u/simple_explorer1

Yes, how much demand would there be for software developers if hypothetically AI were to completely disappear from tomorrow including the open source china or any model? 100%, 300% or nothing? Would it bring back the equilibrium in the IT job market? would questions like these from impacted Devs disappear

All the vibecoded projects left stranded which all of a sudden the confident builders won't even understand (yet wanted to sell it to their customers) and would need real engineers to make it work. Would need back real designer, developers of all skills, DevOps etc.

Companies who confidently reduced hiring at all levels, cut junior roles, QA, designers and even trimmed few infra guys, because 1 Dev with AI was 3x the developer they would have to go back in the market and beg for developers, designers and bunch of other skills to come back and support them. They will go from why do we need to hire/not respect the skills anymore (because anyone can prompt and get it done regardless of code quality) to not being able to function at all without the full capacity of devs.

Just curious to see what people here have to say so that we know the scale of damage caused by AI in the job market and software development as a career.

Opensourcing a library is already a thankless job but now it is monetised by LLM providers.

So, why would anyone opensource their hard work (assuming it is not vibecoded) only to be scraped and monetised by LLM providers like OpenAI and Anthropic via subscription and API costs?

Did some research and few contenders are below:

1. OnePlus Buds 4

2. Galaxy Buds3 FE

3. Sony WF-C710N

Phone, s26 plus. Open to considering other options which I don't know.

Important, active noise cancellation, great sound and mic quality, must fit well in ears.

Don't have time to edit each video and want a point and shoot experience. Is DJI osmo pocket 4p good as a point and shoot without any editing and no D-Log or I won't get the dynamic range without D-Log?

I heard insta 360 Luna ultra is better for point and shoot compared to 4P?

Also why is Luna ultra expensive compared to 4p when 4p is a more established product comparatively?

Not vibe coding. But at my work, I am able to brainstorm and solve extremely complex problems than I otherwise would have been able to using Claude/codex (I have 15 years of experience as a Developer) but I am still not happy compared to pre AI era just 2 years ago, don't know why. I feel nothing, can't quite put my finger on why though. This is very uncanny feeling.

The thing is, everyone in my team is able to solve very complex problems using Claude so, at this point nothing feels like an achievement and truly unique.

This is in stark contrast to just 2 years ago when I was infact working on less complex problems than today but the sense of happiness and achievement was a lot because my work outcome was tied completely to my skills/seniority which was unique in my team and that was true for other team members as well.

Guess I am having a loss of professional identity for almost 1 year now that the software development is not esoteric anymore and anyone can get anything done. Don't know what to do about it and if the excitement will ever come back or is this the end of the road.

Any difference? Which one do you use?

My post was removed by Reddit filters for no reason but there are similar posts on same topic on the same sub which area allowed. So why is my below post removed?

So inconvenient while on the go or driving etc. long time ago it wasn't the case and I don't know why Google thinks this is a good behaviour to reset an active map zoomed point back to default

I want to mostly shoot as point and shoot and not stress about editing and post edits that much. But that can change in future once I have enough time and will.

so,

1. If point and shoot experience is the the primary reason, how goos is insta360 luna ultra vs DJI Osmo Pocket 4p in general? which one would you recommend

2. If I am open to editing then which one?

I want to mostly shoot as point and shoot and not stress about editing and post edits that much. But that can change in future once I have enough time and will.

so,

1. If point and shoot experience is the the primary reason, how goos is insta360 luna ultra vs DJI Osmo Pocket 4p in general? which one would you recommend

2. If I am open to editing then which one?

As the title? How does it drain the battery and does higher 144hz or smart refresh rate drain the battery faster or make the phone hot?

I have only used standard 60 hz refresh rate so far

Config: 16 inch M5 pro, 48GB

I run Qwen 35b MoE, Gemma4 31b dense LLM model and run it locally and yes after constantly using it for a few minutes makes the laptop hot but the fans are still not audible.

If i keep going for a while then i hear fan noise very slightly and the laptop is quite hot on the top chassis and bottom but the moment i stop using LLM even for say a minute or so, it cools RAPIDLY like crazy and goes back to "cool to the touch" extremely quickly.

The thermals and cooling are insane.

Note: This is my first ever M series mac and I have never used any M series mac ever, just heard all the good things about it for the last 7 years. I had 2019 16 inch intel i7 back and have forever used intel macs. I have never used any M series mac to know if this cooling capabilities was the same in m4 pro 16 inch as well or not. I assume yes but not sure if apple made changes to vapour cooling with M5 pro 16 inch this year.

Sprint after sprint we plan how long a list of tasks would take each dev to do and lock the sprint based on the effort and complexity of the work and, very regularly 2 weeks worth of work is getting done in around 1 week for 4 devs in my team. And every single time our manager, who is old school with 25+ years of experience, is surprised and asks how was that possible and the devs just say hard work and dedication and all the usual BS and no one is willing to admit that they are using Claude code to write 90% of their code.

My manager is a bit detached from "AI for code" and only hears about it from us or some of the team events. My company has a physical service as a main product and SaaS is just an enabler. It is not a "software" only company whose survival is purely software. So, AI is not that at the forefront of the company.

This time, we had a massive milestone of 8 weeks worth of work between 4 devs combined, and when the whole work was done in 3 weeks. During the daily scrum updates my manager was getting shocked everyday seeing how fast the implementation was progressing compared to the agreed timeline. At the end of 1st week he even called one of the dev MVP because he finished his 2 weeks tickets in 5 days. At the end of 3 weeks all 4 devs were done and when manager asked how was that possible, the same story, devs are just pretending that it is all hardwork and expertise which is allowing them to zip through the tasks but no one has admitted in front of manager that they used Claude Code to wrap up majority of work. Code review was often the bottleneck.

Has this happened in your team or devs in your team are more willing to admit to the managers that they are using LLMs to write most of the code and are more forthcoming about it?

Note: The company just provides a basic copilot subscription which runs out in few prompts. The devs are using their own personal AI to get the job done

Curious to know. And why if so? I have 16+ years of experience as a dev.

It's been 1 week that I stopped completely and so far it is okay and luckily I can still code ;) (though got rusty initially) and that's what I enjoy doing, thinking about problems, architecting, writing tests, writing code, reviewing PR's etc. keeps my brain sharp and more confident.