I mean ... they had established actors, costumes, and sets in storage.
No reason they could not have had Chekov or Uhura in a time travel story, or Riker or Tuvok or Seven of Nine or Bashir and Dax.
What was the point of having a war across time without actually doing it in a way that integrated more of Star Trek?
So I just ordered this for lunch and I could not believe it was real so I took a picture; is this lunch I just ate AI?
I spend a lot of time talking about the law in a legal subreddit, where my flair specifically says not to DM me. Despite that, people message me constantly, which I ignore and it's not a big deal.
But yesterday, someone used a thread about Star Trek costumes to bug me for a DM about a legal issue.
I feel like that crosses a line. Am I overreacting?
[supprimé]
^(I'm a bit high, bear with me ...)
Just saw a reel of Alex Ross's reference sculptures, and how he made them and how much they look like his paintings.
So a stop-motion animated version of Kingdom Come, with figures sculpted by Alex Ross himself and backgrounds painted by him.
The powerset would have been similar but actually more comical, which would have worked well for the show.
Since they wrote him to be a disgraced police detective turned PI, the idea of him being a cop became rather irrelevant. Now if he had been an ex-criminal, as Plastic Man, his redemption arc would have been much steeper.
I just feel like Plastic Man would have fit the overall vibe better.
I have two Echo Flex devices that suddenly have:
They both started acting weird at the same time, so that's suspicious.
Yes, these are the ones that sit on the outlet and have an aux out to get decent sound.
Anyone have any info on why both stopped working at the same time? Unplugging them and plugging them back in did nothing.
The suede loafers look perfect for sockless wear, but I've found I have to return online shoes 2-3 times to get a proper fit.
Anyone try them yet? Got return experience?
>^(... because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know. ...)
-- Donald Rumsfeld, 2002
Historically, it's been relatively easy to rebuild after bankruptcy because the FICO score has been a "snapshot" of what has been true at the moment you check.
However, it looks like FICO10t is coming, and while we may know what it will do generally, we don't know what it will look like for bankruptcy, because FICO10 is going to be using TRENDED DATA in a way prior FICO scores have not used.
So it's probably going to take longer to rebuild, as they will be considering not just how long you've had credit, but what your monthly pattern is on how much you charge. Single-month high utilization will probably have an impact greater than that single month. And who knows how long you'll have to have new credit for it to really build your score.
At this point, the impacts are unknown, and since there won't be a guide we won't know how this will impact post-bankruptcy rebuilding until it's been in place for a year or two.
