u/Tims_Learing_Center

Irish last names

"Saint Paul Man"

Neighbors thank the police bc they can use the parks again

And police thank flock bc it helped catch these animals

But you whacked out libs sitting in your mom's basement in Carlisle or Winchester or Cambridge think those 40 are just anecdotes and flock is fascism

Insufferable

Nice Kufi as well

Get out of the kitchen

Our tax money being stolen by a Massachusetts politician...say it ain't so

I was digging into this a little bit, and one of the plaintiffs in the jensen case is CCRKBA.

They don't directly have members or take general membership from the public. However they have state affiliates.

Goal is one of those state affiliates.

My question to the group is, if you are a member of goal. Do you enjoy the benefits of the jensen ruling?

Lots of "ez"s

Those damn Irish Americans. Don't they know its an election year?

Here's another "anecdote"

I love the idea of a supersafety or FRT but I'm really nervous about the whole legality piece.

My understanding is that DNT or Atrius or Hoffman have no obligation to run anything by the ATF b/c those parts are unregulated parts. They have as much obligation as a manufacturer who makes paintbrushes.

But I saw the new OneHorse FRT rifles/pistols. I theory those weapons have to go through some ATF approval process right? And if they do that means that the ATF has implicitly confirmed the legality of the FRT in it. Does that make sense?

The Left enables crime. You goofballs scream about Epstein meanwhile taxpayers are getting bludgeoned to death by criminals on their morning commutes

You dinguses: Nothing to see here. Fuck ICE!

Wonder if the aspiring rapper shooter had an LTC?

Do they say adios in brazilian?

The first one serving a prison sentence but because Mass won't work with ICE instead of the safety of a jail they had to serve his arrest out on the streets.

They libs wonder why people are getting shot and run over on the pavement.

They have you dopes hook line and stinker

They hate the Bill of Rights

Want to know your thoughts

But you dolts won't listen.

Thank you ma'am may I have another

I def subscribe to the idea that a safety on a gun is just an extra failure point/buedensome manipulation under pressure, which outweighs the "safety" it's supposed to provide. There aren't *five* rules of gun safety (the fifth being make sure the safety is on) so I think for safety perspective it doesn't accomplish much (other than adding a negligible amount of insurance mitigating a negligent act, like say leaving a gun out for a toddler to access where the safety might be just enough to prevent a 2 year old from yeeting one)

But with all that out of the way, the m&p 2.0 safety acts as a great thumb rest that I believe objectively helps with control and recoil management.

First off, do people agree with that last part? If so, does the reward of better control outweigh the risk i identified above in terms of being another failure point?

Tldr do you rock a safety for control?