
u/fries-eggpanvol8647

How relatively unbeknownst is your culture/language? For example, this Khortha language is used by more than eight million people in India, yet it still has no ISO code, not listed on Ethnologue and Glottolog catalogs to mark its existence.
Bugan, an almost forgotten indigenous language of Yunnan, China
Iron age Austro-asiatic South Asia
Etyma of horse in some 'obscure' South Asian languages
Because, why not?
Comparing Vietnamese and other 14 related languages basic vocabulary: 1-10
Indianization in SEA vs inside India itself, same language family
What languages the Nanmans of the Three Kingdoms era might have spoken?
Bolyu, a hidden language in Guangxi, China, remnant of a likely larger Pakanic presence in the past
Linguistic landscape of Mainland Southeast Asia
Could this man possibly pass as African or Afro-Latino Dominican, Mexican, or Brazilian?
The Phonological System of Kri Phoong in Vietnam and an Extensive Glossary (2026)
evols.library.manoa.hawaii.eduThis sub: We love agglutinative and vowel harmony like Daehan Nhihon-go-chan sugoi 🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 🥰🥰🌸🌸 EXCEPT Vietazaribagh, India👎👎🤢🤮🤢🤮😡😡😡😤😤
Calligraphic version of the Santali Ol Chiki script
Keraʔ Mundari Dictionary, a Mundari variety spoken by some 200,000 ethnic Kuɽux in Ranchi, Jharkhand
livingdictionaries.appRoger Blench (2023) - Rongic: A vanished branch of Austroasiatic
evols.library.manoa.hawaii.eduReflexes of "fish" in Austroasiatic branches and my scenario for the *k2 anomalies
When Hsiu began his reconstruction of Pakanic, everyone was assuming that Austroasiatic began in MSEA and started migrating elsewhere like a radiating sun. So Bugan and Bolyu were thought to be northern most expansion of pAA, even though Hsiu and Li outrightly noted that Pakanic speakers historically had a more northern and wider distribution than being confined to endangered pockets nowadays. Today that hypothesis is completely ridicolous because it ignores the pre-Neolithic Eastern Eurasian hunter-gatherer population entirely, who didn't speak Austroasiatic, plus historical demographic movements, new genetic, botanical, climate, and archaeological evidence. This would explain why a *q proposal might be possible because it would likely to satisfy the messes in other branches.