Image 1 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 2 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 3 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 4 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 5 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 6 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 7 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 8 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 9 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 10 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 11 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 12 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 13 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 14 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 15 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 16 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 17 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 18 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 19 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
Image 20 — Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche
▲ 16 r/greyhairreversal+4 crossposts

Dedifferentiation Maintains Melanocyte Stem Cells in a Dynamic Niche

(Updated to add this note: This study is on repigmentation and grey hair research, I realize the title is blind)

Sharing a study looking at repigmentation. That and hair treatments, hair follicle stimulation, and hair follicle microenvironments seem to be a common interest.

Melanocyte stem cells (McSCs) regenerate the pigment producing melanocytes that color hair during each hair cycle. As these stem cells become depleted or stop contributing to hair regeneration, hair gradually loses pigment and turns grey. Understanding why this stem cell population fails has been a long standing question in stem cell biology. The prevailing model proposed that McSCs remain undifferentiated within a specific region of the hair follicle called the bulge, while the cells they produce leave this region, become mature melanocytes, and never return to the stem cell population.

Background info that might help: Stem cells can either maintain their identity or begin differentiating. Differentiation is the process by which a stem cell gradually acquires the structure and function of a specialized cell. In the traditional model, this process moves in one direction. Once a stem cell begins differentiating, it is expected to continue towards becoming a mature cell and permanently lose the ability to function as a stem cell. This study asks whether melanocyte stem cells instead retain the ability to reverse this process.

Back to the paper. The authors found that melanocyte stem cells do not always follow a one way path toward differentiation. During each hair growth cycle, many melanocyte stem cells begin expressing genes associated with mature melanocytes and enter an intermediate stage of differentiation. Rather than continuing directly to become mature pigment producing cells, some later lose these differentiation markers and regain the characteristics and function of melanocyte stem cells. The authors conclude that this revertsal, called differentiation, is a normal mechanism used to maintain the melanocyte stem cell population.

The authors first examined where McSCs are located before hair growth begins. Previous studies suggested that these cells are primarily found in the bulge. However, 3d imaging showed that most McSCs are actually located in the neighboring hair germ. By tracking individual cells over time, the authors showed that McSCs in their hair germ both generated mature melanocytes and produced cells that remained in the stem cell population for future hair cycles. This demonstrated that the hair germ contains the main population responsible for both pigment regeneration and long term maintenance. The authors then ask whether McSCs change ad hair growth begins. They found that these cells changed shape and activated genes involved in pigment production before producing mature melanocytes. Single cell RNA sequencing confirmed that the cells occupied an intermediate molecular state between undifferentiated melanocyte stem cells and fully differentiated melanocytes. These changes occurred early in regeneration, showing that McSCs normally begin the differentiation process during each hair cycle.

To determine whether differentiating cells could return to the stem cell population, the actors permanently labeled McSCs expressing Oca2, a one that is activated late during differentiation. As expected, some of these labeled cells became mature melanocytes that produced pigment in the hair bulb. Unexpectedly, other labeled cells migrated to another region of the hair follicle, switched off pigmentation genes, and persisted as McSCs through multiple rounds of hair regeneration. This demonstrated that cells that had already progressed well into differentiation could reverse that process and regain stem cell function.

The authors showed that nearly all melanocyte stem cells can undergo reversible differentiation rather than maintaining a permanently undifferentiated population. This process is controlled by local signals within the hair follicle. WNT signaling promotes differentiation in the hair germ, whereas reduced WNT signaling in the bulge allows cells to dedifferentiate and regain stem cell function. During aging, many McSCs fail to return to the hair germ and instead remain in the bulge, reducing melanocyte regeneration and contributing to hair greying.

I find it odd that the study doesn't investigate why. Like okay it explains where the cells get stuck... but then doesn't go for more. So like several possibilities could be the cause. The ECM around the follicle stiffens with age, adhesion molecules change, epithelial cells stop producing guidance cues, McSCs themselves lose the migration capacity, or all of these things happen together. It's hard to actually figure out what the best intervention is without that being identified. I'll set aside that a successful repigmentation study does exist and come back to that in the comments so I can just separate ideas. But, restoring McSC movement is something to think about. If those cells are stranded in the bulge and still alive, but just in the wrong place, a treatment that would encourage them to migrate back into the hair germ before the next cycle could be a plan of attack. So manipulating cell adhesion molecules (how tightly cells stick to their surroundings), extracellular proteins, chemokine signaling (cellular communication that guide movement), cytoskeletal regulators (proteins that control the assembly, disassembly, and organization of a cell's structural network) that control migration, etc because these would restore the normal regenerative cycle not trying to force pigment production. The paper shows that McSC identity depends on local signals so another approach could be instead of targeting the stem cells directly, you could try restoring the signals of the aging hair germ (WNT signaling, TGF-β , endothelin, stem cell factor/c-Kit, or notch signaling. Navigating this seems easier said than done though as these pathways regulate many cell types so it would need really precise timing. Also grey hair has been difficult to reverse by changing one of these pathways alone is prob not likely to restore the normal regenerative cycle and this paper kind of reinforces that. Another treatment approach could be if you think about how some McSCs become stuck in a partially differentiated state, it may be possible to push them back toward a differentiated state. The difficult is that forcing cells backwards carries risks if control is lost (abnormal growth or cancer). A different approach to look at would be instead of reversing greying, preserve the normal cycle earlier in life. If the problem is that stem cells gradually lose mobility over decades, then maintaining extracellular matrix structure, preventing fibrosis, or reducing chronic inflammation around the follicle might delay greying. If you are actually interested in these topics and looking through them, these are all 3 common themes we keep seeing across all literature right now in various spaces btw, if you're new here and interested write those down lol. And then a possible treatment could be if you think how McSCs only regenerate pigment during the normal hair cycle, a treatment or therapy might work if it times up with several events. So you'd want to trigger a new hair cycle, restore the proper niche signals, allow stem cells to migrate, and then let pigment producing melanocytes regenerate naturally. But that's very complex.

