just curious if anyone here ever actually passed his stupid ass somewhere in public

in watching this trial i am surprised the judge allowed so much uncontrolled arguing between reyes and the states attorney.

while pro se usually relaxes tolerances for court rules, this trial had insults and heated exchanges throughout

it takes a lot of confidence for someone to face the intimidation of a courtroom proceeding especially when you're the one on trial

and while reyes may have made critical case errors, think about this from the argumentative perspective

reyes did an amazing job showing confidence and disdain for the accusations against him never backing down to the other side

while his legal argument may be flawed, he definitely has the characteristics that an aggressive trial attorney can always benefit from

out of all the frauditors I've watched in court, he actually carried himself well given no real legal background. other frauditors can't put two words together to make a sentence that matters.

say what you want but I expected much worse from his performance and was shocked when I saw otherwise

before you downvote ask yourself if you could match his performance in court pro se. very few of you could.

https://preview.redd.it/inz304jvogjh1.jpg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3f84047dec8f18c1e6b59167877f3d6e6da4ceae

new frauditor civic eye audits who is also black inside post office filming. black customer doesn't like it. tells him to stop. goes to push his camera and then walks away. frauditor engages and sprays him while he's walking away. shit show ensues.

spray goes everywhere in the post office making a lady cough. frauditor gets attacked outside. then gets arrested. and fapa is surprised.

I guess this is fapas new content approach. he's missed a few video drops on his normal schedule.

frauditor is fucked. postal worker who attacked him is also fucked. you can't do that especially when he wasnt initially involved. if you want to see the video it's on fapas channel it dropped today.

another dumb ass looking to get a piece of the 1A glory who's just going to end up in jail with more added to his record

so he was on hills id digestive prescription, hills biome, and royal canine gastro. these three were fed to him in rotation for awhile and it was supposed to be more temporary but somehow he ended up on it for more than three years because he just didn't seem to like much else.

he doesn't have any digestive issues that I can tell at this point, everything looks good but I have tried a ton of 'good quality food' to soft replace what he eats

nothing I try works and he's pretty much losing interest in his wet food only loving his hills id dry food.

he tends to like stew more than pate. I've tried so many brands including tiki, fussy cat, nutro, even the really expensive brands.

petsmart had a new brand they were carrying that measures the alkaline levels in the fish flavors they serve and I thought it was a really good brand based on the reviews but you guessed is turned his head.

i could just keep him on dry but he really enjoys wet food when he likes it and I cant figure out what's gonna work but I'm assuming anything like the digestive id stew texture is what he wants but probably in search of a new taste.

he might eat fancy feast flakes or something but I'm trying to avoid low quality stuff unless I'm missing something

he means tabloid journalist because his frauditing is merely for entertainment

and if you accept that then it shifts the context of frauditing itself because by definition he kind of is a journalist

A journalist is a person who collects, verifies, analyzes, and reports factual news and information to the public through various media. Rather than being defined strictly by an employer or a press pass, a true journalist is defined by the process of rigorous fact-checking, independent investigation, and a commitment to truth and public accountability

he's just missing some important key words like respectable, honorable, accredited, experienced, educated, integrity, etc.

no one can prove he kicked down the no trespassing sign. I personally don't believe he did.

then there's the question does it even matter. fahey didn't buy that sign. it wasn't his despite the shared access road.

so can one homeowner of a shared access road make an intentional decision for another homeowner where it intentionally applies to both residences?

but sean had to know fahey would never invite him to his house for any reason and that judge is absolutely convinced he did

then there's the private road sign

a private road sign might not tell every reasonable mind no trespassing but combined with the friction in their relationship it's an enhancing element

and for those reasons he will be found guilty. and he will appeal. both are guaranteed to happen.

custody may be today or he may be allowed to surrender himself at a later date but either way he's screwed.

bonus

trashing the state attorney, assistant state attorney, and fahey himself, exposing fahey's alleged affair, making jokes about his daughter, all while live streaming right after the trial probably wasn't too bright either

figured maybe someone heard something from another channel or live from that area

I had to repost this

lia is probably going to jail tomorrow for contempt that includes intimidation if the state makes the court aware.

so he goes live and trashes the state attorney and assistant state attorney with personal level insults.

then he busts out a a note he allegedly received that details a fahey affair and reads the entire thing while live

there's no way this can help your case.

