized vehicles in certain areas, but first the Government must determine where those vehicles are allowed to travel and clearly mark those routes.

Crucially, Aruba had rules, plans, and warnings. But an important part of the system remained unfinished.

## ABC went to court

Aruba Birdlife Conservation argues that the Government has failed to enforce existing environmental protections. In other words, ABC did not go to the Government and create a new law. ABC’s argument is that rules already exist and the Government is not enforcing them.

The legal action pushed the issue into a much more urgent phase. The Government and ABC entered negotiations, and the Government began blocking access to parts of the north coast while the parties tried to resolve the dispute.

## What does Greg Peterson have to do with it?

This is the easiest part to explain. Peterson did not create the ROPv. Peterson cannot close a public road. ABC cannot order a minister to do something.

Peterson leads an environmental organization.

ABC believes the Government is not respecting or enforcing existing rules. So ABC exercised a right that every citizen and organization has in a democracy: it went to court.

The Government can argue that ABC is wrong. ABC can argue that the Government is wrong. If they cannot reach an agreement, an independent judge can resolve the legal dispute.

So the question is not why Peterson gets to decide what happens on Aruba’s north coast, because he does not. The real issue is whether ABC is legally correct when it argues that the Government has failed to comply with and enforce rules that already exist.

That is what is happening in court.

## Why are tour operators protesting?

Because the consequences for them are very real. Companies have been operating tours for years. They bought vehicles, hired employees, and built businesses around excursions that use these areas.

Now access is being taken away while the Government is still trying to find alternative routes.

The operators say they are willing to work with designated routes and clear rules, but they do not accept abrupt closures, and they say the Government has not communicated properly with them.

Their frustration is understandable. If the Government allows a situation to continue for years and then suddenly begins enforcing rules and restrictions, businesses and workers suffer.

But there is another important principle: allowing something to happen for years does not automatically make it legal. Just because the Government failed to act earlier does not mean the ROPv disappears.

## Democracy doesn’t begin when a road is closed

There is an important lesson here for all of us. People have the right to protest, businesses have the right to defend their interests, and citizens have the right to demand answers from ministers. But democracy is not only what happens when we are angry. It also happens when the Government publishes a lengthy document and asks people to read it. Democracy is public consultation, zienswijzen, policy discussions — and citizens asking questions before a decision begins affecting their daily lives.

The ROPv was publicly discussed in 2019. The ATV/UTV issue remained part of public discussion for years afterward.

The Government also bears responsibility, because rules cannot exist only on paper. The Government must explain, implement, and enforce rules consistently. If a transition is necessary, the Government must manage that transition instead of allowing uncertainty to continue for years.

But tour operators also have a responsibility to understand the rules governing the areas on which their businesses depend.

Environmental organizations have the right to challenge the Government, and when there is a legal disagreement, the Court also has a role.

Last week’s roundabout blockade may have made the situation look like a new crisis, but it isn’t.

Understanding the history of how we got here is the first step toward understanding why Aruba’s north coast was closed.

u/bostonaruban66 — 1 month ago

More parking, fewer bike lanes: City of Boston, T release new Blue Hill Avenue redesign

For years, residents and politicians have railed against the city of Boston’s plan to reconfigure Blue Hill Avenue and the impacts that proposed bus and bike lanes could wrought on the busy corridor through the heart of Black Boston.

Now city officials and the MBTA say they’ve funneled those concerns into a new design that preserves a controversial center-running bus lane, but significantly expands the portions of the boulevard with two traffic lanes on each side, while shrinking the amount of proposed bike lanes.

The new plan would dedicate more of the road to motor vehicle travel and parking between Grove Hall and Mattapan Square, effectively creating a more car-friendly design.

Mayor Michelle Wu billed the plan as a “generationally transformational” layout, with $163 million in improvements to public transit and other public works that she said the “worn and dated” thoroughfare desperately needs.

What it offers, Wu said, is “basically a full reconstruction that represents the biggest investment in this transportation corridor in decades.”

