u/ThrowAway237s

Having EDP as a fan would probably feel somewhat embarrassing to them, so have they ever publicly voiced their disapproval of him?

Date: 2027-2032. Evidence: The history of Mayday titles is full of aliterations.

A video captured in "HDR" isn't necessarily saved in an HDR format.

Ther image sensor might capture in "HDR", but the resulting video file might be an ordinary non-HDR MP4 file, except the bright areas don't appear overexposed and the dark areas don't appear underexposed, but when played back on an HDR screen, the brightness difference is not as much as if it were an actual HDR video file.

For example, the earliest smartphones marketed as having a camera that supports "HDR video", such as the Xperia Z (without number) and the Galaxy S5, didn't actually store the video in an HDR format. Their image sensor delivered an HDR image, but the camera software encoded it into an ordinary MP4 file.

When recording an HDR video, from what I understand, the image sensor reads different rows of pixels at different sensitivities. For example, the first row of pixels might be read at 1/30 shutter speed, the second row at 1/60, the third row at 120, and then repeating. Then the lines are combined (similar to de-interlancing) and tone-mapped, meaning the brightest parts from the 1/120 exposure time rows will appear brighter in the video than the brightest parts from the 1/60 and 1/30 rows.

However, this will only result in an HDR video file if the camera software is able to encode a video in an HDR format. What the image sensor delivers and what the camera software saves are two separate things.

This is unlike HDR photographs, where separate images are captured and combined into one. HDR photos don't have the time constraint that each frame of an HDR video has.

---

I hereby release this post into the public domain under CC0 1.0.

If the audio of the video is not so loud, I might dial up the volume. Then, that sound at the end of TikTok videos ends up being louder than the audio of the video itself, which causes an annoying shock.

I have no idea what this sound is supposed to accomplish. It is not cool. It adds no value. All it does is cause pain to headphone users.

„Mein Statement zur ApoRed & MiiMii Thematik“ war ein Video von Kaan Yavi zum Streit zwischen ApoRed und MiiMii. Er veröffentlichte es Ende Juni 2026 und entfernte es kurze Zeit später aufgrund scharfer Kritik.

• URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s4BcPVHnV0
• Kanal: YaviReaction

Ausschnitte aus dem Video sind sichtbar in der Reaktion von KuchenTV. Hat jemand das ganze Video?

From what I understand, (1) larger batteries have less internal resistance, (2) a battery heats up less if charged at the same speed at lower percentages. (3) there is less internal resistance at higher temperatures.

But does it take more energy to charge a battery from, say, 0 to 10%, or from 90 to 100%? Or is it a bathtub curve? (least resistance near 50%)

This is relevant for powerbank charging, because unlike the wall, the powerbank is not an "unlimited", "inexhaustible" source of power.

Date: Before 2035. Evidence: Disney also bought 20th Century Fox. Princesses also appear in DreamWorks movies like the Shrek trilogy. If Disney are on an acquisition spree, DreamWorks would be the next obvious target.

A "global ban" is a ban from editing all Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) wikis declared by staff members, which can not be reversed by the volunteer administrators or by community vote. These aren't given out lightly, but are reserved for the "worst of the worst", usually handed out to the likes of pedophilia promoters (most famously Nathan Larson), and people who cause legal trouble, or at least considerable drama. Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger would fall into the third category, and possibly into the second category.

Larry Sanger has been criticizing Wikipedia for decades, especially harshly in recent years. Last month, he was banned from the English-language Wikipedia. After all the drama caused by him, most recently him advocating for requiring high-ranking functionaries to publicly disclose their real names, and stricter regulation of Wikipedia, and removal of Section 230 protections, an impending global ban against him is not far-fetched, though it wouldn't stop his advocacy outside Wikipedia.

---

Date: Before 2028. Evidence: See above.

It seems roughly in 2023, Samsung took away the option to unlock a phone without pressing "OK". Probably, the thought behind it was to prevent an attacker from being able to find out the length of the PIN, because with "OK-less" unlocking, the lockscreen will reject an entered PIN once its length is reached but the PIN is wrong.

Sadly, this removal lead to the loss of convenience. It requires one additional touch at every unlock for those who don't trust biometric unlocking. And the loss of convenience is guaranteed, while what it seeks to prevent is just a small likelihood. It sacrifices a lot of convenience for a tiny bit of security.

A better solution

Here is how it could have been implemented without reducing security: Don't reject the incorrect PIN or password once its length has been reached, but still automatically accept a correct PIN or password. This prevents the length of the PIN from being revealed to an attacker.

Now, you'd think "doesn't that make it possible to brute-force the PIN?"

To that, the solution is treating a certain count of keystrokes without a successful unlock, such as 100, like 5 failed attempts with pressing "OK". This disables the keypad for a duration escalating from 30 seconds.

This count should not be dependent on the length of the password or PIN, such as the length multiplied by five, because that would expose the length again.

Another useful option would be to disable visual feedback on the keypad screen. This means the keypad is visible, but no dots appear above it for every character, and the keys don't light up if you tap them.

---

I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0.

My closest guess is Edward. Edward the wolf.

His voice sounds like an Edward.