>

Abstract

>For unknow reasons, the melanocyte stem cell (McSC) system fails earlier than other adult stem cell populations, which leads to hair greying in most humans and mice. Current dogma states that McSCs are reserved in an undifferentiated state in the hair follicle niche, physically segregated from differentiated progeny that migrate away following cues of regenerative stimuli. Here we show that most McSCs toggle between transit-amplifying and stem cell states for both self-renewal and generation of mature progeny, a mechanism fundamentally distinct from those of other self-renewing systems. Live imaging and single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that McSCs are mobile, translocating between hair follicle stem cell and transit-amplifying compartments where they reversibly enter distinct differentiation states governed by local microenvironmental cues (for example, WNT). Long-term lineage tracing demonstrated that the McSC system is maintained by reverted McSCs rather than by reserved stem cells inherently exempt from reversible changes. During ageing, there is accumulation of stranded McSCs that do not contribute to the regeneration of melanocyte progeny. These results identify a new model whereby dedifferentiation is integral to homeostatic stem cell maintenance and suggest that modulating McSC mobility may represent a new approach for the prevention of hair greying.

>Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05960-6.

>Peer review information Nature thanks Nick Barker, Rui Yi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

u/Science_Pls — 1 day ago
▲ 96 r/aestheticnursing+4 crossposts

GLP-1RA and the possible skin aging

This review looks at what we keep seeing (Ozempic face) and investigates whether it's a result of rapid fat loss or could GLP-1 rector agonists directly accelerate aging. The authors actually conclude that both may be true. And ironically, they also have research showing they have anti-aging effects on other parts of the body by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. They examine whether mechanisms beyond fat loss may contribute to skin aging during GLP-1 therapy. Skin aging is characterized by reduced mitotic activity, impaired skin barrier function, decreased collagen and elastin product, diminished cellular proliferation, increased apoptosis, and elevated oxidative stress. Increased production of reactive oxygen stress damages DNA and cellular membranes, activates signaling pathways that reduce pro collagen synthesis, and stimulates inflammatory pathways involved in collagen metabolism.

GLP-1s have proven research on type 2 diabetes, obesity, and weight loss, but they also have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects have been investigated for skin diseases. As their use has increased, so has facial aging associated with significant weight loss been noticed. The change is usually connected to the loss of facial fat because it alters facial contours and results in excess skin, more visible wrinkles, and changes in facial proportions. The authors note that this phenomenon is not unique to GLP-1s though, and has also been described following bariatric surgery. Histological studies of patients with major weight loss have demonstrated alterations in dermal structure, including changes in collagen and elastic fiber density.

The authors describe evidence suggesting that GLP-1s may influence dermal white adipose tissue (DWAT) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). These both express GLP-1 receptors. DWAT contribute to skin maintenance and regeneration and reduced DWAT has been associated with aging skin, decreased collagen production, and increased activity of an enzyme involved in collagen degradation (matrix metalloproteinase-1.) Studies show that GLP-1 receptors on ASDCs may decrease the production of protective cytokines and growth factors, impair fibroblast migration and collagen synthesis, and increase oxidative stress within the cells. There's also a lot more interesting in the weeds findings, but don't want this to get crazy long. They touch on estrogen receptors, muscle loss, etc.

The authors ALSO found evidence suggesting that GLP-1RAs may have effects that support skin health too. It reduces chronic inflammation and lower concentrations of AGEs. They also associate this with reduction of blood glucose levels. There are various studies touching on this as well. The authors also found from other studies that GLP-1s improve endothelial function and increase microvascular perfusion within the skin and subcutaneous tissue. But they note that no published study has directly linked these effects to delay skin aging yet and state additional research is needed.