The redesign also includes what officials called beautification improvements all along Blue Hill Avenue, including newly repaved sidewalks, better street lighting, and 200 trees.

City officials and the T will host four public meetings on this proposal, starting Thursday through Sept. 30. They’re aiming to finalize the design by the end of 2027. Phased construction would begin the next year and last through 2030.

The layout marks the latest move to get the project underway since Boston first launched a redesign seven years ago, and there’s $95 million in federal funding on the line if it doesn’t move forward. The state, the city, and the T are committing another $64 million altogether.

The project has triggered immense scrutiny from neighborhood residents and businesses already frustrated by decades of neglect of the avenue, dating as far back to the 1950s when the streetcar trolley along it was eliminated. Another similar rapid bus transit project through the corridor died in 2009.

Earlier this year, Boston City Councilors Brian Worrell and Miniard Culpepper even recommended replacing the center-running bus lane with an extension of the Orange Line. The T vowed to study the option, but suggested refocusing on “immediate improvements.”

Some of those are laid out in the newest design.

Almost 11 of the existing 13.8 miles of roadway in either direction would be preserved for motor vehicles with two or more general-purpose traffic lanes. That’s far more than a previous design in which 60 percent of the road would have had two lanes in either direction.

Five blocks along Blue Hill Avenue would also be subject to rush-hour changes, during which parking lanes would transform into travel lanes during peak traffic times.

There are other special carveouts: The design proposes creating a separated “carriageway” near Franklin Park to make boarding buses easier, while a section in Grove Hall would have a designated zone for safe school pick-up and drop-off.

The new layout would increase the number of parking spaces to 717 from 675. Notably, the plan would cut the number of all-day parking spaces by 10, but offset those losses with 52 spots available outside of traffic-heavy windows.

Near the Morningstar Baptist Church, for example, cars would be allowed to park on the median on Sundays.

The bike lanes previously proposed in both directions along Blue Hill Avenue and through Mattapan Square are gone in the new plan. Instead, officials suggested creating a two-way separated bike path on the west side of the avenue between Franklin Park and Mattapan, and another from American Legion Highway to Woodlawn Street.

And the proposed improvements extend well beyond the roadway itself. The design includes plans for six miles of rebuilt sidewalks with accessible curb ramps and 19 new walk signals.

Altogether, the addition of the center-running bus lane and bus boarding platforms is expected to reduce travel times for 40,000 daily bus riders by 10 to 15 minutes. Car traffic would be faster in the proposed layout than the previous design, officials estimate.

State Representative Russell Holmes, whose district covers much of the corridor, said the design is proof officials have “changed everywhere that we can” in response to community feedback.

“Everybody has their desires, and no one gets everything they want,” the Mattapan Democrat said. “But this is about balancing bikes, bus riders, cars, walkers, and students. It’s about everybody.”

Kahlil Cooper, a program manager at the Mattapan Food and Fitness Coalition, said the new design prioritizes local bus riders, who make up about half the travelers on Blue Hill Avenue on any given day.

“The city was able to effectively listen to the community and change pieces that people had gripes about,” Cooper said. “But at what point do you put your foot down and say we cannot make any more changes because of timeline constraints? At what point does the discussion end?”

Diti Kohli can be reached at diti.kohli@globe.com. Follow her u/ditikohli_.

bostonglobe.com
u/bostonaruban66 — 1 month ago
▲ 273 r/LynnMA+1 crossposts

Cyclist dies after crash with pickup truck in Lynn

Sad day for bicyclists. Terrible headline.....Guess the truck moved itself and had no driver.

boston25news.com
u/Pr3ssAltF4 — 1 month ago
▲ 1.1k r/STNorthampton+3 crossposts

Tactical Urbanism: White Duct Tape creates protected bike lane intersection where Louisa was killed.

u/axlekb — 2 months ago

We Are Traffic: Boston Police tried to stop over 200 people riding bicycles at Critical Mass Boston.

u/bostonaruban66 — 2 months ago