MSc Advance Data science
DM if you are pursuing this course
DM if you are pursuing this course
DM if you are pursuing this course
Sparck AI scholars connect
DM if you wish to connect.
Sparck AI scholars connect
DM if you wish to connect.
Sparck AI scholars connect
DM if you wish to connect.
​
This year I applied for graduate school in the UK. I received scholarship-backed offers from both Newcastle University and the University of Southampton yesterday.
The two programmes are:
Newcastle University: MSc Advanced Data Science
https://www.ncl.ac.uk/postgraduate/degrees/5395f/
University of Southampton: MSc Data and Decision Analytics
https://www.southampton.ac.uk/courses/data-decision-analytics-masters-msc and it's by the math department.
My background, as you may remember, is in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from INDIA. I have a 4 years degree. I wish to pursue a PhD but sometimes I worry is 90 ECTS from a UK masters will be allowed in EU or US.
The reason I'm finding the decision difficult is that the two programmes are quite different academically. But in my opinion, are equally helpful for PhD. I'm not sure if I should look at university rankings, University of Southampton stands at 111 and Newcastle at 149. University of Southampton is on the CS ranking list whereas Newcastle isn't. I went over the faculty's paper and thought both were rigorous. Regarding coursework, I'm someone who studies on their own, so I'm not sure if I should consider teaching a major factor.
The Newcastle programme is housed within Computing and appears to be more focused on data science, machine learning, AI applications, data engineering, and related areas. My initial thinking was that this might align naturally with my current work and could provide a good foundation if I decide to pursue a PhD in AI or machine learning later. The Southampton programme, on the other hand, is offered through the Mathematics department and seems much stronger in statistics, optimisation, operational research, and decision science. I find these areas intellectually appealing as well and ofc helps for a PhD, so I don't have a strong preference purely from an academic-interest perspective. Both are in the domains of problems I want to work on.
I wanted to get an external perspective from someone who has seen academia and industry, I feel like I'm super new to graduate school applications or such information, I'm trying to make a data driven decision but I just wanted to consult.
If you were in my position, how would you think about this decision? In particular, I'd be interested in your thoughts regarding:
• Long-term research opportunities
• Preparation for a future PhD
• Technical depth and academic rigour in your opinion from the coursework
• Whether the overall reputation difference between Southampton and Newcastle is significant enough to influence the decision if I wish to do a PhD
I'm also wondering if I should be considering a PhD, I want to it by the end of my life 99%
I would be very grateful for any thoughts you may have.
Hey everyone! I'm an international student and I'm new to this, I'm looking for any advice regarding accommodation, I'll be pursuing my master's. Please let me know anything, I'm a clueless 1st generation student.
Thank you so much! Open to sharing too.
Hey everyone! I'm an international student and I'm new to this, I'm looking for any advice regarding accommodation, I'll be pursuing my master's. Please let me know anything, I'm a clueless 1st generation student.
Thank you so much!
Asking here because I get pretty great advice here.
\--
TL;DR: Recent graduate in an industry research role. Struggled on a difficult project outside my background, had some communication issues with my supervisor, and now feel anxious about my performance. I've been offered a funded master's program abroad (official paperwork pending) and may need to resign soon despite having a 90-day notice period, program starts in 2 months. Should I wait for the official offer before informing my manager, and how can I resign professionally without burning bridges?
\\-- FULL STORY --/
I'm a recent graduate working in an industry research role. When I joined, I was assigned to a project in an area where I had very little prior background. I informed my supervisor of this from the beginning and was told that it was okay and that I could learn as I worked on the project.
Over the past several months, I've been trying to make progress on a difficult research problem. I've spent a lot of time reading literature, implementing ideas, running experiments, and exploring different approaches, but progress has been slower than expected and I haven't produced the kind of results the team hoped for.
Along the way, there have been a few incidents that affected my confidence. Earlier this year, I left work early while unwell and had a disagreement with my supervisor about communication and expectations. There were also concerns raised about responsiveness and workplace habits. At one point I considered asking for a team transfer to the HR.
Later, I had a discussion with my supervisor who reassured me that learning takes time and that I should continue developing my skills. More recently, I directly asked my supervisor how I could improve because I had heard concerns about my performance. She told me that my progress was acceptable for someone at my experience level and encouraged me to continue learning.