The point of this review is that it argues Ozempic face is way more complex than simply losing facial fat, but there is currently still not enough evidence that GLP-1s directly age the skin. Please do not take this as discouragement from using them or as fear mongering. I want people to know the science of what could be going on. Keep in mind that this is a mini review, not a clinical trial. A lot of the mechanisms come from biology research and inferences. But what I would offer from this is. If these mechanisms are happening and you are using them, what would theoretically protect against them? If you're worried about reduced collagen signaling, you would want things that support collagen production. If you're concerned on oxidative stress, you would want to reduce oxidative damage. If it's about the reduced stem cell activity, you want to support tissue repair and regeneration. If you're worried about the loss of dermal estrogen signaling, that is currently being studied in peri and postmenopausal research. This paper to me actually is something that can be used on future research on how to combat these things.

Paschou IA, Sali E, Paschou SA, Tsamis KI, Peppa M, Psaltopoulou T, Nicolaidou E, Stratigos AJ. GLP-1RA and the possible skin aging. Endocrine. 2025 Sep;89(3):680-685. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04293-w. Epub 2025 Jun 11. PMID: 40498168; PMCID: PMC12370548.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xldxphuzqw86m7xqx5s20/GLP-1RA-and-the-possible-skin-aging.pdf?rlkey=iiqiobjnckzwu3zt4yqxm1djl&st=pato0lja&dl=0 (dropbox link is actually from Thriving Through Menopause by Chiza Westcarr)

u/Science_Pls — 21 hours ago
▲ 14 r/asianskincare+3 crossposts

Poly-d,l-Lactic Acid (Juvelook) Via Transdermal Microjet Drug Delivery for Treating Rosacea in Asian Patients

This is the first study to investigate the efficacy and safety of using laser-induced microjet injectors to administer PDLLA, tailored for the treatment of patients with rosacea.

Yes this study is not using microneedling, BUT... the paper emphasizes how Mirajet creates repeated micro-tearing, creates dermal mechanical stimulation, has rapid pressure, and no needle tracts. Those are essentially the same biological ideas with microneedling. PLUS Juvelook already has medical research with microneedling (and more in clinical trials currently.) Who knows how much of Mirage's effect is actually unique or if it deliver more uniformly. Maybe microneedling creates a different inflammatory pattern and maybe neither matters. That comparison in research paper doesn't exist here or yet, but something that should be investigated.

Also including this information as I've been doing a lot of research into rosacea because my friend has it. And I've found that tox helps.

>"In the quest for novel treatments for rosacea, botulinum toxin has emerged as a potential solution. It has demonstrated efficacy in addressing persistent erythema and flushing associated with rosacea by inhibiting mast cell degranulation and acetylcholine release, while also modulating substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and vasoactive intestinal peptide. According to various studies, botulinum toxin can alleviate symptoms of
rosacea, such as flushing and erythema, for a duration of at least 8 weeks, with its effects typically lasting between 3 and 4 months. In the case report by Yu et al., botulinum toxin was
administered to a female patient with rosacea, resulting in temporary improvement. However, 1 month after the injection, the erythema returned, following a 1-month absence of symptoms.
Subsequently, the patient received poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) via injection with a mesogun. Notably, 1 week after the injection, the patient experienced a recurrence of flushing and redness, which gradually subsided after 4 weeks without further treatment."

I also wanted to add when it comes to the safety profile of ingredients and molecules. It cites a study from 2022 where PLLA actually aggravated rosacea. So we have preliminary research on the difference between PDLLA and PLLA and rosacea now. The authors also use that study as an example on why PDLLA might behave differently. Their reasoning is essentially that PLLA is crystalline, has slower degradation, is irregular particles, and has longer inflammatory response. Versus PDLLA is amorphous, has faster degradation, is spherical porous particles, and potentially has a different tissue response. What I'd like to see in future research is comparative histology. Looking at macrophage recruitment, foreign body giant cells, IL-6, TNF-α, and mast-cell activation because how it affects wound healing and inflammation is relevant for rosacea.

Something also interesting I'd point out is that the authors propose that PDLLA induced collagen plus VEGF improves vascular stability, reinforcing the basement membrane and making superficial vessels less reactive. Most treatments for rosacea suppress inflammation, vasodilation, and neuromuscular signaling. They're suggesting that maybe chronic erythema is partly a structural dermal problem, not only an inflammatory one. That is very different at how experts look at it, now if that's true or not I dunno, but it's worth exploring.

And after seeing this, I actually am wondering if regenerative biostimulators be used not just to build collagen or stimulate regenerative aesthetics in the sense of anti-aging purposes, but to remodel inflammatory skin disease.

Seo SB, Wan J, Thulesen J, Jalali A, Vitale M, Kim SB, Yi KH. Poly-d,l-Lactic Acid Via Transdermal Microjet Drug Delivery for Treating Rosacea in Asian Patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Dec;23(12):3993-3998. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16556. Epub 2024 Sep 9. PMID: 39248245; PMCID: PMC11626325. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16556

u/Science_Pls — 7 days ago
▲ 61 r/K_beauty_insider+2 crossposts

A-Z Booster List

Hey gang,

I'm working on a more in depth booster guide, but for the sake of people wanting more information on what is safe to microneedle with I figured I'd make a cheat sheet that just lists products out.

