



















Claire said my viral story of being abused at 14 was "fetish content"
How is this considered appropriate rhetoric? After my post about being SAed by my family doctor when I was 14 went viral, she subtweeted about the incident, indirectly implying that it was a lie written for sexual gratification.
The way she described my post in the first few tweets she made, adopting a quasi-academic, condescending tone--it was beyond repulsive. She talked about me being raped at 14, like I was an animal or some peculiar life form being studied by an anthropologist.
It's abundantly clear from her descriptions of the incident, and the fact it was posted in the same day mine went viral, and the fact she made a post of her own, QTing the same post mine was in reference to (I QTed someone else who QTed the original poster; she QTed the original post), that she was talking about me being raped. At 14. And describing it as fetish content.
I'm bringing attention to this, because I think this should be condemned by anyone who cares about CSA survivors. Literally, maybe the reason I write so descriptively is because I'm an author of multiple books?
My post: https://x.com/AdenPolydoros/status/2072719693388165358
Her subtweet: https://x.com/burnyourbinder/status/2072787606274757059
Here is the short video I made in response to her: