u/qalpi

Fully local "Google Discover" read-next extension that I've built

Fully local "Google Discover" read-next extension that I've built

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lume-read-next-news/

Hey friends,

I'm the dev behind this extension, it just got approved and I'd welcome some feedback.

The idea is a fully local, privacy-focused news discovery system, akin to Google Discover. As you read around the web, it embeds against a tiny local model (25MB), and then ranks you against a US news feed of recent stories (currently > 24 hours old). It then recommends in-article what to "read next" and also offers a standlone page, pictured above, with a list of recommended stories.

All of this happens locally in your browser.

Besides the request for images, no user data is shared whatsoever. No analytics. No telemetry.

Is it useful? Do you want it to be more privacy focused (like blocking the image loads?) Do you want a wider range of news stories? Does 25MB feel like too much if your machine is a bit slower?

Thank you!

u/qalpi — 7 days ago
▲ 6 r/OWC

The OWC 1M2 80G + SN850X (mostly) kicks Apple's internal drives' collective butts

I've been testing my SN850X + OWC 1M2 80 combo, vs various internal drives across my Mac Minis and Mac Studio. The external combo beats anything internal by a mile on almost every single metric, and especially on sustained activities.

I've switched to using my external combo as my main boot drive.

Just thought this might be of interest to those considering the newer model.


Random I/O -- what makes your Mac feel fast

These are the metrics that matter for app launches, Spotlight, swap, and general snappiness. Higher is better.

Test WD SN850X (Express 1M2) Apple 1TB (internal) Apple 2TB (internal)
Random Read 4K QD1 15,175 IOPS 13,109 IOPS 11,311 IOPS
Random Write 4K QD1 10,433 IOPS 7,746 IOPS 7,141 IOPS
Random Write 4K QD32 64,372 IOPS 38,769 IOPS 25,436 IOPS
Mixed R/W 70/30 QD16 99,700 IOPS 75,069 IOPS 68,590 IOPS

The external wins every random I/O test.


Latency -- lower is better

p99 latency at 4K QD1. These are the micro-stutters you feel when the OS writes swap or logs.

Test WD SN850X (Express 1M2) Apple 1TB (internal) Apple 2TB (internal)
4K Read p99 112 us 142 us 171 us
4K Write p99 180 us 305 us 1,630 us

The 2TB really underperforms on latency.


Sequential throughput

This is where Apple's internal SSD wins -- large sequential writes. Higher is better.

Test WD SN850X (Express 1M2) Apple 1TB (internal) Apple 2TB (internal)
Seq Read 1M QD1 4,538 MB/s 3,123 MB/s 3,106 MB/s
Seq Write 1M QD1 4,355 MB/s 6,062 MB/s 5,816 MB/s
Seq Read 1M QD8 6,639 MB/s 6,506 MB/s 6,688 MB/s
Seq Write 1M QD8 5,585 MB/s 6,897 MB/s --
Seq Read 128K 2,160 MB/s 682 MB/s 728 MB/s
Seq Write 128K 2,118 MB/s 3,264 MB/s 2,984 MB/s

Sustained write -- 5 minutes continuous

5 minutes of continuous 1M sequential writes with per-second bandwidth logging and SMART temperature monitoring.

Metric WD SN850X (Express 1M2) Apple 1TB (internal)
Avg bandwidth 5,284 MB/s 1,410 MB/s
Min bandwidth (1s sample) 4,091 MB/s 35 MB/s
Max bandwidth (1s sample) 5,669 MB/s 2,736 MB/s
Total data written 1,548 GB 413 GB
Mean latency 746 us 2,823 us
p99 latency 3,097 us 26,083 us
p99.9 latency 8,356 us 104,333 us

The Apple drive shows severe SLC cache exhaustion, and keeps crashing while it writes down. The WD maintains 5,000+ MB/s throughout with a gentle decline to ~4,900 MB/s.


Thermals

Both drives' temperatures were logged simultaneously during each test to check for cross-heating through the chassis.

Metric WD SN850X (Express 1M2) Apple 1TB (internal)
Start temp 34C 33C
Peak temp 56C 71C
Temp rise +22C +38C

The Express 1M2's passive cooling keeps the WD at 56C under sustained full write load. The Apple internal hits 71C.

reddit.com
u/qalpi — 13 days ago

Command-line disk speed testing -- need some testers

After my post earlier about external vs internal SSD, I set about creating a disk speed tester that went further than Blackmagic (mostly I wanted to test queue handling and latency on TB5 vs Internal).

Anyway, I (yes with some assistance of Claude) built a command line testing tool, and I added on a leaderboard website. Would love some of you guys to test it if you have time. It can run against a single drive, or compare two at once (hence "Duel").

https://preview.redd.it/jpio75c1000h1.png?width=891&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6026f5d0644ccf9dc6a005a82ed1779f1a6d7de

The website: https://apps.cleartextlabs.com/disk-duel/

GitHub: https://github.com/digitalhen/disk-duel

The script:

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/digitalhen/disk-duel/main/disk_duel.py -o /tmp/disk_duel.py && python3 /tmp/disk_duel.py --upload

Feedback & hate mail are welcome.

reddit.com
u/qalpi — 14 days ago

External booting from SSD

I've got a pair of Studios. Identical specs except for the internal drives (one is 1TB, the other is 2TB). I was able to get the smaller one tax free, so basically the 2TB cost me $600 more than the other. I need to return one today.

Currently I'm booting from my external SSD (SN850X 4TB + OWC 1M2 80Gbps) and it seems rock solid. Speeds consistently equal or beat the internal SSD.

Do you think there's any chance that Apple might eventually block external booting on M-series Macs?

Edit: If anyone interested, my external drive beats the internal on almost every category

https://preview.redd.it/a4cvraq86xzg1.png?width=631&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f277a83960e57603c12aec78475006ee7d863a7

reddit.com
u/qalpi — 15 days ago

I have a split career between banking tech and now journalism and news product.

u/qalpi — 23 days ago