The goal is to include each ones manufacturer, quality/contains, main ingredients, and manufacturing guides. There's more that can be added, like I'm sure I missed some and also this list will be updated from time to time.

The HA mini guide is located here (everything on that list is safe for microneedling)

A-Z List:
Aestacell Bella Skin Booster 🩷
AIOR 50 🩵
Ameela Exosomes 💚
Ami NAD+ Skin Booster 🩵
Ami Peptox 💚
Ami Tone Up 💚
Ammi Capture Time Premium 🩷
ASCE+ HRLV: Info. 👱‍♀️💚🤍(maybe 🍒)
ASCE+ IRLV 🤍🍒
ASCE+ SRLV: Study on efficacy here 💚🤍(maybe 🍒)
BCN Amino Acids 💜
BCN Argireline 💜
BCN Asian Centella 💜
BCN Base 💜
BCN Biotin 💜
BCN Dexpanthenol Provitamin B5 💜
BCN DMAE 💜💚
BCN ECQ10 💜
BCN Glutathione 600 💜
BCN HA 0.8% 💜
BCN HA 2% 💜
BCN HA 3% 💜
BCN Melano 💜
BCN Organic Silica & DMAE 💜
BCN Scalp 👱‍♀️💜
BCN Tensis Peptides 💜
BCN Vitamin A 💜
BCN Vitamin C 💜
Bijunel Rejuvero 🤍
Camellia EXO NO5 (contains exosomes and pdrn)
Caratfill Skin Booster 🩵
Celosome Aqua 🩵🤍🍒
Croma PhilArt Polyphil 💜💚🍒
CU Restore (ghk-cu booster): Info here💚
Curenex: Manufacturing info here 🩵🩷🖤🤍
Cytocare 532 💜
Cytocare 640 💜🍒
Cytocare 715 💜🍒
Dermaheal Dark Circle Solution 🩷💜🍒
Dermaheal Eyebag Solution  🩷💜🍒
Dermaheal HL  👱‍♀️💜
Dermaheal HSR  🩷💜
Dermaheal SB  🩷💜
Dermaheal SR: here 🩷💜
Dermaqual Ascorbix 20 💚
Dermaqual Dermaeclat 💚
Dermaqual DQ HA35 Hyaluronic Acid 💚
Dermaqual DQ Hair 👱‍♀️💚
Dermaqual EGF Genesis 💚
Dermaqual GSH + C1000 💚
Dermaqual Mesoglow 💚
Dermaqual Nefertiti Lift 💚
Dermaqual Rejuveyes 💚
Ejal40 💜
Elare PN Red Pro 🩷
Elaxen HA-PN 💚
Elaxen PN 💚🤍
Exoblanc COS BR 💚
Exoblanc COS CR 💚
Exoblanc COS ECM 💚
Exoblanc COS Exo 💚
Exoblanc COS PN 💚
Exosia 01
Exo Lume 🤍
Exom-Rejuvenation Face 103 💜🍒
Exotriple (pdrn + exosomes + collagen + peptides)
Exoxe: Manufacturing info here🤍
Filcore P198 ExoHealer SB Plus: here(maybe 🍒)
Gana Booster-V 🩵
Hair Luma 👱‍♀️🤍
Hairna Exosome Hair Fill 🩵🍒
Hanheal Exosome Facial Rejuvenation 🩵
Hanheal HA Ampoule
Hanheal Hair Filler 👱‍♀️🩵
Hanheal NAD+ Complex 🩷
Hanheal PDRN Booster 🩷
Hi on: More info 🤍
Hyalace
Hyaron: 🩵🖤🤍
Hyby (PDRN 1%) 🤍
iLLUMA Crystal Rose 🩵💜
iLLUMA Hydro Booster: 🩵
iLLUMA Luna: 🩵
iLLUMA NAD+ Skin Booster 💚(maybe 🍒)
iLLUMA PN: Manufacturer info here
Inno-tds HA: Manufacturer info here 💜
Inno-tds DNA Pept-HA 💜
Inno-tds Face-Nade 💜🍒 *(lipolytic so needs to be targeted to chin/*jaw)
Inno-tds Fill Up 💜
Inno-tds Firming 💜
Inno-tds Hair Loss Control 👱‍♀️💜
Inno-tds Hair Vital 👱‍♀️💜
Inno-tds Matrix 💜
Inno-tds Restructurer 💜
Inno-tds Vitamin Complex 💜
Jalupro Amino Acid 💜
Jalupro HMW 💜🍒
Jalupro Super Hydro inj. 💜🍒
Jalupro Young Eye 💜🍒
Jeunetique Exo: Manufacturing info here🩵
Jeunetique Exo hair: Info here👱‍♀️🩵
Jeunetique NAD+: Info here🩵
Jeunetique PN Pro: Info here🩵🍒
Jeunetique Eyes Pro: Info here🩵🍒
Juvelook: Research here (PDLLA) 🖤 (if wanting volume 🍒)
Juveface 🩵🍒
Juveheal A 🍒
Juveheal B
Juveheal W
Juveheal V
Kiara Reju: Manufacturing info here 🩵🩷🖤🤍
Lapuroon Aurora Super 🖤🤍
Lapuroon Aurora Vivid 🖤🤍
Lemon Bottle Skin Booster (please note this is not the lipolytic one) 🩷
Linerase Hydro 💜
Lumi Eyes 💜🍒
Lumi Eyes Pro 💜🍒
LUMI-Pro Skin Booster 💜 (maybe 🍒)
LUMI-Pro Lip Booster 💜🍒
Lumi-Meso Bright 💚
Lumi-Meso Elite 💚
Lumi-Meso Tos 💚
Lumi Pro Skin Booster 💚
Mayster HA Booster
Mayster PDRN
Metoo Healer PDRN Booster
Melsmon:  🩵
Mesoestetic cprof 213 Mesotox Soloution 💚
Mesoestetic cprof 214 Mesopeptide Solution 💚
Mesoestetic cprof 230 Meso Hair Loss Solution 👱‍♀️💚
Mesoheal PINK GLOW 💚🍒
Misfill+ Baby Face:  🤍
Misfill+ PDRN 🤍
Misfill+ Vital 🤍
Miracle Touch BR 🩵🩷🤍
NAD Luma
NCTF 135 HA: Manufacturing info here 💜 (depends 🍒)
Neofound:  (vial not serum) 💜🍒
Neogenesis Exonovue 🩷
Newest:  💜💚🍒
Newest One:  💜💚🍒
Nucleofill:  💜💚🍒
Placentex:   🍒
Plenyhage: More info 💜💚🍒
Plinest:  💜💚🍒
Pluryal Mesoline Hair 💜(maybe🍒)
Pluryal Mesoline Refresh 💜(maybe🍒)
Pluryal Mesoline Shine 💜 (maybe🍒)
Pluryal Mesoline Tight 💜 (maybe🍒)
Porzellan  
Profhilo H&L:  🩵💜💚🍒
Profhilo Structura:  🩵💜💚🤍🍒
Profhilo Body Kit:  🩵💜💚🍒
PRX-Plus 💜
Puri Heal Glow  🖤
Puri Heal Lucent   🖤
Puri Heal Revital NAD+ 🖤
Puri PDRN:  🩵🖤
Radieux+ PLLA:  (SLM)
Radieux+ PN:  (SLM)
Radieux+ Pro 68:     (SLM)
Recell PDRN Skin Booster 🤍
Redensity 1: recent research with burn care 🍒
Regenovue Aqua Shine Silver 🩷🤍
Regenovue PN 🩵🩷🤍
Reglory NAD+ NMN: Manufacturer info here🩷
Reglory PN Plus 🩷
Rejuran Skin Booster:  💚
Rejuran Synergy Skin Booster 💚
Rejuran Tone Up Booster:  🖤💚
Rejuran (PN): Video on the four types here🍒 (sold out in a lot of places currently)
Rejuva Healer:   
Rejuva re:face:    
Rejuvenex Hydro Essence (SLM)
Rejuvenex Forte (SLM)
Rejuvenex Vega Shine (SLM)
Revitalex 🩵
REVS RMT 140HPn 🖤
REVS PRO 32 🍒
Remedium Aqua plus 💜(prob 🍒)
Remedium Silk Exosome 💜
Remedium PDRN 💜(maybe 🍒)
Richesse EXO19 💚
RRS HA Eyes 💜(maybe 🍒)
RRS HA injectable 💚(maybe 🍒)
RRS Hyalift 75 PROactive 💜(maybe 🍒)
S-DNA
SAPPHIRE PDRN 🤍
SAPPHIRE S TOX 🤍
Selastin Exo Plus 🩵
Selastin Tox 🩵🤍
Selatox 10 🩵🩷
Seventy Hyal 💜(prob 🍒)
Syniro PDRN: Manufacturing info here🤍
Soonsu Ultra Reju: Manufacturing info here 🩵🩷🤍
Soonsu Ultra White:  🩵🩷🤍
SOSUM Stem Cells Activator 🤍(prob 🍒)
Sunekos 1200 💜🍒
Ultra Hair 👱‍♀️🩵
Ultragen X 🤍
V – Tech Serum 💜🍒
Velash Exo Plus 🩵
Velash SHGF11 🩵
Velatox: Manufacturing info here 🩵🩷
Vita NAD+   🩷
Vitaderm 60  
VODA DERM NMN System  🤍
White Lumi  🍒
Youthfill PN 🩵
2Xsome 🖤🤍

Everything on this list is safe for microneedling.