Even so, I often feel anxious around my supervisor and worry about making mistakes. Small issues sometimes seem to escalate, and I feel like I'm constantly trying to avoid doing something wrong. I've been called out many times, even though I do the work?
At the same time, I've been applying to master's programs after these incidents. I have recently been informed that I've been selected for a funded master's opportunity abroad that I am very excited about. I'm still waiting for the official paperwork, but if everything goes through, I would likely leave my current job within the next few months.
The complication is that my employment contract has a 90-day notice period. I also have an upcoming meeting with my supervisor and manager to discuss the next phase of work, which is expected to span several months.
My questions are:
Should I participate normally in long-term planning discussions even though I may resign soon?
Should I wait until I receive the official admission paperwork before telling anyone?
How would you handle the 90-day notice period in this situation?
From an outside perspective, does this sound like underperformance on my part, or more like a mismatch between expectations, experience level, and management style?
What's the most professional way to resign without damaging relationships?
I'm looking for honest feedback, including criticism if you think I've mishandled parts of the situation.
Asking here because I get pretty great advice here.
--
TL;DR: Recent graduate in an industry research role. Struggled on a difficult project outside my background, had some communication issues with my supervisor, and now feel anxious about my performance. I've been offered a funded master's program abroad (official paperwork pending) and may need to resign soon despite having a 90-day notice period, program starts in 2 months. Should I wait for the official offer before informing my manager, and how can I resign professionally without burning bridges?
\-- FULL STORY --/
I'm a recent graduate working in an industry research role. When I joined, I was assigned to a project in an area where I had very little prior background. I informed my supervisor of this from the beginning and was told that it was okay and that I could learn as I worked on the project.
Over the past several months, I've been trying to make progress on a difficult research problem. I've spent a lot of time reading literature, implementing ideas, running experiments, and exploring different approaches, but progress has been slower than expected and I haven't produced the kind of results the team hoped for.
Along the way, there have been a few incidents that affected my confidence. Earlier this year, I left work early while unwell and had a disagreement with my supervisor about communication and expectations. There were also concerns raised about responsiveness and workplace habits. At one point I considered asking for a team transfer to the HR.
Later, I had a discussion with my supervisor who reassured me that learning takes time and that I should continue developing my skills. More recently, I directly asked my supervisor how I could improve because I had heard concerns about my performance. She told me that my progress was acceptable for someone at my experience level and encouraged me to continue learning.
Even so, I often feel anxious around my supervisor and worry about making mistakes. Small issues sometimes seem to escalate, and I feel like I'm constantly trying to avoid doing something wrong. I've been called out many times, even though I do the work?
At the same time, I've been applying to master's programs after these incidents. I have recently been informed that I've been selected for a funded master's opportunity abroad that I am very excited about. I'm still waiting for the official paperwork, but if everything goes through, I would likely leave my current job within the next few months.
The complication is that my employment contract has a 90-day notice period. I also have an upcoming meeting with my supervisor and manager to discuss the next phase of work, which is expected to span several months.
My questions are:
Should I participate normally in long-term planning discussions even though I may resign soon?
Should I wait until I receive the official admission paperwork before telling anyone?
How would you handle the 90-day notice period in this situation?
From an outside perspective, does this sound like underperformance on my part, or more like a mismatch between expectations, experience level, and management style?
What's the most professional way to resign without damaging relationships?
I'm looking for honest feedback, including criticism if you think I've mishandled parts of the situation.
​
I'm 23F and I've never been on a date, been in a relationship, or even had someone ask me out in real life.
Academically and professionally, my life is going pretty well. I was always a class topper, graduated with good grades, and now work in tech. I plan to do a PhD soon. . I have hobbies, friends, and a stable job. I've recently moved to a new city and am trying to build a life outside of work.
The thing I've struggled with my entire life is my weight.
I'm around 165 cm (5'5") and about 90 kg. I've been overweight since childhood. Despite that, I'm fairly active. I do athletics (shot put and discus) and swim regularly, usually 4+ times a week. Since starting my new job, I've gained some weight, and although I've been trying to lose it, progress has been slow. Overall, people tell me that I'm funny, smart and empathetic.
