u/ordinaryme99

As someone who is fascinated both by death and nature, I really love this concept.

https://livinglegacyforest.com/

https://preview.redd.it/9jygo208t01h1.jpg?width=311&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=038f90879f6ed4b4e696e71d02bdaaf44c8ae22a

I had this doll for quite some time. The head is original and marked 3/0, the body is a replacement (fully poseable), the wig is a wig I had (not original).

The marking 3/0 was used by more than one company and it only indicated the size, so I am not sure who made the head.

Any idea? Thanks!

I am thinking of buying a Kobo e-reader soon (probably in the next 10 days).

I have a Dell laptop that came with a PN350M-BK stylus. It does use MPP, but it's 1.51. Has anybody had any luck with it or do you know if it will work?

Thank you!

https://preview.redd.it/n5d2xzs4uqzg1.jpg?width=575&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5939db23614847e324cfb53212e6df6dec2edc3f

They probably don't care about what we think, but let's tell them anyway:

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/meta.com

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.facebook.com

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/instagram.com

So, many accounts are disabled without a valid reason, only because their Meta AI is not advanced or smart enough to distinguish between real violations and false positives. After being insulted by their system, the only way to get support is to PAY for Meta Verified. I refuse to do so out of principle. I did nothing wrong and won't pay to get support.

Support should be free for all users, even more so if it is THEIR fault if an account has been unfairly flagged.

Can they really force people to pay to get support when it is their fault and they should actually apologize and possibly even offer compensation if users had a business and have lost money? And could they be trying to get more people to pay for Meta Verified? Could all be intentional?

There are other huge companies, like eBay, and they all offer support for free, even if they also have eBay Plus, but they still assist customers.

AI Overview also says this (yeah, AI again, but they get it right better than Meta...):

AI Overview

Based on numerous reports, investigations, and legal actions as of early 2026, Meta (the parent company of Facebook and Instagram) is facing intense scrutiny and allegations that its platforms profit significantly from scam ads and fraudulent activities.

Leaked documents and investigations suggest a substantial portion of Meta's revenue, estimated in 2024 to be around $16 billion (roughly 10% of revenue), came from ads for banned subject matter, including adult content, illegal gambling, and scam products.

Key points regarding these allegations include:

Profiting from Scams: Reports indicate Meta has allowed high-risk scam ads to appear on its platforms, sometimes despite them being reported, because they are a significant source of advertising revenue.

Failed Enforcement: Internal documents suggest that Meta has sometimes dissolved or reduced the effectiveness of anti-fraud teams to maintain revenue growth, particularly regarding ads from certain regions.

Imposter and Fraudulent Ads: Scammers frequently use celebrity endorsements and fake brands to lure users into investing in fake cryptocurrency schemes or purchasing bogus products, with thousands of these ads appearing daily.

Resisting Regulation: Meta has been accused of resisting universal advertiser verification measures that could cost the company billions in revenue, even though such measures could significantly reduce fraudulent content.

Response from Meta: Meta has publicly stated they work to protect users, have removed millions of scam ads and accounts, and are partnering with law enforcement to tackle scammers. However, critics, regulators, and users argue these efforts are inadequate given the scale of the problem.

While not a "scam" in the traditional sense of a singular fraudulent scheme, the allegations suggest that Meta’s business model and lax advertising enforcement have created an environment where they profit from users being scammed.