👱‍♀️ = for the hair/scalp
🩵 = Meamo  
🩷 = Get Glowing Skincare  
💜 = Wimpole    
🤍 = Celmade
🖤 = FO
💚 = LPG
🍒 = Would prob meso over microneedle

TBD on it's use for microneedling, but safe for meso/deeper depths
Adite 🍒
Arche 🍒
Chitogenix 🍒
Chitoink 🍒
Collafilo 🍒
Collaju 🍒
Collapleo 🍒
Collareju 🩵🍒
Conjuran: More info 🍒
Eve Nova 🍒
Glyceollins Re:New 🍒
Gouri  🩵💜🤍🍒
HarmonCA  💜🍒
Karisma: more info and research 💜🍒
Laetigen 🩵🍒
Linerase Collagen Powder 💜🍒
Manla Kar 🍒
Neauvia Organic Hydro Deluxe   💜🍒
Polydio   🍒
Purasomes IRC100+:  💚🍒
Puri COLL rh:  🩵🖤🍒
Radiesse   💜🍒
Renuva: more info 💜🍒
Res Novae Crystal Plus 🍒
Sculptra   💜🍒
Tesoro Collagen   🖤🍒
Ultra CA+   🍒
Ultra Coll   🍒
VODA DERM RH Matrix   🤍🍒
Volassom   🍒

u/DIY-sparkling-mod — 17 days ago

I had an incorrect spam filter on my account (this is removed now) but now my sub seems to be affected still by it

So this happened about a week ago and I was able to appeal it. The sub was growing 500-1k every two weeks and since the account issue the sub is having lots of issues. In the last week my sub has dropped 4k weekly visitors, engagement has dropped significantly, posts views have dropped by thousands, and the sub is no longer showing up in recommended for users that would be interested, it’s only showing up to people that already follow it. Is there anything to do about this? Thank you!

reddit.com
u/Science_Pls — 20 days ago
▲ 60 r/haircareaddiction+3 crossposts

Updates in Hair Research

Some new research on hair from the World Congress of Hair Research.

>Here's the post copy from the original post
Newest scientific discoveries in hair research. More information about each study can be found by its presenter, listed below by slide.

Slide 2. Gyusang Jeong (AmorePacific R&I Center, Korea)

Slide 3: Bianca Maria Piraccini (Private Dermatology Practice, Italy)

Slide 4A: Cheng Zhou (Peking University, China)
Slide 4B: Juan Jimenez-Cauhe (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Spain)

Slide 5A: Jérémy Chéret (CUTANEON, USA)
Slide 5B: Byung Cheol Park (Dankook University, Korea)
Slide 5C: Ralf Paus (University of Miami, USA)

Slide 6: Kathrin Hillmann (Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany)

Slide 7: Xie Jun (Wuhan University, China)

Slide 8: Unilever (CLEAR) Dr. Pi Longquan (Professor in Department of Dermatology and Cosmetology; Director of Medical Cosmetology; Yanbian University Hospital, China)

Slide 9: Julie Thornton (University of Bradford, UK)

u/Glittering-Prior-865 — 27 days ago

Paper: Intradermal “Skin Boosters”: Are We Targeting Too Superficially?

I saw this recent paper that I thought might be interesting to share. It's a clinical commentary, but its main argument is that intradermal skin boosters work, but clinicians may sometimes be injecting too superficially, causing avoidable pain, bruising, erythema, papules, and PIH risk.

It explains why the dermis is more reactive, there's dense sensory nerves, capillaries, and immune cells. The figures on pages 2–3 are useful, Figure 1 contrasts intradermal vs subdermal planes, and Figure 2 lays out the proposed mechanism of less microinjury and inflammation with subdermal injection, plus possible fibroblast activation and collagen/elastin remodeling.

The evidence for subdermal HA skin boosters is still early and indirect, but still worth thinking about imo. The paper relies on biologic plausibility, adjacent studies, ultrasound observations, and real-world practice reports. It does not prove that subdermal delivery is equivalent or superior to intradermal delivery. Also gotta consider that deeper planes may involve larger vessels, so vascular anatomy, slow low pressure injection, dosing, and product choice remain critical.

u/Science_Pls — 28 days ago
▲ 27 r/Estheticians+3 crossposts

Worth Reading: Micropore visualization and lifetime following microneedle application to skin of differing pigments

Happy Sunday! Hope everyone has been enjoying the weather and their weekend.

We're starting to compile guides where a lot of the resources can live so you don't need to dig through stuff to find them. But, in the meantime we'll keep sharing resources.

Wanted to share this 2025 study and some of their findings. They found that microneedles penetrated equally across skin colors. The authors originally hypothesized that darker skin may exhibit longer micropore lifetimes because the needles penetrate deeper. That hypothesis was not supported. Which, this is a useful finding because it suggests insertion mechanics are similar across pigmentation levels.