I don't think I'm unhappy with every aspect of my life, but I do feel uncomfortable in my body. Sometimes I feel like dating is something I'll only be allowed to do after I lose a significant amount of weight.
I've attached photos because I'd rather get honest feedback than vague encouragement.
Would you genuinely consider dating someone with my body type if you liked her personality, values, and lifestyle?
Is my weight likely to be a deal breaker for most men, or only for some men?
Based on these photos, what is the first impression I give off?
Do I come across as approachable and feminine, or do I seem guarded, awkward, or uncomfortable?
If your goal was to make me more attractive to the average man, what would you suggest I focus on first?
Apart from weight loss, what changes would have the biggest impact? Fitness? Posture? Confidence? Social skills?
Am I overestimating how much men care about weight compared to things like personality, warmth, confidence, intelligence, and compatibility?
If you were helping a younger sister, friend, or daughter in my position who had never dated before, what advice would you give her?
Does being 23 and never having dated come across as a red flag, or is it more common than I think?
Most importantly, am I holding myself back by waiting until I'm thinner before putting myself out there?
I'm not looking for validation or for people to tell me I'm perfect. I know I have things I can improve, and I'm already working on my health.
I'm genuinely trying to understand how men see someone like me, what I can realistically improve, and whether I've spent too many years assuming that nobody would be interested in me until I reached a certain number on the scale.
Please be honest. I'd rather hear constructive advice than empty reassurance. Photos
One thing that probably contributes to my anxiety around dating is that I didn't grow up with a healthy example of a relationship. My father was mostly absent, and I was raised by my mother, who worked extremely hard and was often busy trying to keep everything together. When my father was around, I saw him scream at my mother and sometimes become physically aggressive. He also made it clear that he was disappointed in me.
As a result, I've spent most of my life focusing on academics, sports, and building a career rather than dating. I think part of me is afraid of ending up in an unhealthy relationship, and another part assumes that nobody would be interested in me anyway.
For those of you who grew up without healthy relationship role models, how did you learn to trust people and approach dating in a healthy way?
TL;DR: Recent graduate in an industry research role. Struggled on a difficult project outside my background, had some communication issues with my supervisor, and now feel anxious about my performance. I've been offered a funded master's program abroad (official paperwork pending) and may need to resign soon despite having a 90-day notice period. Should I wait for the official offer before informing my manager, and how can I resign professionally without burning bridges?
--
I'm a recent graduate working in an industry research role. When I joined, I was assigned to a project in an area where I had very little prior background. I informed my supervisor of this from the beginning and was told that it was okay and that I could learn as I worked on the project.
Over the past several months, I've been trying to make progress on a difficult research problem. I've spent a lot of time reading literature, implementing ideas, running experiments, and exploring different approaches, but progress has been slower than expected and I haven't produced the kind of results the team hoped for.
Along the way, there have been a few incidents that affected my confidence. Earlier this year, I left work early while unwell and had a disagreement with my supervisor about communication and expectations. There were also concerns raised about responsiveness and workplace habits. At one point I considered asking for a team transfer.
Later, I had a discussion with my manager, who reassured me that learning takes time and that I should continue developing my skills. More recently, I directly asked my supervisor how I could improve because I had heard concerns about my performance. She told me that my progress was acceptable for someone at my experience level and encouraged me to continue learning.
Even so, I often feel anxious around my supervisor and worry about making mistakes. Small issues sometimes seem to escalate, and I feel like I'm constantly trying to avoid doing something wrong.
At the same time, I've been applying to master's programs. I have recently been informed that I've been selected for a funded master's opportunity abroad that I am very excited about. I'm still waiting for the official paperwork, but if everything goes through, I would likely leave my current job within the next few months.
The complication is that my employment contract has a 90-day notice period. I also have an upcoming meeting with my supervisor and manager to discuss the next phase of work, which is expected to span several months.
My questions are:
Should I participate normally in long-term planning discussions even though I may resign soon?
Should I wait until I receive the official admission paperwork before telling anyone?
How would you handle the 90-day notice period in this situation?
From an outside perspective, does this sound like underperformance on my part, or more like a mismatch between expectations, experience level, and management style?
