Why do people never say Tony Khan should step down as booker?
Since i was on forums back in the late 90s i've seen numerous posts about how vince mcmahon is out of touch and should step down. I saw posts about vince russo and jeff jarrett being rubbish at TNA and needing to step down.
I now see tons of people tweeting or posting about HHH needing to step aside as WWE is stale etc and creative isn't good.
Yet I never see any comments about Tony Khan needing to step aside from creative to give AEW a boost? yet the ratings are fairly low currently? surely the measurable of the success of a companies creativity is ratings or live attendance? Yet aew is flat for both.
WWE is coming down from a boom quite obviously but is still bigger in both ratings and attendance than AEW. So why does HHH get the posts about stepping down but Tony Khan is given a free pass?
Especially odd because Tony khan has no history in the wrestling industry except running an e fed as a teenager and having access to his fathers wealth.
I genuinely want to know why no one ever even discusses the concept of tony khan giving the creative role to someone else in a hope for a refresh for AEW and higher ratings/attendances etc.