Another thing they found was that micropores stayed open longer in darker skin. The study confirms earlier findings from the same research group and suggests that drug delivery through microneedles may last longer in darker skin, potentially altering drug exposure. At 24 hours there was no statistically significant difference. At 48 hours there was an 18.1% difference in closure between darkest and lightest groups, darker skin retained more open micropores, was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and OCT images and impedance measurements agreed.

Another finding was that skin barrier function was similar at baseline and no major differences were found in baseline TEWL, baseline impedance, or across pigmentation groups. This suggests darker skin is not simply more permeable or less permeable before treatment. The difference emerges specifically during healing. Something else to note is that epidermal thickness does not explain the effect. The authors investigated whether darker skin has a thicker epidermis. Initially the OCT software suggested differences. However manual measurements corrected those findings. After re-analysis there was no significant difference in epidermal thickness between groups. This is actually a nice example of researchers identifying and correcting a measurement artifact.

They also found that collagen content does not explain the effect. Using OCT-derived optical attenuation coefficients as a proxy for collagen found no significant differences among pigmentation groups. Thus collagen is unlikely to explain the prolonged micropore lifetime.

Microneedles create tiny channels (micropores) that allow drugs to pass through the skin. The duration those channels stay open determines how much drug enters the body, how long delivery continues, and potentially whether drug exposure differs between patients. If darker skin keeps micropores open longer, then more drug may be delivered, delivery may continue longer, and pharmacokinetics may differ between populations. This is especially important for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows (e.g., insulin because microneedling is also used for therapeutic medical purposes). In this paper, the use of drug basically means anything intentionally delivered through the skin to create a biological effect. That could include prescription medication, numbing agents, peptides, growth-factor-type molecules, exosomes/conditioned media, polynucleotides, hyaluronic acid skin boosters, regenerative or anti-inflammatory actives. So in aesthetic language, drug delivery is an active ingredient delivery through the skin barrier.

Something I wondered was, do darker skin tones get more of the drug/product? Possibly, but this paper did not directly prove it. The authors specifically say longer micropore lifetimes could result in higher amounts of drug reaching localized or systemic circulation, because delivery usually continues until micropores close. But they also state that blood level/pharmacokinetic studies are needed to prove the actual amount absorbed. This study suggests darker skin may have a longer absorption window, which could mean more total delivery, but it did not directly measure blood levels or final absorbed dose.

Things that I think are strong about this paper are that they used objective skin color measurement. Many dermatology studies use race, ethnicity, or FST. Instead this study used colorimetry and ITA measurements. They included diversity (Black, Asian, Caucasian, Latinx, Multiracial participants) which is uncommon in microneedling research. Now this is also from 2025, so hoping that more research is going to be more inclusive moving forward. Ideally the study would have had a larger sample size, but for some reason aesthetic research has very small numbers.

My complaints on the study are that there were no actual pharmacokinetic measurements or follow up post 48 hours. Not doing pharmacokinetic measurements is a big loss imo and that's the biggest limitation. The paper demonstrates that pores stay open longer, but it does not demonstrate if more drugs actually enter the body. They're related questions, but different. This is also why the authors call for pharmacokinetic studies. I also wish there was more investigation into the why, not just what happens. Possible explanations could be inflammatory signaling differences, wound-healing kinetics, keratinocyte migration, barrier repair mechanisms, and epidermal lipid recovery, but the paper cannot distinguish among these.

The most interesting takeaway to me is actually the negative finding. Longer micropore lifetime in darker skin is not caused by deeper needle penetration. Why I think this is helpful is because this also means that darker skin does not appear to need deeper needling for penetration. Going deeper may add unnecessary trauma without improving access. Now this is in terms of booster diffusion, not necessarily collagen induction. But, that also eliminates the simplest mechanical explanation. The implication is that the difference likely arises from skin repair biology, not from the microneedles themselves. That makes the paper more scientifically valuable because it points toward fundamental differences in barrier recovery mechanisms that remain poorly understood.

Something I interpreted from this study and that I think is worth thinking about is that darker skin may need more caution during healing. The study found that micropores in darker skin stayed open longer. That means the skin barrier may remain more permeable for longer after microneedling. After microneedling, darker skin may have a longer open window where ingredients, irritants, allergens, microbes, or actives can still pass through more easily. So post care may need to be more conservative for longer.

u/DIY-sparkling-mod — 28 days ago

The Healing Cascade Post Microneedling

I think the healing phase and collagen induction process can seem more complicated than it is when getting started, so simple breakdowns like this can be helpful. This carousel is from miaskinbar on IG. I should also note that the continued remodeling can last even longer, studies have found from months to even years after.