What's the most professional way to resign without damaging relationships?
I'm looking for honest feedback, including criticism if you think I've mishandled parts of the situation.
TL;DR: Recent graduate in an industry research role. Struggled on a difficult project outside my background, had some communication issues with my supervisor, and now feel anxious about my performance. I've been offered a funded master's program abroad (official paperwork pending) and may need to resign soon despite having a 90-day notice period. Should I wait for the official offer before informing my manager, and how can I resign professionally without burning bridges?
--
I'm a recent graduate working in an industry research role. When I joined, I was assigned to a project in an area where I had very little prior background. I informed my supervisor of this from the beginning and was told that it was okay and that I could learn as I worked on the project.
Over the past several months, I've been trying to make progress on a difficult research problem. I've spent a lot of time reading literature, implementing ideas, running experiments, and exploring different approaches, but progress has been slower than expected and I haven't produced the kind of results the team hoped for.
Along the way, there have been a few incidents that affected my confidence. Earlier this year, I left work early while unwell and had a disagreement with my supervisor about communication and expectations. There were also concerns raised about responsiveness and workplace habits. At one point I considered asking for a team transfer.
Later, I had a discussion with my manager, who reassured me that learning takes time and that I should continue developing my skills. More recently, I directly asked my supervisor how I could improve because I had heard concerns about my performance. She told me that my progress was acceptable for someone at my experience level and encouraged me to continue learning.
Even so, I often feel anxious around my supervisor and worry about making mistakes. Small issues sometimes seem to escalate, and I feel like I'm constantly trying to avoid doing something wrong.
At the same time, I've been applying to master's programs. I have recently been informed that I've been selected for a funded master's opportunity abroad that I am very excited about. I'm still waiting for the official paperwork, but if everything goes through, I would likely leave my current job within the next few months.
The complication is that my employment contract has a 90-day notice period. I also have an upcoming meeting with my supervisor and manager to discuss the next phase of work, which is expected to span several months.
My questions are:
Should I participate normally in long-term planning discussions even though I may resign soon?
Should I wait until I receive the official admission paperwork before telling anyone?
How would you handle the 90-day notice period in this situation?
From an outside perspective, does this sound like underperformance on my part, or more like a mismatch between expectations, experience level, and management style?
What's the most professional way to resign without damaging relationships?
I'm looking for honest feedback, including criticism if you think I've mishandled parts of the situation.
TL;DR: Recent graduate in an industry research role. Struggled on a difficult project outside my background, had some communication issues with my supervisor, and now feel anxious about my performance. I've been offered a funded master's program abroad (official paperwork pending) and may need to resign soon despite having a 90-day notice period. Should I wait for the official offer before informing my manager, and how can I resign professionally without burning bridges?
--
I'm a recent graduate working in an industry research role. When I joined, I was assigned to a project in an area where I had very little prior background. I informed my supervisor of this from the beginning and was told that it was okay and that I could learn as I worked on the project.
Over the past several months, I've been trying to make progress on a difficult research problem. I've spent a lot of time reading literature, implementing ideas, running experiments, and exploring different approaches, but progress has been slower than expected and I haven't produced the kind of results the team hoped for.
Along the way, there have been a few incidents that affected my confidence. Earlier this year, I left work early while unwell and had a disagreement with my supervisor about communication and expectations. There were also concerns raised about responsiveness and workplace habits. At one point I considered asking for a team transfer.
Later, I had a discussion with my manager, who reassured me that learning takes time and that I should continue developing my skills. More recently, I directly asked my supervisor how I could improve because I had heard concerns about my performance. She told me that my progress was acceptable for someone at my experience level and encouraged me to continue learning.
Even so, I often feel anxious around my supervisor and worry about making mistakes. Small issues sometimes seem to escalate, and I feel like I'm constantly trying to avoid doing something wrong.
At the same time, I've been applying to master's programs. I have recently been informed that I've been selected for a funded master's opportunity abroad that I am very excited about. I'm still waiting for the official paperwork, but if everything goes through, I would likely leave my current job within the next few months.
The complication is that my employment contract has a 90-day notice period. I also have an upcoming meeting with my supervisor and manager to discuss the next phase of work, which is expected to span several months.
