A new analysis of 6,239 children—3,825 of them never vaccinated—just reported that kids who got even one shot before 13 months had massively higher odds of the infections and chronic-coded problems that now define childhood.
Not a rounding error.
Not “a slight bump.”
According to the Children’s Health Defense preprint:
• Recurrent strep: 130% higher odds
• Recurrent ear infections: 100% higher
• Rhinitis: 80% higher
• Recurrent respiratory disease: 60% higher
And it got worse with more shots.
Strep showed a dose-response: up to 240% higher odds in kids who received 6–9 doses versus unvaccinated kids.
Vaccinated girls had 160% higher odds of strep than unvaccinated girls—the strongest sex-split finding in the paper.
Developmental delay wasn’t up in the whole vaccinated group, but jumped 40% in the kids slammed with 10+ doses.
CHD’s Brian Hooker, a co-author: children were “60% more likely to suffer recurrent respiratory disease with at least double the risk of recurrent ear and strep infections.”
Risk rose with the number of vaccines.
This is the part institutions hate saying out loud: the CDC schedule packs at least 18 doses into that first year.
This paper looked at kids who got ANY of that versus kids who got NONE.
This comparison almost never gets funded.
Recurrent strep means antibiotics on repeat.
Ear infections mean tubes, specialists, more drugs.
Recurrent respiratory disease means a childhood spent sick.
The authors argue that pattern looks like immune disruption, not “just coincidence.”
6,239 records.
Eight practices.
The largest unvaccinated group they’ve studied this way.
Parents were told the schedule was settled.
This paper says the sickest-looking group on paper was the vaccinated one—and the more doses, the worse some of the signals got.
Read it, share it, and ask why this kind of comparison is still treated like contraband.