>Here's the post copy:

>Microneedling isn’t just creating “microinjuries” it’s triggering a very specific healing response within the skin. From inflammation to collagen remodeling, the skin moves through multiple phases of repair after treatment, each playing a role in strengthening, rebuilding, and improving overall skin function. This is why results from microneedling are progressive, not immediate. Real collagen remodeling takes time. Understanding the healing cascade is what helps set realistic expectations and create better long-term outcomes.

u/Science_Pls — 29 days ago

Video talking about a paper on NCTF and VAMP and healing

Hey gang, so we already shared this new paper within the sub located here. But, for those that would rather watch a video than read about it we figured we'd share this as well.

>The paper in discussion is:

>Adel N, Kolenda J. New Cellular Treatment Factor (NCTF) and Polydeoxyribonucleotide (VAMP) Injections Enhance Skin Regeneration: Experimental and Histological Evidence. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026 Feb;25(2):e70733. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70733. PMID: 41674119; PMCID: PMC12895094.

>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12895094/pdf/JOCD-25-e70733.pdf

u/Science_Pls — 29 days ago
▲ 41 r/DIYmicroneedling+1 crossposts

Microneedling: When Technique Creates Trauma

Here's a good carousel from kaiatinocyte on how technique matters in microneedling and can create trauma.

u/Science_Pls — 29 days ago

Resource Guide for Beginners

It can be overwhelming when getting started and we know some people aren't sure where to even start, so wanted to compile a guide for beginners. This list is not meant to be overwhelming, but to give you lots of different resources to learn safely. This post will be updated with more resources as they are added.

Resources
Diagrams of layers of the skin: here
Needling depth diagrams: here
Microneedling depth and directional chart: here
Post on anatomy and physiology of the skin: here
Video on a 3d visual of the skin: here
Post on skin thickness variation: here
Diagrams of the wound healing cascade (and timelines): here
How aging affects the wound healing cascade: here
Antiseptic agents: here
Video on proper post procedure care: here
Video on sanitation: here
Video on how to avoid granulomas: here
Bruun is not safe for medical microneedling: here
Regular skincare products are not safe for medical microneedling: here
Dr. Pen speed guide: here (disregard for other devices)
Dr. Pen depth guide: here
Dr. Pen pen model comparison guide: here
Things to avoid before microneedling: here
Men's guide to cosmetic treatments: here

Acne Scars
Video breaking down acne scars: here
Diagrams of types of atrophic acne scars: here
Acne Scars Classification and Treatment Textbook: here

Stretch Marks
Study on a comparison of microneedling new vs older stretch marks: here

When it comes to where to start to learn the science, here are a few posts to give you direction.

Where to start: Part 1 
Where to start: Part 2
Where to start: Part 3 
Where to start: Part 4

There's also various studies under the medical literature flair/button that you can look through protocols and more information.

The sub's wiki has some textbooks that are helpful so I encourage you to check those out as well. There will be a separate booster guide being posted soon.

reddit.com
u/Science_Pls — 29 days ago
▲ 22 r/DIYmicroneedling+1 crossposts

Collagen diversity in human skin: Aging, wound healing, and disorders

Hi gang, so someone reported me to Reddit and my account u/science-pls has been shadow banned, so that's fun!

Thankfully, u/DIY-sparkling-mod has been able to restore my posts and comments here or at least most of them, (it's a very time consuming process for them to manually go through everything. But, none of my other content in other subs will be visible until the ban is lifted. I've made educational posts in other places, like r/DIYaesthetics which if you haven't joined that sub as well, it's also a great resource and community to learn from. But, you won't be able to access them or my actual profile until the ban is lifted.

I'm able to still post in this sub if our other lovely mod manually restores it each time, but that's kind of a pain so this is another solution. I'm working on the appeal process, but in the meantime I made a second account to be able to keep posting here and in general. So this account is also me :)

ANYWAYS, I want to share more resources on collagen in general. It's become this buzzword and thing we all talk about, but there's not a lot of information on it actually. There are some nice diagrams and tables that are interesting, like changes in the levels of expression of collagen proteins or transcripts in human skin with chronological aging and also for photoaging.

I know resources like this can be dense, so this really is meant to be if you are interested in this, dive in, if not it isn't something you need to know.

Here's the abstract:

Abstract

>Collagen is an essential skin protein, accounting for 75 % of the skin's dry weight. The collagen superfamily encompasses a diverse group of proteins with a variety of structures that fulfil a wide range of functions. The half-life of collagen in the skin is generally estimated at 10 to 15 years; however, the expression pattern of the different types of skin collagen varies throughout life. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence collagen turn-over within the different skin layers. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of the different types of collagen present in human skin, focusing on insights gained from research exploring the dynamic roles of these proteins in skin development, homeostasis including aging, collagen-linked pathologies, adaptability in response to stress, and wound healing-related processes and disorders. Specificities of skin diversity due to ancestral origin and gender will also be discussed.

>Keywords: Aging; Ancestry; Collagen; Collagenopathies; Development; Fibrosis; Human skin; Wound healing.

u/Glittering-Prior-865 — 29 days ago