u/MengShuZ

Not insinuating that they should or shouldn't have been executed, there's pros and cons to both sides. Since the White Lotus is seemingly influenced by Aang's principles, could it be that they were against executing the Red Lotus members because of his moral stance against murder?

For all I know, it may have not even crossed their minds, but I doubt that. For how dangerous the Red Lotus members were, I'm sure that this discussion would have come up. Tenzin and Katara and Sokka (if he wasn't dead by the time) could have been ones to argue against it. While Tarlok would have been less compelled, he'd likely trust them to decide on what is right.

I hope that this gets addressed some day in some media form.

Ever wondered where this idea might have stemmed from? The only way to find out for sure would be for a previous Avatar to have actually died while in the state. If not, then the idea should be considered speculative.

What I think might be the case, though, is that if an Avatar dies while in the AS, it might just delay the next reincarnation for a long time as Raava's spirit heals/regenerates. This could have happened at some point in the past with a previous Avatar, and the information just becoming misconstrued over time. Even if that's the case, though, that’s not to say the damage wouldn’t be catastrophic, as a lot can happen over centuries without an Avatar, just look at the Hundred Year War as an example.

And this might be what happened in Seven Havens. The narrator, likely Jae, talks as if it’s been centuries since Korra’s time and the beginning of the cataclysm. So maybe Korra actually died while in the state.

Could be wrong! Maybe the origins of this idea will be explained someday. Would love to hear your thoughts.

Hello. I made this custom Olimar design for a hypothetical Smash game that would have come out on the Nintendo DS in the year 2005, and also for a potential Pikmin game that would have released in 2007. It's a bit high poly but I will be making a low poly version sometime soon like I do with all of my models.

My netflix subscription ran out right in the middle of Team Avatar arguing... kicked me out... now I don't get to find out what happens next. I guess that's it... Team Avatar broke up and the Fire Nation wins and Appa stays locked up.

But at least Iroh kept his tea shop : D

My netflix subscription ran out right in the middle of Team Avatar arguing... kicked me out... now I don't get to find out what happens next. I guess that's it... Team Avatar broke up and the Fire Nation wins and Appa stays locked up.

But at least Iroh kept his tea shop : D

And basically it's just the version of OoT that took place in the Fallen Timeline.

A parody of the Avengers: Doomsday Announcement trailer from last year.

This is a weird premise I admit and you're probably confused on what I mean exactly so I'll try to explain it as best I can. I recently watched Batman and Robin for the first time, and understood why George Clooney portrayed Bruce at the of The Flash (2023), Up until now, I had no idea that he had in fact played the character before, and didn't understand the reference.

Is this supposed to be the same Bruce from the 1997 film which is in the same continuity as the original Batman film series?

Basically, I'm suggesting that reason why Bruce looks different throughout those four films is because of time travel shennanigans. That would basically suggest that the Bruce that we see the end of The Flash (2023) is the same Bruce from those films, only older since it'd be a few decades later.

So in the movie, Barry meets Keaton's Bruce/Batman, then at the end he fixes the timeline, and now Bruce/Batman looks like Clooney. So now basically Barry lives in the same timeline as the original Batman films, that's the gist.

Source: Smosh

Disclaimer, this is just fun speculation.

That being said, I think that we can all agree that the use of time travel tends to get kind of broken. So, I thought up a little fan-theory as to how it could work without contradictions. Could also work for other series as well.

Basically, time travel isn't really time travel, it's more so closer to interdimensional travel.

So let's say you travel to the year 2006 (20 years ago), you're not actually going back to 2006, but travelling to a universe where it is currently 2006.

Basically there are infinite universes, where every possible outcome and event is already mapped out. So in this example, you'd be going to a universe set in the past where you happened to pop up at that same time.

When you return to your present (back to 2026), you're just hopping into a universe where those changes already took place, one where you might have also decided to time travel during that time, so you'd be taking the place of that universe's version of you.

If that's the case, then your old universe, that one where you originally came from also still exists. So in the Arrowverse itself, at least before the events of crisis, there are universes where the Flash travelled back in time and didn't come back.

It follows the logic that past, present, and future, all exist at the same time. Sort of like how it's depicted in Spiderverse, where there is a universe set in 2018, the 1940s, the 31st century, and 2099, but they all exist simultaneously.

That's also why when the Flash goes to the future, he can exist at the same time as his future self, which is in reality, just an older, alternate version of himself.

One last thing, when a character hops into a universe set in the past, they're not creating a new universe, they're going into an already existing one, since there are infinite universes set throughout different times.

There might be a few holes, and I'm sorry if you disagree, but I just wanted to share this. It's fun to try and make sense of things, but please don't it too seriously.