since you chose a bench trial you're screwed. all four people including the judge work for government. they are human. emotional restraint can only go so far.

case opinion: guilty

do I think you actually violated a trespassing law given what I believe to be the facts? no

do I think youre writing your own conviction and/or incarceration acting like an idiot? yes

I'll be shit shocked if you aren't held in contempt and you actually win this case.

and the only way I see that happening is if the judge commits to not watching your content

uber
-> untrue complaints
-> permanent deactivation
-> hireright reporting
-> other platform instant deactivations

when just a tiny handful of complaints compared to the number of trips you completed match the same category of safety related concerns, you are finished

truth doesn't matter because you did it, they said so, you're guilty but the damage doesn't stop there

once deactivated Uber reports this perfectly constructed vague statement to your HireRight report:

'this person is no longer eligible to use our platform because of safety-related reports'

within days this reporting will be discovered by other platforms and you will instantly be deactivated there too

you can not sue for FCRA violations because while the statement given to HireRight is intentionally vague and damaging, it is not actually false

while the safety reports themselves are false, the statement given to HireRight is actually true

you can dispute the report but your options are limited

all of this when not one complaint is supported by police action, police contact, police reports, court action, video or audio evidence proving you did anything wrong

you could wake up to deactivation tomorrow for a report received three years ago and be banned from all platforms in days and here's why

both platforms continue to retroactively audit driver accounts for past safety reports that did not meet the threshold for deactivation back then but do now

hypothetical this is probably because of ongoing litigation that is questioning both platforms safety commitments and might even be the result of safety-related case settlements

so this means that Uber can centrally label you as a safety risk, ruin your personal credibility, destroy your business relationships, and face no consequences for publishing their carefully worded defamatory opinion to a third party reporting agency with absolutely no proof you did anything wrong

these platforms will do anything they can to damage you. and no one not even government can stop them.

just remember that you work for a dictatorship. all hail to the mighty dara who can seemingly do whatever the fuck he wants.

guy hasnt posted in 2 months. wonder if warren sapp blocks his calls now that hes not frauditing anymore.

I don't know what people are thinking when they quickly hand over their government identification to social media platforms but government identification was originally designed for government use.

Somehow we have skewed this use for everything and anything including point of sale swipes, social media verification, retail return tracking, access control to private communities by camera, etc.

I never mind showing someone my identification but I do mind having it recorded, stored, shared, sold, analyzed, criticized, and used against me.

For this reason it's incredibly difficult to use Facebook because they prompt for ID for some things and I'm simply not providing it - period.

A driver's license has one purpose and one purpose only - it proves you have the allowance to operate a motor vehicle under the authority of the issuing government. Of course we have allowed private companies to demand this document and others without restraint and so many of us are quick to hand it right over.

You guys can provide digital platforms your identification if you want but unless its specific to a job like driving a car, my drivers licenses stays in my wallet.

last video was posted 5 days ago. he missed his wednesday upload.

aps back at it in casper wyoming. wonder if he fled colorado for obvious reasons

I can't remember who it was but it was several years ago one of the frauditors went to a small town got into with a police chief and had his car vandalized and the entire town was telling him to leave and he was getting involved in local town affairs

it wasnt lia and it wasn't bat.

it was either deletelawz or maybe press nh now. I wish I could remember but i remember watching it and I remember the whole town telling him to get lost

he literally got involved in affairs that he had no business being involved in. I almost want to say it was deletelawz but I don't remember clearly maybe you guys can remember

so long island audit says repeatedly that he trains police departments.. I get he wants the recognition of being accepted by law enforcement as an educator but he's mischaracterizing what he did for law enforcement.

what he really did

he was merely a guest speaker or invitee of a few police agencies where he offered his opposing citizen views on police response, police engagement, and his own activities that he feels were mishandled and infringed upon by law enforcement

what training means

training a police department requires expertise in some kind of function they perform. it also requires content structure and curriculum that is qualified by facts of profession.

what he did is far from actually training a police department. he is not a trainer and he has no qualifications to actually train a police department especially when it comes to constitutional rights and law itself. he is not a lawyer does not hold a law degree and never worked in law enforcement. he's not a constitutional scholar like deleteLOLZ either

training liability

actual training can also bear liability. you train officers the wrong way and you could be liable if they use that training and it gets someone hurt or someone killed

at least then his style upgrade would have been complete