u/DJGammaRabbit

The interview: Thomas Jane comes out as an experiencer on Area 52 podcast. He will be hosting our livestream Reddit AMA with the Anomalous Coalition event answering your reddit questions this Sunday (details in the post) : r/UFOB

A report I found: I WAS BEING WATCHED. In 1961, six-year-old Joyce Halfin was in her bedroom in Ottawa, Canada when she saw strange figures by her window. Suddenly she flew up in the sky over her house. She blacked out and assumed it must have been a crazy dream. But she knew it wasn’t and as she grew up, more encounters occurred. Curious, she tried hypnosis, and learned that in 1961, she was taken onboard by praying mantis-type ETs and physically examined. Later, she was taken again, and they told her how they pilot their craft and other spiritual information.

At 46:30 to 47:30, he talks about Joyce Halfins' experience.

This one is interesting to me because I'm near Ottawa, Canada. I have reached out to her for comment.

In the interview Thomas talks about what the Mantis told Joyce: that their ship is a "light ship." That our space program is doomed to fail. That we would figure out how to travel between dimensions using light - but it's the same light at the "end of the tunnel," when we die or have an NDE. "We use that to travel, and you're going to learn how to do that without dying."

Sounds very complicated. You mean the tunnel of light that I only see when I'm fucking dying - and somehow we bring ships into that space. We take tangible matter and bring it into a field of consciousness - or - we re-create these ships in a consciousness-based arena. The idea of physical locale goes out the window.

It sounds like... teleportation, not space travel. It sounds like "if you teleport your consciousness using the light tunnel the physical stuff [around you?] comes with you." Whether they're coming here in 3D, I don't know, but it's probable.

Do you realize the implications of that?

That means reality is flipped on its head. This would also mean the potentiality of being a master over matter is high. You could probably create matter at that point... or destroy it. You could go anywhere and do anything you could think of.

That means they know your consciousness. That means they know you as a person. They know your spiritual "plan" for this life.

That means our minds create reality... sort of. How exactly do you take a physical ship and shove it into a "light tunnel" that has no mass?

That means that these ships are "catching rides" like surfers on a wave - that it's transporting your consciousness, not your physical being, maybe.

This might mean that all E.T. are not here physically - but are existing inside of your own mental space. Read that again! Not to freak anyone out, but have you seen the movie Smile? That's the only thing that I could think of - an entity existing inside of or inside the bounds of your own consciousness. It would explain quite a few things - why some see these and why most don't - why there's usually a dreamy aspect to abductions and interactions. It would mean there's another reality to explore, one as vast as, if not more vast, than the physical.

That means "the light" is a tangible thing at least at a consciousness level.

That means, possibly, that these E.T. are actually from a more-so mental-arena than a physical one. What that could mean is that one person could see an E.T. while another standing beside them doesn't. It could mean that our entire interaction with E.T. is a spiritual one, one that transcends physicality at a consciousness level instead of a physical level.

If they know your life plan, they know it's what you want, so they're unlikely to interfere - making this a sort of undisclosed prison without bars. Not in the sense that some entity has put us here, but you've put you here, and they're respecting that.

There's a lot of things that can supposed from being told that they're using "the light tunnel" to travel. It would mean you could time-travel too. There's so much here to unpack from that small statement if this is true. If I found the right Joyce Halfin she has her own talk show under the name Joyce Aldrich.

I'm putting this here because it's Canada-specific, but I'm not going into what here is Canadian sourced except for hamburger. I'm looking for cheap food. I can't just ask this in a non-Canadian specific group or I'll get "go to aldi's," etc.

I'm on ODSP and my spouse works part time. I think we're all feeling a massive pinch in grocery costs that have had you shifting meal ideas. I haven't had a steak in years and I think I've been pretty solid at not over-spending but our monthly grocery bill has been upwards of $1000+. I mainly stick to bacon and eggs, frozen fruit and veg, but I've always left a few things out because I just didn't think they were healthy, like oatmeal.

I found a few years ago that hamburger from giant tiger (giant value) is both cheaper and fluffier, but their chicken is nasty and doesn't look like chicken at all. Hamburger from other places like Sobey's usually has bones in it and is up to 30% more expensive. GT brand is $10 a pack of 3 cylinders, IIRC they're 343 or 434 grams each. They recently raised the price up to $12 and then put it back down to $10. I can't find cheaper hamburger. This has been a staple for protein along with eggs and sardines. Sometimes this is a product of Canada, sometimes it isn't. That's about as far as I can participate in buying Canadian; if it's cheap I must buy that, but I'll buy Canadian if given the choice. I'm mostly sticking to No Frills' no name.

I tried to do a carnivore diet on hamburger and eggs, pork and bacon; not sustainable. I ran out of food half way through the month last month, partly because I spent a whopping $120 on beef brisket - it was cheaper to import beef all the way from Australia than to buy our own. The fuck.

So I've switched to the cheapest core of meals I can possibly buy: rice, potatoes, pasta, beans and oats, and they've made a meaningful dent in my grocery bill already. I've been attempting to avoid high carbs for a long time, but when sticking to natural carbs I'm not seeing a difference in hunger, and boiled potatoes are highest on the satiety list.

No Frills:

bag of white russet $4, $3 on sale
large flake oats $3
frozen fruit $15 2kg
Pasta: $3 gluten free
frozen peas/carrots/corn $5 2kg
eggs $10 for 30
milk powder $35 2.5kg
beans $1.50
canned tomatoes $2
Greek yogurt $7, so versatile
pre-pack coleslaw salad $3
hamburger $10
rotisserie chicken from sobeys $12-$13

The only things I was already regularly buying there were eggs and hamburger. Even broccoli has become too expensive, I've seen it at $5 a head.

I can do a lot with this. This will allow me to regularly make things that I actually enjoy eating:

chicken fried rice

shepherds pie

2-egg sandwiches

chili

baked potatoes with bacon, cheese, yogurt

oatmeal with fruit

alfredo pasta (milk powder + cream + butter)

"keto crack" - coleslaw x hamburger x soy/honey/garlic sauce

hamburger stew

Is there some recipe that I'm missing that would include beans, oats, pasta, rice or potatoes? Yesterday I made freakin' mozza stuffed fried mashed potato balls and it made me wonder why I wasn't just regularly buying bags of potatoes when they're so cheap per the weight. I might try a potato and egg hash. I fear that buying Canadian-only will just be more expensive. Something I've been doing lately is putting maple-bacon seasoning and smoked paprika and onion powder in greek yogurt for a carrot dip, it basically makes a smoky bacon dip.