Petra Parker comics

I've never seen a trend like this blow up THIS fast, it's genuinely insane and I love it so much.

I hope this trend goes on for months to come <3 (maybe if we push hard enough we could even get her a Cameo in the official source material? :D)

Artist - u/S1mple_Br1t

u/Zouif_Zouif — 1 day ago

Baby Fever is a scary thing ;-;

Cuts to me demanding to be breed by my fiancee even though we're both women.

u/Zouif_Zouif — 2 days ago

Leave it to the ladies

During the Siege of Weinsberg in 1140 AD, King Conrad III allowed the women inside the castle to leave safely with whatever they could carry on their backs. Instead of grabbing jewels or clothes, the women carried out their husbands on their shoulders. Surprised by their clever loophole, the King kept his word and spared the men.

u/Zouif_Zouif — 4 days ago

The beauty of affirmative care, it's gender blind &lt;3

Seriously though why is Hormone therapy such a stigmatized topic in a lot of crossdressing or femboy spaces?

u/Zouif_Zouif — 6 days ago
▲ 92 r/ck3+1 crossposts

CK3 Decision Concept: "Shaming"

DESCRIPTION: "Although we as mortals have no right to severely punish sinners for their misdeeds, that does not mean we cannot do anything to discourage others to commit the same transgressions against the divine! Sinners of my realm will no longer be able to hide in shadows, for I will bring their shame to light. Be they Peasant or Noble."

REQUIREMENTS:

• Must follow a Faith that has all criminal doctrines set to shunned.

• Must have at least one Vassal in your realm be accused of a proven shunned crime.

• Must not have any proven shunned traits

• Level of Faith must not be Sinner (1)

• Piety cost increases depending on the rank of the Vassal you wish to Shun, 100 for Baron, 300 for count, 600 for Duke, 900 for King and 1500 for Emperor.

EFFECTS:

• The target of the shunning can refuse to be subjected to public shunning, In this case they will receive a negative modifier (Refused Repentance) decreasing clergy and Zealot Vassal opinion by -50. Decreasing General Vassal opinion by -10, Followers of the same faith opinion by -5 and decreasing monthly Piety, Prestige and Legitimacy gain by -50% for 25 years. At higher Crown Authorities, this can even be considered a crime and warrant a title revocation.

• If the target accepts they will lose 1 level of Fame and 1 level of Devotion, they will also receive the negative modifier "Recent Shunning" draining monthly Prestige, Piety and Legitimacy by 1.0 each month. Vassal opinion will decrease by -10, Same-Faith opinion by -5 for 1 year.

• The target of the shunning will lose -50 opinion of you (shunned) for 10 years.

• Zealot Vassals and Clergy will gain 25 opinion of you for 5 years (Shunned sinner.)

• All other Vassals will gain 5 opinion of you for 5 years (Shunned Sinner)

• You will gain the "Great Shamer" positive modifier for 5 years, increasing Piety and Prestige gain by +10%

• The Target can never be shamed for the same crime again, however they can experience another shaming if they commit a different shunned crime.

• Cannot perform another shunning for 5 years.

NEW CRIME MECHANICS - ACCUSED AND PROVEN:

During the new shaming mechanic you can only shame a person who has a proven shamed crime, a character who only has a accused shamed crime cannot be punished unless proven.

When a Character is accused of a crime there is a set chance that it will either default to a accused crime or a proven crime. Certain aspects all play into this new mechanic such as, the accusers intrigue. The rank and standing of the accuser, as well as the opinion of the clergy of them. This also applies vise-versa to the accused, their Rank, level of Devotion and clergy opinion of them all increase the likelihood of the crime being set to accused.

When a Character is set to an accused crime, the crime trait will only have half of the negative effects applied to the character and cannot be rightly punished until proven guilty.

When a Character is accused, their accuser can do several actions to turn their accused crime to proven, such as spending Piety and Gold to their head of faith to automatically prove them guilty (this depends of the head of faiths opinion of the accuser, the accused and several other modifiers.) starting a "prove crime" scheme or using random events to their advantage.

The accused however can also spend piety and gold to clear their name from their head of faith, use the "clear name" personal scheme, or using random events to their advantage. If in enough time neither side is able to prove or clear the crime, the accused crime will eventually fade away on its own. This can take from a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 30.

u/Zouif_Zouif — 17 days ago

So Controversial

So controversial it loops back to being tame again... At least I think that's how that works

u/Zouif_Zouif — 19 days ago

Thoughts on this?

I also need help identifying if this is AI or not, I've run it through a few tests and all have back around the 40-50% likely it's AI

u/Zouif_Zouif — 21 days ago

Life currently

Don't you just love being exactly 4'11 so you have to get ID checked whenever making the slightest purchase? ( I don't even drink or smoke and this happens way more than you think )

u/Zouif_Zouif — 21 days ago

I believe a strong Vanguard season is the healthiest season compared to strong Duelists and Strategiest seasons.

It's been only a few weeks since the biggest and most meta shifting Update in Rivals history had been dropped, since then I'm already seeing both people from the community and influencers call for tank nerfs and complaining that they're too strong.

I disagree, compared to last seasons this season feels the most rewarding when working with your team and forces a good balance of needed value from all 3 of the roles.

During the strong DPS seasons damage was so high and duelists were so oppressive with their base damage and crowd controlling abilities that they were the ONLY role having fun while the other two were forced to take a back seat for them.

During the strong Strategist seasons everything felt so devalued compared to ults, they by far became to most important aspect of the game with neutral becoming less important. Nothing was happening until an ult was popped which felt tedious and unfun for both Duelists and Vanguards, for half the game they could do nothing until they had their ultimate and even then only some Vanguards and duelists could have value with their ults because support ults were so strong at the time.

A strong vanguard season has neither of these drawbacks, it puts more attention and value towards the Frontline and for brawl tanks. Forcing dive DPS to have synergy with their dive tanks, or forcing supports to have synergy with their Frontline when to push forward and when to push back.

I'm not a Vanguard main, I'm mostly a Strategist main but honestly the game feels way more healthy when tanks are strong. (Imo the game feels the worst when duelists are strong but that just might be a me thing)

u/Zouif_Zouif — 22 days ago