My questions are:
Should I participate normally in long-term planning discussions even though I may resign soon?
Should I wait until I receive the official admission paperwork before telling anyone?
How would you handle the 90-day notice period in this situation?
From an outside perspective, does this sound like underperformance on my part, or more like a mismatch between expectations, experience level, and management style?
What's the most professional way to resign without damaging relationships?
I'm looking for honest feedback, including criticism if you think I've mishandled parts of the situation.
TLDR
Dating a guy online for 2 months. Got a masters. No reply for 3 days. Was supposed to meet today.
Follow up, or take the silence as my answer?
---
Confused
I (23 F) met a guy online about 2 months ago. We talked regularly, got along really well, and I eventually told him I liked him. A few weeks later, he asked me to be his girlfriend and I said yes. I have never dated and we both have full time jobs.
Throughout this time, we had never actually met in person due to scheduling issues on both sides, but we were finally supposed to meet this weekend. But we did do a lot of video calls.
The complication is that I've been applying for master's programs abroad. He knew this was a possibility, but neither of us knew what would happen. A few days ago, I unexpectedly received a full scholarship for a master's program starting this year.
When I told him, we had a conversation about the future. He said he doesn't really believe in long-distance relationships, especially since we may never end up in the same country. He also said he doesn't want me to feel tied down by him. I never thought that way.
I told him I understood and that communication is what matters to me. He then asked whether I still wanted to continue dating, and I said yes.
After that, I asked whether he still wanted to meet this weekend as originally planned. He never answered that question. It's now been 2–3 days with no response.
I genuinely respect whatever decision he makes. If he doesn't want to meet because he thinks it will make things harder emotionally, I can understand that. What is bothering me is the uncertainty and silence.
Part of me thinks he's taking time to process everything. Another part of me wonders whether the silence is already an answer.
Would you send a follow-up message asking directly whether he still wants to meet, or would you leave it alone and wait? How would you interpret this situation?
Also, am I being unreasonable for feeling hurt by the lack of response, even though the scholarship news changed the circumstances so suddenly?
​
I (23 F) met a guy online about 2 months ago. We talked regularly, got along really well, and I eventually told him I liked him. A few weeks later, he asked me to be his girlfriend and I said yes. I have never dated and we both have full time jobs.
Throughout this time, we had never actually met in person due to scheduling issues on both sides, but we were finally supposed to meet this weekend. But we did do a lot of video calls.
The complication is that I've been applying for master's programs abroad. He knew this was a possibility, but neither of us knew what would happen. A few days ago, I unexpectedly received a full scholarship for a master's program starting this year.
When I told him, we had a conversation about the future. He said he doesn't really believe in long-distance relationships, especially since we may never end up in the same country. He also said he doesn't want me to feel tied down by him. I never thought that way.
I told him I understood and that communication is what matters to me. He then asked whether I still wanted to continue dating, and I said yes.
After that, I asked whether he still wanted to meet this weekend as originally planned. He never answered that question. It's now been 2–3 days with no response.
I genuinely respect whatever decision he makes. If he doesn't want to meet because he thinks it will make things harder emotionally, I can understand that. What is bothering me is the uncertainty and silence.
Part of me thinks he's taking time to process everything. Another part of me wonders whether the silence is already an answer.
Would you send a follow-up message asking directly whether he still wants to meet, or would you leave it alone and wait? How would you interpret this situation?Also, am I being unreasonable for feeling hurt by the lack of response, even though the scholarship news changed the circumstances so suddenly?
I (23 F) met a guy online about 2 months ago. We talked regularly, got along really well, and I eventually told him I liked him. A few weeks later, he asked me to be his girlfriend and I said yes. I have never dated and we both have full time jobs.
Throughout this time, we had never actually met in person due to scheduling issues on both sides, but we were finally supposed to meet this weekend. But we did do a lot of video calls.
The complication is that I've been applying for master's programs abroad. He knew this was a possibility, but neither of us knew what would happen. A few days ago, I unexpectedly received a full scholarship for a master's program starting this year.
When I told him, we had a conversation about the future. He said he doesn't really believe in long-distance relationships, especially since we may never end up in the same country. He also said he doesn't want me to feel tied down by him. I never thought that way.
I told him I understood and that communication is what matters to me. He then asked whether I still wanted to continue dating, and I said yes.
After that, I asked whether he still wanted to meet this weekend as originally planned. He never answered that question. It's now been 2–3 days with no response.
I genuinely respect whatever decision he makes. If he doesn't want to meet because he thinks it will make things harder emotionally, I can understand that. What is bothering me is the uncertainty and silence.
Part of me thinks he's taking time to process everything. Another part of me wonders whether the silence is already an answer.
Would you send a follow-up message asking directly whether he still wants to meet, or would you leave it alone and wait? How would you interpret this situation?
Also, am I being unreasonable for feeling hurt by the lack of response, even though the scholarship news changed the circumstances so suddenly?
Hello hello!
Sparck AI scholars, comment or DM if you got the scholarship :)
4-week update: acne stopped, but the marks are not fading. Need advice on next steps\*\*
About a month ago I posted here because my acne suddenly exploded after starting a new job. Before Oct 2025, I had basically clear skin my entire life. Then within a few months I started waking up with multiple painful pimples every day, especially inflamed ones that left dark marks immediately.
Quick update after \~4 weeks:
I started using Adapalene + Clindamycin gel (Leeford Alight Plus Gel) consistently at night, and the good news is:
\* active acne has reduced \*a lot\*
\* I am no longer getting 4–5 new painful pimples every morning
\* inflammation is much calmer overall
So something is finally working.
But the problem now is the marks. My face still looks bad because of all the dark post-acne spots. The acne itself has mostly slowed down, but the pigmentation is staying and it feels extremely slow to fade.
Current routine:
\* Night: Alight Plus Gel (adapalene + clindamycin)
\* Face wash: Olay Regenerist Revitalising Cream Cleanser
\* Moisturiser: Pond’s Super Light Gel
\* Sunscreen: Derma Co 1% Hyaluronic Sunscreen Aqua Gel SPF50
\* I also started swimming regularly recently
A few questions:
Is this normal progress for 4 weeks on adapalene/clindamycin?
How long did post-acne marks take to fade for you?
Could swimming pool chlorine be making pigmentation or irritation worse?
Should I continue the antibiotic gel long-term, or switch to plain adapalene later?
Is there anything evidence-based that actually helps PIH marks fade faster without destroying the skin barrier?
Honestly, the active acne improving has helped mentally, but the marks are still affecting my confidence a lot. Curious if anyone else had sudden stress/job-triggered acne that eventually stabilised.
4-week update: acne stopped, but the marks are not fading. Need advice on next steps**
About a month ago I posted here because my acne suddenly exploded after starting a new job. Before Oct 2025, I had basically clear skin my entire life. Then within a few months I started waking up with multiple painful pimples every day, especially inflamed ones that left dark marks immediately.
Quick update after ~4 weeks:
I started using Adapalene + Clindamycin gel (Leeford Alight Plus Gel) consistently at night, and the good news is:
* active acne has reduced *a lot*
* I am no longer getting 4–5 new painful pimples every morning
* inflammation is much calmer overall
So something is finally working.
But the problem now is the marks. My face still looks bad because of all the dark post-acne spots. The acne itself has mostly slowed down, but the pigmentation is staying and it feels extremely slow to fade.
Current routine:
* Night: Alight Plus Gel (adapalene + clindamycin)
* Face wash: Olay Regenerist Revitalising Cream Cleanser
* Moisturiser: Pond’s Super Light Gel
* Sunscreen: Derma Co 1% Hyaluronic Sunscreen Aqua Gel SPF50
* I also started swimming regularly recently
A few questions:
Is this normal progress for 4 weeks on adapalene/clindamycin?
How long did post-acne marks take to fade for you?
Could swimming pool chlorine be making pigmentation or irritation worse?
Should I continue the antibiotic gel long-term, or switch to plain adapalene later?
Is there anything evidence-based that actually helps PIH marks fade faster without destroying the skin barrier?
Honestly, the active acne improving has helped mentally, but the marks are still affecting my confidence a lot. Curious if anyone else had sudden stress/job-triggered acne that eventually stabilised.